Chapter 9. Establishing Common Ground: Finding Better Ways to Communicate About Climate Disruption

Collabra Pub Date : 2016-12-12 DOI:10.1525/COLLABRA.68
A. Barnosky, T. Matlock, J. Christensen, Hahrie Han, Jack Miles, R. Rice, Leroy Westerling, L. White
{"title":"Chapter 9. Establishing Common Ground: Finding Better Ways to Communicate About Climate Disruption","authors":"A. Barnosky, T. Matlock, J. Christensen, Hahrie Han, Jack Miles, R. Rice, Leroy Westerling, L. White","doi":"10.1525/COLLABRA.68","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The key message of this chapter is that solving the climate problem will require motivating social and behavioral changes through effective communication. More and better communication about climate issues is needed so people will mobilize solutions. Currently most people in the world do not believe that climate change is worth doing anything about, if they have even heard of it at all. Despite the efforts of many journalists, scientists, educators, and politicians to convey the science behind and urgency of climate disruption, about a third of Americans still deny that climate is changing or that humans cause it, and nearly 60% feel that climate change is not a problem serious enough to affect them. What is more, in many parts of the world, at most 35% of adults have even heard of climate change. This general lack of recognition about the magnitude of climate disruption and the urgency of dealing with it is slowing down the process of implementing solutions. Even if high-level decision makers want to put in place the policies, incentives, and ready-to-be-deployed technologies required to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, they are unable do so to the extent needed because they have to answer to their constituencies. Put another way, only if the majority of the global society sees the need to mitigate climate change, and the feasibility of doing so, will decision-makers be able to enact the policy changes needed to jumpstart a global energy transition. The good news, however, is that most people—for example, around 60% in the United States—have not yet made up their minds about the need to fix the climate problem. Reaching these individuals with the right information in the right way offers great opportunity to boost societal awareness and effect necessary change. In this chapter we briefly review the information that supports these statements, and summarize the key pathways of communication about climate change that have prevailed so far, including where they have been successful and where they have fallen short. We focus on the United States, because of its high-­emitter status and consequent influence on attitudes about climate mitigation worldwide. We then discuss findings from recent research on communication strategies that suggest an effective way forward—namely, that much remains to be done through appropriate framing of the issues for diverse constituencies that have not been effectively reached. We suggest that by targeting specific audiences with appropriately framed information, the societal balance can be tipped from the current condition of a majority who are apathetic to a majority who become receptive to the reality of harmful climate disruption and the need to avoid it. For example, strategies may include peer-to-peer interactions that communicate how climate change and associated impacts fit with existing value systems that define various religious, political, and economic spheres. To this end, we recognize four general communication strategies that will be useful. - Develop coordinated local, state, national, and international informational campaigns to tell diverse constituencies about the need for and benefits of mitigating climate change. These must be framed appropriately for specific target audiences, much as advertising ­agencies do to promote products effectively, and evaluated rigorously to know how to improve ­subsequent campaigns. - Integrate education about climate change impacts and solutions into all levels of ­education, from K-12 through University curricula. - Create venues for decision makers, business leaders, religious leaders, and academics, spanning the natural sciences, social sciences, humanities, and the arts, with the overall goal of developing recognition, dialog, and action on the intertwined ­behavioral, ethical, political, economic, social, health, and scientific dimensions of climate disruption. - Communicate that actionable solutions to climate change problems exist and are feasible to implement. This should include embedding climate change information and action opportunities across a variety of venues, from print journalism, to traditional TV and radio, to digital and social media.","PeriodicalId":93422,"journal":{"name":"Collabra","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collabra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/COLLABRA.68","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The key message of this chapter is that solving the climate problem will require motivating social and behavioral changes through effective communication. More and better communication about climate issues is