Motivation to Read? Reading among the Upper-Class Children in Finland during the 17th and 18th Centuries

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Tuija Laine
{"title":"Motivation to Read? Reading among the Upper-Class Children in Finland during the 17th and 18th Centuries","authors":"Tuija Laine","doi":"10.15388/knygotyra.2021.76.75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the early modern Finland, the Catechisms were the only literature intended for children. Otherwise, the children from all classes had to read adults’ literature. Finland was a part of Sweden until 1809 and the reading of Swedish literature was possible especially among the upper classes and even the common people in the Swedish-speaking western coast. Three case studies of Finnish upper-class children from the 17th and the 18th centuries tell us about children’s reading habits, attitudes to reading and reading motivation in this situation. Richard M. Ryan’s & Edward L. Deci’s theory of self-determination has been used as a theoretical basis for this study. It highlights the combination of three basic psychological needs as means to motivation: autonomy, competence and relatedness. Autonomy was the most limited during the 17th century and emerged step by step towards the end of the 18th century. Relatedness would depend on circumstances in the family. If the family led an active social life, it would also reflect in the reading habits of the household members. All the children in this research belonged to the upper class, so they could read, and they studied diligently. Therefore, they felt competence. The relatives exhorted them in studying, which still increased their self-confidence. Motivation was mostly external at the beginning, but in some cases it gradually grew towards internal motivation. According to these cases, upper-class girls were freer to read what they liked than boys. Comparing to boys they were less educated, but at the same time they experienced less pressure to make progress in literary reading. If the domestic duties permitted, they would be able to use their free time for reading fiction. Boys had to concentrate on thinking about their future careers and subjects relevant to that.","PeriodicalId":37220,"journal":{"name":"Knygotyra","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knygotyra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/knygotyra.2021.76.75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the early modern Finland, the Catechisms were the only literature intended for children. Otherwise, the children from all classes had to read adults’ literature. Finland was a part of Sweden until 1809 and the reading of Swedish literature was possible especially among the upper classes and even the common people in the Swedish-speaking western coast. Three case studies of Finnish upper-class children from the 17th and the 18th centuries tell us about children’s reading habits, attitudes to reading and reading motivation in this situation. Richard M. Ryan’s & Edward L. Deci’s theory of self-determination has been used as a theoretical basis for this study. It highlights the combination of three basic psychological needs as means to motivation: autonomy, competence and relatedness. Autonomy was the most limited during the 17th century and emerged step by step towards the end of the 18th century. Relatedness would depend on circumstances in the family. If the family led an active social life, it would also reflect in the reading habits of the household members. All the children in this research belonged to the upper class, so they could read, and they studied diligently. Therefore, they felt competence. The relatives exhorted them in studying, which still increased their self-confidence. Motivation was mostly external at the beginning, but in some cases it gradually grew towards internal motivation. According to these cases, upper-class girls were freer to read what they liked than boys. Comparing to boys they were less educated, but at the same time they experienced less pressure to make progress in literary reading. If the domestic duties permitted, they would be able to use their free time for reading fiction. Boys had to concentrate on thinking about their future careers and subjects relevant to that.
阅读的动力?17、18世纪芬兰上流社会儿童的阅读
在近代早期的芬兰,《要理问答》是唯一面向儿童的文学作品。否则,所有班级的孩子都必须读成人文学。1809年以前,芬兰一直是瑞典的一部分,因此可以阅读瑞典文学作品,尤其是上层阶级,甚至是讲瑞典语的西海岸的普通人。通过对17世纪和18世纪芬兰上流社会儿童的三个案例研究,我们了解了儿童在这种情况下的阅读习惯、阅读态度和阅读动机。Richard M. Ryan和Edward L. Deci的自我决定理论被用作本研究的理论基础。它强调了作为动机手段的三种基本心理需求的结合:自主性、能力和相关性。自治权在17世纪是最有限的,直到18世纪末才逐步出现。亲缘关系取决于家庭环境。如果一个家庭有活跃的社交生活,这也会反映在家庭成员的阅读习惯上。在这项研究中,所有的孩子都属于上层阶级,所以他们可以阅读,他们学习勤奋。因此,他们觉得自己很有能力。亲戚们鼓励他们学习,这也增加了他们的自信心。最初的动机大多是外在的,但在某些情况下,它逐渐向内在的动机发展。根据这些案例,上层社会的女孩比男孩更自由地阅读她们喜欢的东西。与男孩相比,她们受教育程度较低,但与此同时,她们在文学阅读方面取得进步的压力较小。如果家务允许,他们可以利用空闲时间读小说。男孩们必须集中精力思考他们未来的职业和相关的科目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Knygotyra
Knygotyra Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信