Bringing the transnational into ‘new wars’: the case of islamic state

Q3 Social Sciences
Peter Layton
{"title":"Bringing the transnational into ‘new wars’: the case of islamic state","authors":"Peter Layton","doi":"10.1515/irsr-2015-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In her seminal 1998 work on ‘new wars’ Mary Kaldor developed a heuristic framework usefully for understanding the characteristics of armed non-state groups involved in contemporary conflicts. This framework was derived from analysing the 1992-1995 Bosnia-Herzegovina conflict. Some two decades after this however, adjustments may now be necessary. A focussed examination of the strategy used during 2014 by Islamic State Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) reveals Kaldor’s framework may now need to include a more explicit focus on the transnational. Since the mid-1990s, the transnational has been made more accessible by advances in social media in particular, and by globalization more generally. ISIS’s use of the transnational indicates this may be an area that astute non-state actors can advantageously exploit - perhaps better than states - although there are some difficulties involved. ISIS’s success suggests that the transnational may in time have greater influence on the politics of international society.","PeriodicalId":37251,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Social Research","volume":"5 1","pages":"191 - 201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Social Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/irsr-2015-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Abstract In her seminal 1998 work on ‘new wars’ Mary Kaldor developed a heuristic framework usefully for understanding the characteristics of armed non-state groups involved in contemporary conflicts. This framework was derived from analysing the 1992-1995 Bosnia-Herzegovina conflict. Some two decades after this however, adjustments may now be necessary. A focussed examination of the strategy used during 2014 by Islamic State Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) reveals Kaldor’s framework may now need to include a more explicit focus on the transnational. Since the mid-1990s, the transnational has been made more accessible by advances in social media in particular, and by globalization more generally. ISIS’s use of the transnational indicates this may be an area that astute non-state actors can advantageously exploit - perhaps better than states - although there are some difficulties involved. ISIS’s success suggests that the transnational may in time have greater influence on the politics of international society.
将跨国势力引入“新战争”:伊斯兰国的例子
在她1998年关于“新战争”的开创性著作中,玛丽·卡尔多提出了一个启发式框架,有助于理解卷入当代冲突的非国家武装团体的特征。这一框架是通过分析1992-1995年波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那冲突得出的。然而,大约20年后的今天,调整可能是必要的。对2014年伊拉克和沙姆伊斯兰国(ISIS)使用的战略进行集中考察后发现,卡尔多的框架现在可能需要更明确地关注跨国组织。自20世纪90年代中期以来,由于社交媒体的进步,以及更普遍的全球化,跨国公司变得更容易接近。ISIS对跨国组织的使用表明,这可能是一个精明的非国家行为体可以有利地利用的领域——也许比国家行为体更好——尽管其中存在一些困难。ISIS的成功表明,跨国组织迟早会对国际社会的政治产生更大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Review of Social Research
International Review of Social Research Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信