13. A Look at American Legal Practice through a Perspective of Jewish Law, Ethics, and Tradition: A Conceptual Overview

Samuel J. Levine
{"title":"13. A Look at American Legal Practice through a Perspective of Jewish Law, Ethics, and Tradition: A Conceptual Overview","authors":"Samuel J. Levine","doi":"10.1515/9781618116567-015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A discussion of American legal practice through a perspective of Jewish law, ethics, and tradition may be considered under at least two distinct but interrelated approaches. A historical approach might look to attitudes toward lawyers found in sources relating to courts that have functioned under the Jewish legal system. Levine explains that, because Jewish courts classically operated under an inquisitorial system of justice, relatively few primary sources of Jewish law include material addressing the role of lawyers. Accordingly, references to lawyers in Jewish law and tradition may remain of little relevance to the practice of law in the contemporary United States, as any normative conclusions derived from these sources likely depend upon underlying assumptions inapplicable to the American adversary legal system. Levine suggests that an alternative approach might instead focus more generally upon areas of Jewish law and ethics that, although perhaps not always directly related to the substance of legal practice, may in fact offer a more accurate indication of the attitudes of Jewish tradition toward the work of American lawyers. Toward that end, he presents a three-tiered conceptual framework suitable for an analysis of the implications for Jewish law and ethics of a broad range of human activities, including various aspects of the practice of law. Finally, branching out from Jewish tradition, Levine concludes with a broader reference to the effectiveness of the religious lawyering movement in providing a means for improving exploration of and attitudes toward the work and ethics of lawyers.","PeriodicalId":82192,"journal":{"name":"Notre Dame journal of law, ethics & public policy","volume":"20 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Notre Dame journal of law, ethics & public policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9781618116567-015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

A discussion of American legal practice through a perspective of Jewish law, ethics, and tradition may be considered under at least two distinct but interrelated approaches. A historical approach might look to attitudes toward lawyers found in sources relating to courts that have functioned under the Jewish legal system. Levine explains that, because Jewish courts classically operated under an inquisitorial system of justice, relatively few primary sources of Jewish law include material addressing the role of lawyers. Accordingly, references to lawyers in Jewish law and tradition may remain of little relevance to the practice of law in the contemporary United States, as any normative conclusions derived from these sources likely depend upon underlying assumptions inapplicable to the American adversary legal system. Levine suggests that an alternative approach might instead focus more generally upon areas of Jewish law and ethics that, although perhaps not always directly related to the substance of legal practice, may in fact offer a more accurate indication of the attitudes of Jewish tradition toward the work of American lawyers. Toward that end, he presents a three-tiered conceptual framework suitable for an analysis of the implications for Jewish law and ethics of a broad range of human activities, including various aspects of the practice of law. Finally, branching out from Jewish tradition, Levine concludes with a broader reference to the effectiveness of the religious lawyering movement in providing a means for improving exploration of and attitudes toward the work and ethics of lawyers.
13. 从犹太法律、伦理和传统的角度看美国法律实践:概念概述
从犹太法律、伦理和传统的角度来讨论美国法律实践,至少可以从两种截然不同但又相互关联的角度来考虑。从历史的角度来看,可以从有关在犹太法律制度下运作的法院的资料中找到对律师的态度。莱文解释说,由于犹太法庭传统上是在司法调查制度下运作的,因此犹太法律的主要来源中涉及律师角色的材料相对较少。因此,犹太法律和传统中对律师的提及可能与当代美国的法律实践关系不大,因为从这些来源得出的任何规范性结论都可能依赖于不适用于美国对手法律制度的基本假设。莱文建议,另一种方法可能会更广泛地关注犹太法律和道德领域,尽管这些领域可能并不总是与法律实践的实质直接相关,但实际上可能更准确地表明犹太传统对美国律师工作的态度。为此,他提出了一个三层概念框架,适用于分析广泛的人类活动(包括法律实践的各个方面)对犹太法律和伦理的影响。最后,在犹太传统的基础上,莱文总结了宗教律师运动的有效性,它提供了一种改善对律师工作和道德的探索和态度的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信