needed so people will mobilize solutions. Currently most people in the world do not believe that climate change is worth doing anything about, if they have even heard of it at all. Despite the efforts of many journalists, scientists, educators, and politicians to convey the science behind and urgency of climate disruption, about a third of Americans still deny that climate is changing or that humans cause it, and nearly 60% feel that climate change is not a problem serious enough to affect them. What is more, in many parts of the world, at most 35% of adults have even heard of climate change. This general lack of recognition about the magnitude of climate disruption and the urgency of dealing with it is slowing down the process of implementing solutions. Even if high-level decision makers want to put in place the policies, incentives, and ready-to-be-deployed technologies required to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, they are unable do so to the extent needed because they have to answer to their constituencies. Put another way, only if the majority of the global society sees the need to mitigate climate change, and the feasibility of doing so, will decision-makers be able to enact the policy changes needed to jumpstart a global energy transition. The good news, however, is that most people—for example, around 60% in the United States—have not yet made up their minds about the need to fix the climate problem. Reaching these individuals with the right information in the right way offers great opportunity to boost societal awareness and effect necessary change. In this chapter we briefly review the information that supports these statements, and summarize the key pathways of communication about climate change that have prevailed so far, including where they have been successful and where they have fallen short. We focus on the United States, because of its high-­emitter status and consequent influence on attitudes about climate mitigation worldwide. We then discuss findings from recent research on communication strategies that suggest an effective way forward—namely, that much remains to be done through appropriate framing of the issues for diverse constituencies that have not been effectively reached. We suggest that by targeting specific audiences with appropriately framed information, the societal balance can be tipped from the current condition of a majority who are apathetic to a majority who become receptive to the reality of harmful climate disruption and the need to avoid it. For example, strategies may include peer-to-peer interactions that communicate how climate change and associated impacts fit with existing value systems that define various religious, political, and economic spheres. To this end, we recognize four general communication strategies that will be useful. - Develop coordinated local, state, national, and international informational campaigns to tell diverse constituencies about the need for and benefits of mitigating climate change. These must be framed appropriately for specific target audiences, much as advertising ­agencies do to promote products effectively, and evaluated rigorously to know how to improve ­subsequent campaigns. - Integrate education about climate change impacts and solutions into all levels of ­education, from K-12 through University curricula. - Create venues for decision makers, business leaders, religious leaders, and academics, spanning the natural sciences, social sciences, humanities, and the arts, with the overall goal of developing recognition, dialog, and action on the intertwined ­behavioral, ethical, political, economic, social, health, and scientific dimensions of climate disruption. - Communicate that actionable solutions to climate change problems exist and are feasible to implement. This should include embedding climate change information and action opportunities across a variety of venues, from print journalism, to traditional TV and radio, to digital and social media.
第9章。建立共识:寻找更好的方式就气候破坏进行沟通
本章的关键信息是,解决气候问题需要通过有效的沟通来推动社会和行为的改变。需要就气候问题进行更多和更好的沟通,以便人们动员解决方案。目前,世界上大多数人都不相信气候变化值得做任何事情,如果他们听说过的话。尽管许多记者、科学家、教育工作者和政治家努力传达气候破坏背后的科学和紧迫性,但大约三分之一的美国人仍然否认气候正在变化或人类造成了气候变化,近60%的人认为气候变化不是一个严重到足以影响他们的问题。更重要的是,在世界许多地方,最多只有35%的成年人听说过气候变化。人们普遍对气候破坏的严重性和应对气候破坏的紧迫性缺乏认识,这减缓了实施解决方案的进程。即使高层决策者想要落实减少温室气体排放所需的政策、激励措施和随时可部署的技术,他们也无法做到所需的程度,因为他们必须对选民负责。换句话说,只有当全球社会的大多数人都认识到减缓气候变化的必要性和这样做的可行性时,决策者才能够制定出启动全球能源转型所需的政策变化。然而,好消息是,大多数人——比如大约60%的美国人——还没有就解决气候问题的必要性下定决心。以正确的方式向这些人提供正确的信息,为提高社会意识和实现必要的变革提供了巨大的机会。在本章中,我们简要回顾了支持这些说法的信息,并总结了迄今为止流行的关于气候变化的主要沟通途径,包括它们在哪些方面取得了成功,在哪些方面存在不足。我们将重点放在美国,因为它的高排放国地位及其对全球气候减缓态度的影响。然后,我们讨论了最近关于传播策略的研究结果,这些研究提出了一条有效的前进道路,也就是说,通过适当地为尚未有效达到的不同选区制定问题,还有很多工作要做。我们建议,通过向特定受众提供适当框架的信息,社会平衡可以从大多数人漠不关心的现状转变为大多数人能够接受有害气候破坏的现实以及避免它的必要性。例如,战略可能包括点对点互动,以沟通气候变化及其相关影响如何与定义各种宗教、政治和经济领域的现有价值体系相适应。为此目的,我们认识到四种有用的一般传播策略。-开展协调的地方、州、国家和国际信息宣传活动,向不同的选民宣传减缓气候变化的必要性和益处。它们必须针对特定的目标受众进行适当的设计,就像广告公司为有效地推广产品所做的那样,并经过严格的评估,以了解如何改进后续的活动。-将有关气候变化影响和解决方案的教育纳入从K-12到大学的各级教育课程。-为决策者、商界领袖、宗教领袖和学者创造场所,涵盖自然科学、社会科学、人文科学和艺术领域,总体目标是就气候破坏的行为、伦理、政治、经济、社会、健康和科学等方面相互交织的问题开展认识、对话和行动。-沟通气候变化问题的可行解决方案,并且是可行的。这应包括将气候变化信息和行动机会嵌入各种场所,从印刷新闻到传统电视和广播,再到数字和社交媒体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信