Abnormal tank emissions in the Permian Basin identified using ethane to methane ratios

IF 4.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
D. Caulton, Priya D. Gurav, A. Robertson, Kristen Pozsonyi, S. Murphy, D. Lyon
{"title":"Abnormal tank emissions in the Permian Basin identified using ethane to methane ratios","authors":"D. Caulton, Priya D. Gurav, A. Robertson, Kristen Pozsonyi, S. Murphy, D. Lyon","doi":"10.1525/elementa.2022.00121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has been increasing interest in quantifying methane (CH4) emissions from a view toward mitigation. Accordingly, ground-based sampling of oil and gas production sites in the Permian Basin was carried out in January and October 2020. Molar ethane to methane ratios (EMRs) were quantified, which may be used to distinguish emissions from particular sources, such as produced gas and oil tank flashing. The geometric mean EMR for 100 observations was 18 (±2)%, while source specific EMRs showed that sites where emissions were attributed to a tank produced much higher EMRs averaging 47%. Sites with other noticeable sources such as compressors, pneumatics, and separators had lower and less variable EMRs. Tanks displayed distinct behavior with EMRs between 10% and 21% producing CH4 emissions >30× higher than tanks with EMRs >21%. This observation supports the hypothesis that high emission rate tank sources are often caused by separator malfunctions that leak produced gas through liquids storage tanks.","PeriodicalId":54279,"journal":{"name":"Elementa-Science of the Anthropocene","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Elementa-Science of the Anthropocene","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2022.00121","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There has been increasing interest in quantifying methane (CH4) emissions from a view toward mitigation. Accordingly, ground-based sampling of oil and gas production sites in the Permian Basin was carried out in January and October 2020. Molar ethane to methane ratios (EMRs) were quantified, which may be used to distinguish emissions from particular sources, such as produced gas and oil tank flashing. The geometric mean EMR for 100 observations was 18 (±2)%, while source specific EMRs showed that sites where emissions were attributed to a tank produced much higher EMRs averaging 47%. Sites with other noticeable sources such as compressors, pneumatics, and separators had lower and less variable EMRs. Tanks displayed distinct behavior with EMRs between 10% and 21% producing CH4 emissions >30× higher than tanks with EMRs >21%. This observation supports the hypothesis that high emission rate tank sources are often caused by separator malfunctions that leak produced gas through liquids storage tanks.
利用乙烷与甲烷的比值识别二叠纪盆地的异常油罐排放
从减缓的角度来看,人们对量化甲烷(CH4)排放越来越感兴趣。因此,在2020年1月和10月对二叠纪盆地的油气生产地点进行了地面采样。摩尔乙烷与甲烷的比率(emr)被量化,这可以用来区分来自特定来源的排放,例如产生的气体和油箱闪光。100个观测值的几何平均EMR为18(±2)%,而特定源EMR表明,排放归因于储罐的地点产生的EMR要高得多,平均为47%。有其他明显污染源(如压缩机、气动和分离器)的场所,emr的变化较小。emr值在10% - 21%之间的储罐产生的CH4排放量比emr值为21%的储罐高30倍。这一观察结果支持了这样一种假设,即高排放率罐源通常是由分离器故障引起的,该故障使产生的气体通过液体储罐泄漏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Elementa-Science of the Anthropocene
Elementa-Science of the Anthropocene Earth and Planetary Sciences-Atmospheric Science
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.10%
发文量
65
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: A new open-access scientific journal, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene publishes original research reporting on new knowledge of the Earth’s physical, chemical, and biological systems; interactions between human and natural systems; and steps that can be taken to mitigate and adapt to global change. Elementa reports on fundamental advancements in research organized initially into six knowledge domains, embracing the concept that basic knowledge can foster sustainable solutions for society. Elementa is published on an open-access, public-good basis—available freely and immediately to the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信