The inclusiveness of China’s development finance: China’s hybrid approach to aid and poverty reduction in Africa

IF 4.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Zhao-yang Wang, Kai Feng
{"title":"The inclusiveness of China’s development finance: China’s hybrid approach to aid and poverty reduction in Africa","authors":"Zhao-yang Wang, Kai Feng","doi":"10.1525/elementa.2022.00066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent years have seen China emerging as a new donor outside of the West’s club of traditional donors, seeking to fill the financing gap for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The Chinese government has adopted a hybrid approach to international aid, in which it supplies trade credit and other types of loans to underdeveloped countries through its policy banks and state-owned enterprises in addition to traditional aid. As such a hybrid approach is considered more market-oriented than traditional donors, much of the literature on it has focused on its impact on economic growth rather than on social welfare and poverty reduction. It is critical to note, however, that in reality, the Chinese government has long-valued poverty reduction as a priority of the SDGs, regardless of the context of domestic governance or international aid. Therefore, this article used the panel data of African countries between 2000 and 2016 to test the relationship between China’s development finance and its corresponding poverty-reduction effect in Africa. Empirical results shown that China’s hybrid approach reduced poverty in Africa, particularly in poorer sub-Saharan countries and “heavily indebted poor countries.” Further, in a similar vein to China’s domestic inclusive-growth model, its poverty reduction in Africa tended to be achieved indirectly through production sectors rather than directly through the provision of social relief.","PeriodicalId":54279,"journal":{"name":"Elementa-Science of the Anthropocene","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Elementa-Science of the Anthropocene","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2022.00066","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent years have seen China emerging as a new donor outside of the West’s club of traditional donors, seeking to fill the financing gap for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The Chinese government has adopted a hybrid approach to international aid, in which it supplies trade credit and other types of loans to underdeveloped countries through its policy banks and state-owned enterprises in addition to traditional aid. As such a hybrid approach is considered more market-oriented than traditional donors, much of the literature on it has focused on its impact on economic growth rather than on social welfare and poverty reduction. It is critical to note, however, that in reality, the Chinese government has long-valued poverty reduction as a priority of the SDGs, regardless of the context of domestic governance or international aid. Therefore, this article used the panel data of African countries between 2000 and 2016 to test the relationship between China’s development finance and its corresponding poverty-reduction effect in Africa. Empirical results shown that China’s hybrid approach reduced poverty in Africa, particularly in poorer sub-Saharan countries and “heavily indebted poor countries.” Further, in a similar vein to China’s domestic inclusive-growth model, its poverty reduction in Africa tended to be achieved indirectly through production sectors rather than directly through the provision of social relief.
中国发展融资的包容性:中国对非洲援助与减贫的混合方式
近年来,中国成为西方传统捐助国俱乐部之外的新捐助国,寻求填补可持续发展目标(SDGs)的资金缺口。中国政府对国际援助采取了一种混合的方式,除了传统的援助外,还通过政策性银行和国有企业向欠发达国家提供贸易信贷和其他类型的贷款。由于这种混合方法被认为比传统的捐助者更以市场为导向,因此关于它的许多文献都集中在其对经济增长的影响,而不是对社会福利和减贫的影响。然而,值得注意的是,在现实中,中国政府长期以来一直将减贫视为可持续发展目标的优先事项,无论在国内治理还是国际援助的背景下。因此,本文采用2000 - 2016年非洲国家的面板数据,检验中国发展融资与相应的非洲减贫效果之间的关系。实证结果表明,中国的混合方法减少了非洲的贫困,特别是在较贫穷的撒哈拉以南国家和“重债穷国”。此外,与中国国内的包容性增长模式类似,中国在非洲的减贫往往是通过生产部门间接实现的,而不是通过提供社会救济直接实现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Elementa-Science of the Anthropocene
Elementa-Science of the Anthropocene Earth and Planetary Sciences-Atmospheric Science
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.10%
发文量
65
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: A new open-access scientific journal, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene publishes original research reporting on new knowledge of the Earth’s physical, chemical, and biological systems; interactions between human and natural systems; and steps that can be taken to mitigate and adapt to global change. Elementa reports on fundamental advancements in research organized initially into six knowledge domains, embracing the concept that basic knowledge can foster sustainable solutions for society. Elementa is published on an open-access, public-good basis—available freely and immediately to the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信