El proceso vocacional del estudiantado universitario en condición de logro y rezago académico: Un análisis desde el enfoque evolutivo de Donald Super

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
R. Bulgarelli-Bolaños, José Antonio Rivera-Rodríguez, M. Fallas-Vargas
{"title":"El proceso vocacional del estudiantado universitario en condición de logro y rezago académico: Un análisis desde el enfoque evolutivo de Donald Super","authors":"R. Bulgarelli-Bolaños, José Antonio Rivera-Rodríguez, M. Fallas-Vargas","doi":"10.15359/REE.21-1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is based on an investigation whose main purpose was to analyze students’ vocational development in statuses of achievement and academic lagging in Bachelor’s Degree in Industrial Chemistry at the Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica, during 2014, by implementing Donald Super’s evolutionary approach. A naturalist paradigm, a design of collective case studies of four people (two students from each academic status), four data gathering tools (in-depth interviews, semi-structured interviews, in-depth discussion meetings, and observation), and the categorical thematic analysis method were applied. It was found that there are differences in the vocational process of the four cases studied when referring to one academic status or the other, where the category of achievement is more leaning trend to a better vocational performance, even though it is not a predictor of this; while the academic lagging presents more difficulties in its different vocational stages. Therefore, it is recommended not to neglect academic, vocational and personal-social support to any of both populations, considering their particularities related to the specific vocational processes and the evaluations they carry out during the career.","PeriodicalId":37416,"journal":{"name":"Revista Electronica Educare","volume":"21 1","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15359/REE.21-1.1","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Electronica Educare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15359/REE.21-1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This article is based on an investigation whose main purpose was to analyze students’ vocational development in statuses of achievement and academic lagging in Bachelor’s Degree in Industrial Chemistry at the Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica, during 2014, by implementing Donald Super’s evolutionary approach. A naturalist paradigm, a design of collective case studies of four people (two students from each academic status), four data gathering tools (in-depth interviews, semi-structured interviews, in-depth discussion meetings, and observation), and the categorical thematic analysis method were applied. It was found that there are differences in the vocational process of the four cases studied when referring to one academic status or the other, where the category of achievement is more leaning trend to a better vocational performance, even though it is not a predictor of this; while the academic lagging presents more difficulties in its different vocational stages. Therefore, it is recommended not to neglect academic, vocational and personal-social support to any of both populations, considering their particularities related to the specific vocational processes and the evaluations they carry out during the career.
大学生在成就与学业落后条件下的职业过程:唐纳德·超级进化方法的分析
本文基于一项调查,其主要目的是通过实施Donald Super的进化方法,分析2014年哥斯达黎加国立大学工业化学学士学位学生的成就状况和学业滞后情况。采用自然主义研究范式、四人集体案例研究设计(每个学术地位两名学生)、深度访谈、半结构化访谈、深度讨论会议和观察四种数据收集工具以及分类主题分析方法。研究发现,在不同学术地位的情况下,四个案例的职业过程存在差异,成就类别更倾向于更好的职业绩效,尽管它不是职业绩效的预测因子;而学业滞后在不同的职业阶段表现出更多的困难。因此,建议不要忽视对这两个群体中的任何一个群体的学术、职业和个人社会支持,考虑到他们的特殊性与具体的职业过程和他们在职业生涯中进行的评价有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Electronica Educare
Revista Electronica Educare Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Educare Electronic Journal is edited and published by the Center for Research and Teaching in Education (Centro de Investigación y Docencia en Educación) from the Universidad Nacional (National University, Costa Rica). It is an international, quarterly, academic publication. Educare’s aim is to disseminate academic production in the area of Education, both nationally and internationally, allowing authors to communicate their findings, and readers, the possibility to discover the extensive work related to the discipline and its impact and relationship with other fields of knowledge. In search of the construction of interdisciplinary pedagogical thought, the Journal seeks academic reflection; the discussion and analysis of the published knowledge; the incorporation of new perspectives; the reference to innovation and the presentation of successful methodological applications. Aware of the wide range of expressions in this discipline, from theoretical conceptualizations to practical exercises, Educare offers a space for exchange, dissemination and promotion of Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信