Validation and comparison of several global geopotential models with an official quasigeoid solution of Serbia

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 Q4 GEOGRAPHY
Marko D. Stanković, O. Odalović, Miloš Marković
{"title":"Validation and comparison of several global geopotential models with an official quasigeoid solution of Serbia","authors":"Marko D. Stanković, O. Odalović, Miloš Marković","doi":"10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2022.03.432-448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze the quality of several local reference quasigeoid surfaces obtained from several Global Geopotential Models (GGM) relative to the official quasigeoid solution of Serbia (SQM2011) and GNSS/dh observations for the territory of Serbia. Therefore, validation and comparison of the derived surfaces from the three GGM’s were made based on comparisons of height anomaly derived from GGM’s, SQM2011, and the GNSS/dh observations at the points of the high-precision leveling network. The selected publicly available GGM’s in this study are GOCO05c, SGG- UGM-2, and XGM2019e. Primarily, at 1001 points of the high-precision leveling network, the differences between GGM and GNSS/dh height anomaly were calculated. The final translation parameters were calculated in the iteration procedure, which was then used to calculate the final values of the estimated height anomaly for all GGM’s at 143207 points of the regular grid of spatial resolution 0.5' × 0.5' on the entire territory of Serbia. From the estimated height anomaly, three GGM-derived surfaces were modeled relative to the SQM2011. According to the results of the calculations, SGG-UGM-2 provides the best approximation of the quasi- geoid SQM2011, where the remaining differences have a mean value of 0.01 m, a standard deviation of 0.06 m, and a span of 0.67 m.","PeriodicalId":44295,"journal":{"name":"Geodetski Vestnik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geodetski Vestnik","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2022.03.432-448","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the quality of several local reference quasigeoid surfaces obtained from several Global Geopotential Models (GGM) relative to the official quasigeoid solution of Serbia (SQM2011) and GNSS/dh observations for the territory of Serbia. Therefore, validation and comparison of the derived surfaces from the three GGM’s were made based on comparisons of height anomaly derived from GGM’s, SQM2011, and the GNSS/dh observations at the points of the high-precision leveling network. The selected publicly available GGM’s in this study are GOCO05c, SGG- UGM-2, and XGM2019e. Primarily, at 1001 points of the high-precision leveling network, the differences between GGM and GNSS/dh height anomaly were calculated. The final translation parameters were calculated in the iteration procedure, which was then used to calculate the final values of the estimated height anomaly for all GGM’s at 143207 points of the regular grid of spatial resolution 0.5' × 0.5' on the entire territory of Serbia. From the estimated height anomaly, three GGM-derived surfaces were modeled relative to the SQM2011. According to the results of the calculations, SGG-UGM-2 provides the best approximation of the quasi- geoid SQM2011, where the remaining differences have a mean value of 0.01 m, a standard deviation of 0.06 m, and a span of 0.67 m.
几种全球位势模式与塞尔维亚正式拟曲面解的验证和比较
本研究的目的是对比塞尔维亚官方拟面解(SQM2011)和塞尔维亚境内GNSS/dh观测数据,分析几种全球地势模型(GGM)获得的几个局部参考拟面曲面的质量。因此,通过比较GGM的高程异常、SQM2011和高精度水准网各点的GNSS/dh观测数据,对3个GGM的反演曲面进行验证和比较。本研究选取的公开可用GGM为GOCO05c、SGG- UGM-2和XGM2019e。首先,在高精度水准网的1001个点上,计算GGM与GNSS/dh高度异常的差值。在迭代过程中计算最终的平移参数,然后将其用于计算塞尔维亚全境空间分辨率为0.5' × 0.5'的规则网格上143207个点的所有GGM的高度异常估计的最终值。根据估算的高度异常,相对于SQM2011模拟了3个ggm导出的地表。计算结果表明,SGG-UGM-2与准大地水准面SQM2011最接近,差值均值为0.01 m,标准差为0.06 m,差值跨度为0.67 m。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geodetski Vestnik
Geodetski Vestnik GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
33.30%
发文量
10
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Zveza geodetov Slovenije v skladu s svojim poslanstvom in s svojim statutom, izdaja znanstveno, strokovno in informativno glasilo Geodetski vestnik. Izhaja v nakladi 1200 izvodov. Objavlja znanstvene, strokovne in poljudno strokovne prispevke ter informacije. Revija je dostopna v večjem številu sekundarnih podatkovnih baz po svetu in mnogih knjižnicah. Od leta 2008 je vključena v Thomson Scientific bazo podatkov SCI. Cena izvoda revije je za nečlane 17 Evrov.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信