GIS-BASED LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY ASSESSMENT AND FACTOR EFFECT ANALYSIS BY CERTAINTY FACTOR IN UPSTREAM OF JENEBERANG RIVER, INDONESIA

Q4 Social Sciences
P. F. Nurdin, T. Kubota
{"title":"GIS-BASED LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY ASSESSMENT AND FACTOR EFFECT ANALYSIS BY CERTAINTY FACTOR IN UPSTREAM OF JENEBERANG RIVER, INDONESIA","authors":"P. F. Nurdin, T. Kubota","doi":"10.14710/GEOPLANNING.5.1.75-90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to assess landslide susceptibility by employing certainty factors model (CF) to select the causative factors for landslide susceptibility mapping in Upstream of Jeneberang River, South Sulawesi. Indonesia. The landslide causative factors were: soil, slope angle, aspect, elevation, lithology, land use, distance to the river, drainage density, and precipitation. For validation purpose, landslide inventory map was randomly partition into two groups, 30% for the validation and 70% for the training. Landslide susceptibility maps were produced by logistic regression using original factor (all nine factors) and selected factor (four factors with positive CF value). The result of certainty factor analysis shows CF value is positive for elevation, land use, slope and drainage density. The accuracy of two landslide susceptibility maps were evaluated by calculating the area under the curve of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves. The result shows the the success rate curve for nine factor map (80.2%)  is higher than four factor map (78%). But in case of closeness between success rate curve and predictive rate curve, certainty factors model has a closer distance. In this study, effect analysis studies show how the accuracy changes when the input factors are changed.","PeriodicalId":30789,"journal":{"name":"Geoplanning Journal of Geomatics and Planning","volume":"5 1","pages":"75-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.14710/GEOPLANNING.5.1.75-90","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoplanning Journal of Geomatics and Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/GEOPLANNING.5.1.75-90","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This study aimed to assess landslide susceptibility by employing certainty factors model (CF) to select the causative factors for landslide susceptibility mapping in Upstream of Jeneberang River, South Sulawesi. Indonesia. The landslide causative factors were: soil, slope angle, aspect, elevation, lithology, land use, distance to the river, drainage density, and precipitation. For validation purpose, landslide inventory map was randomly partition into two groups, 30% for the validation and 70% for the training. Landslide susceptibility maps were produced by logistic regression using original factor (all nine factors) and selected factor (four factors with positive CF value). The result of certainty factor analysis shows CF value is positive for elevation, land use, slope and drainage density. The accuracy of two landslide susceptibility maps were evaluated by calculating the area under the curve of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves. The result shows the the success rate curve for nine factor map (80.2%)  is higher than four factor map (78%). But in case of closeness between success rate curve and predictive rate curve, certainty factors model has a closer distance. In this study, effect analysis studies show how the accuracy changes when the input factors are changed.
基于gis的印尼jeneberang河上游滑坡易感性评价及确定性因子效应分析
本研究旨在利用确定性因子模型(CF)对南苏拉威西Jeneberang河上游滑坡易感性作图的成因进行评估。印度尼西亚。导致滑坡的因素有:土壤、坡角、坡向、高程、岩性、土地利用、与河流的距离、排水密度和降水。为了验证,将滑坡库存图随机分为两组,30%用于验证,70%用于训练。采用原始因子(全部9个因子)和选择因子(CF值为正的4个因子)进行logistic回归,生成滑坡易感性图。确定性因子分析结果表明,CF值与海拔、土地利用、坡度和排水密度呈正相关。通过计算受试者工作特征曲线下面积,对两幅滑坡敏感性图的精度进行了评价。结果表明,九因子图(80.2%)的成功率曲线高于四因子图(78%)。但在成功率曲线与预测率曲线接近的情况下,确定性因子模型的距离更近。在本研究中,效应分析研究显示了当输入因素发生变化时,准确率是如何变化的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoplanning Journal of Geomatics and Planning
Geoplanning Journal of Geomatics and Planning Earth and Planetary Sciences-Computers in Earth Sciences
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信