Csanád vármegye idegen megszállásának diplomáciai háttere

Attila Marosvári
{"title":"Csanád vármegye idegen megszállásának diplomáciai háttere","authors":"Attila Marosvári","doi":"10.14232/belv.2022.1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In connection with the study of the military and political collapse of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy at the end of the First World War, several authors have recently discussed in detail the issues raised by the status of the Banat, related Serbian and Romanian aspirations, and the movements of the French forces that occupied and held military control over the region, as well as analysing the French diplomatic steps behind these movements. The future fate of the Banat proved to be a serious source of conflict, with the possibility of armed clashes between the Serbs and the Romanians. The French wanted to prevent armed conflict between their allies with a north-south demarcation line separating the opposing parties and by occupying strategic points, such as Szeged and Arad, until the peace conference decided on the final status of the area. In theory, the line between Szeged and Arad, practically the route of the River Mureş, marked the northern border of the area in question. However, it is not widely known that the Serbs, in competition with the Romanians, claimed not only the area to the south of the Mureş, but also the areas of southern Csanád to the north of the river, right up to Mezőhegyes, and to this end, military action was taken and diplomatic efforts were made at the Paris Peace Conference in March 1919. All this inevitably concealed the possibility of a Serbian-Romanian armed conflict over the possession of this territory, which required the repeated intervention of the French and which was embodied by the French military occupation of Makó, the seat of Csanád county, for almost two months from 27 April to 16 June 1919. This was followed by the Romanian military occupation, which lasted for a good nine months. Our study seeks to review the background and steps of this process, which have not been sufficiently elucidated in the historical literature to date.","PeriodicalId":30998,"journal":{"name":"Belvedere Meridionale","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Belvedere Meridionale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14232/belv.2022.1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In connection with the study of the military and political collapse of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy at the end of the First World War, several authors have recently discussed in detail the issues raised by the status of the Banat, related Serbian and Romanian aspirations, and the movements of the French forces that occupied and held military control over the region, as well as analysing the French diplomatic steps behind these movements. The future fate of the Banat proved to be a serious source of conflict, with the possibility of armed clashes between the Serbs and the Romanians. The French wanted to prevent armed conflict between their allies with a north-south demarcation line separating the opposing parties and by occupying strategic points, such as Szeged and Arad, until the peace conference decided on the final status of the area. In theory, the line between Szeged and Arad, practically the route of the River Mureş, marked the northern border of the area in question. However, it is not widely known that the Serbs, in competition with the Romanians, claimed not only the area to the south of the Mureş, but also the areas of southern Csanád to the north of the river, right up to Mezőhegyes, and to this end, military action was taken and diplomatic efforts were made at the Paris Peace Conference in March 1919. All this inevitably concealed the possibility of a Serbian-Romanian armed conflict over the possession of this territory, which required the repeated intervention of the French and which was embodied by the French military occupation of Makó, the seat of Csanád county, for almost two months from 27 April to 16 June 1919. This was followed by the Romanian military occupation, which lasted for a good nine months. Our study seeks to review the background and steps of this process, which have not been sufficiently elucidated in the historical literature to date.
外国占领Csanád县的外交背景
在研究第一次世界大战结束时奥匈帝国的军事和政治崩溃时,几位作者最近详细讨论了巴纳特的地位、有关的塞尔维亚人和罗马尼亚人的愿望以及占领和军事控制该地区的法国军队的运动所引起的问题,并分析了法国在这些运动背后的外交步骤。巴纳特的未来命运证明是冲突的一个严重根源,塞族人和罗马尼亚人之间有可能发生武装冲突。在和平会议决定该地区的最终地位之前,法国希望通过南北分界线将对立双方分开,并占领战略要地,如塞格德和阿拉德,以防止盟国之间的武装冲突。理论上,塞格德和阿拉德之间的界线,实际上是穆列伊茨河的路线,标志着该地区的北部边界。然而,不广为人知的是,塞尔维亚人为了同罗马尼亚人竞争,不仅对穆雷伊河以南的地区提出要求,而且对Csanád以南至河以北直至Mezőhegyes的地区也提出要求,为此目的,在1919年3月的巴黎和会上采取了军事行动并作出了外交努力。所有这一切都不可避免地掩盖了塞尔维亚-罗马尼亚为占有这一领土而发生武装冲突的可能性,这种冲突需要法国的反复干预,体现在法国从1919年4月27日至6月16日对Csanád县所在地Makó的军事占领将近两个月。随后是罗马尼亚的军事占领,持续了整整9个月。我们的研究旨在回顾这一过程的背景和步骤,迄今为止在历史文献中还没有得到充分的阐明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信