Risky Mortgages and Macroprudential Policy: A Calibrated DSGE Model for Lithuania

Jaunius Karmelavičius
{"title":"Risky Mortgages and Macroprudential Policy: A Calibrated DSGE Model for Lithuania","authors":"Jaunius Karmelavičius","doi":"10.15388/ekon.2021.100.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following the financial crisis of 2009 there was an emergence of macroprudential policy tools, as well as a need to model the macroeconomy and the financial sector in a coherent framework. This paper develops and calibrates a small open economy DSGE model for Lithuania to shed some light on the interactions between the macroeconomy and the banking sector, regulated by macroprudential policy. The model features housing market, and endogenous credit risk a la de Walque et al. (2010), whereby the household can default on mortgage repayments, what leads to housing collateral seizure. Foreign-owned banks, that are subject to risk-sensitive macroprudential capital requirements, take into account not only the mortgage default rate but also the cap on loan to value (LTV) ratio when making lending decisions. Using this mechanism, we show that while a more stringent LTV constraint reduced credit demand, it can also lead to an expansion in credit supply via lower credit risk. Therefore, a tightening of LTV requirement should result in only a slight reduction in mortgage lending, coupled with lower interest rate margins. The article compares the impact of the tightening of three macroprudential tools, namely, bank capital requirements, mortgage risk weights and LTV limit. We find that broad-based capital requirements, such as the counter-cyclical capital buffer, are less efficient in leaning against the housing credit cycle, because of a relatively large cost incurred on the firm sector.","PeriodicalId":36306,"journal":{"name":"Ekonomika Vilniaus Universitetas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekonomika Vilniaus Universitetas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/ekon.2021.100.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Following the financial crisis of 2009 there was an emergence of macroprudential policy tools, as well as a need to model the macroeconomy and the financial sector in a coherent framework. This paper develops and calibrates a small open economy DSGE model for Lithuania to shed some light on the interactions between the macroeconomy and the banking sector, regulated by macroprudential policy. The model features housing market, and endogenous credit risk a la de Walque et al. (2010), whereby the household can default on mortgage repayments, what leads to housing collateral seizure. Foreign-owned banks, that are subject to risk-sensitive macroprudential capital requirements, take into account not only the mortgage default rate but also the cap on loan to value (LTV) ratio when making lending decisions. Using this mechanism, we show that while a more stringent LTV constraint reduced credit demand, it can also lead to an expansion in credit supply via lower credit risk. Therefore, a tightening of LTV requirement should result in only a slight reduction in mortgage lending, coupled with lower interest rate margins. The article compares the impact of the tightening of three macroprudential tools, namely, bank capital requirements, mortgage risk weights and LTV limit. We find that broad-based capital requirements, such as the counter-cyclical capital buffer, are less efficient in leaning against the housing credit cycle, because of a relatively large cost incurred on the firm sector.
风险抵押贷款和宏观审慎政策:立陶宛的校准DSGE模型
2009年金融危机之后,出现了宏观审慎政策工具,也需要在一个连贯的框架内对宏观经济和金融部门进行建模。本文为立陶宛开发和校准了一个小型开放经济DSGE模型,以揭示宏观经济与银行业之间的相互作用,受宏观审慎政策的监管。该模型的特点是住房市场和内生性信用风险(la de Walque et al., 2010),即家庭可能拖欠抵押贷款还款,从而导致住房抵押品被扣押。外资银行受到风险敏感型宏观审慎资本要求的约束,在做出贷款决策时,不仅要考虑抵押贷款违约率,还要考虑贷款价值比上限。使用这一机制,我们表明,虽然更严格的LTV约束减少了信贷需求,但它也可以通过降低信贷风险导致信贷供应的扩张。因此,收紧LTV要求应该只会导致抵押贷款的小幅减少,同时息差也会降低。本文比较了银行资本金要求、抵押贷款风险权重和LTV限制这三种宏观审慎工具收紧的影响。我们发现,广泛的资本要求,如反周期资本缓冲,在抵御住房信贷周期方面效率较低,因为企业部门产生了相对较大的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ekonomika Vilniaus Universitetas
Ekonomika Vilniaus Universitetas Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信