Resistance exercise interventions during and following cancer treatment: a systematic review.

B. Focht, S. Clinton, S. Devor, M. Garver, Alexander R. Lucas, J. Thomas-Ahner, E. Grainger
{"title":"Resistance exercise interventions during and following cancer treatment: a systematic review.","authors":"B. Focht, S. Clinton, S. Devor, M. Garver, Alexander R. Lucas, J. Thomas-Ahner, E. Grainger","doi":"10.12788/J.SUPONC.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Findings from prior systematic reviews suggest that exercise results in meaningful improvements in many clinically relevant physiologic and quality of life (QOL) outcomes during and following cancer treatment. However, the majority of exercise-cancer studies have focused upon the benefits of aerobic exercise (AE) and knowledge of the efficacy of resistance exercise (RE) alone as a supportive care intervention for cancer patients and survivors remains limited. Consequently, the purpose of this review was to provide the first systematic evaluation of the effects of RE alone upon clinically relevant physiologic and QOL outcomes during and following cancer treatment. Literature searches were conducted to identify studies examining RE interventions in cancer patients and survivors. Data were extracted on physiologic (fitness, physical function, and body composition) and QOL (fatigue, psychological well-being, and cancer-specific and global QOL outcomes. Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated for each outcome. A total of 15 studies (6 in samples undergoing active cancer treatment and 9 in samples having completed cancer treatment) involving 1,077 participants met the inclusion criteria. Findings revealed that, on average, RE resulted in large effect-size improvements in muscular strength (d = 0.86), moderate effect-size improvements in physical function (d = 0.66), and small effect-size improvements in body composition (d = 0.28) and QOL (d = 0.25) outcomes. The effect sizes observed following RE are comparable in magnitude to the effects of exercise interventions reported in prior comprehensive reviews of the exercise-cancer literature which primarily focused upon AE. Additionally, the methodologic quality of the studies was generally strong. Taken collectively, results of this systematic review suggest that RE is a promising supportive care intervention that results in meaningful improvements in clinically relevant physiologic and QOL outcomes during and following cancer treatment.","PeriodicalId":75116,"journal":{"name":"The journal of supportive oncology","volume":"11 2 1","pages":"45-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of supportive oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/J.SUPONC.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

Findings from prior systematic reviews suggest that exercise results in meaningful improvements in many clinically relevant physiologic and quality of life (QOL) outcomes during and following cancer treatment. However, the majority of exercise-cancer studies have focused upon the benefits of aerobic exercise (AE) and knowledge of the efficacy of resistance exercise (RE) alone as a supportive care intervention for cancer patients and survivors remains limited. Consequently, the purpose of this review was to provide the first systematic evaluation of the effects of RE alone upon clinically relevant physiologic and QOL outcomes during and following cancer treatment. Literature searches were conducted to identify studies examining RE interventions in cancer patients and survivors. Data were extracted on physiologic (fitness, physical function, and body composition) and QOL (fatigue, psychological well-being, and cancer-specific and global QOL outcomes. Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated for each outcome. A total of 15 studies (6 in samples undergoing active cancer treatment and 9 in samples having completed cancer treatment) involving 1,077 participants met the inclusion criteria. Findings revealed that, on average, RE resulted in large effect-size improvements in muscular strength (d = 0.86), moderate effect-size improvements in physical function (d = 0.66), and small effect-size improvements in body composition (d = 0.28) and QOL (d = 0.25) outcomes. The effect sizes observed following RE are comparable in magnitude to the effects of exercise interventions reported in prior comprehensive reviews of the exercise-cancer literature which primarily focused upon AE. Additionally, the methodologic quality of the studies was generally strong. Taken collectively, results of this systematic review suggest that RE is a promising supportive care intervention that results in meaningful improvements in clinically relevant physiologic and QOL outcomes during and following cancer treatment.
抗阻运动干预期间和之后的癌症治疗:系统回顾。
先前系统综述的研究结果表明,在癌症治疗期间和之后,运动可以显著改善许多临床相关的生理和生活质量(QOL)结果。然而,大多数运动-癌症的研究都集中在有氧运动(AE)的益处上,而对阻力运动(RE)作为癌症患者和幸存者的支持性护理干预的有效性的认识仍然有限。因此,本综述的目的是首次系统评估在癌症治疗期间和之后单独使用RE对临床相关生理和生活质量结果的影响。文献检索是为了确定对癌症患者和幸存者进行RE干预的研究。提取生理(健康、身体功能和身体组成)和生活质量(疲劳、心理健康)以及癌症特异性和整体生活质量结果的数据。计算每个结果的科恩效应量。共有15项研究(6项在接受积极癌症治疗的样本中,9项在完成癌症治疗的样本中)涉及1,077名参与者符合纳入标准。研究结果显示,平均而言,RE导致肌肉力量(d = 0.86)的大效应量改善,身体功能(d = 0.66)的中等效应量改善,身体组成(d = 0.28)和生活质量(d = 0.25)结果的小效应量改善。RE后观察到的效应大小与先前主要关注AE的运动-癌症文献的综合综述中报道的运动干预的效果相当。此外,这些研究的方法学质量普遍较高。总的来说,本系统综述的结果表明,RE是一种有希望的支持性护理干预,在癌症治疗期间和之后的临床相关生理和生活质量结果有意义的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信