Perspectives, Insights & Priorities: 17 Leaders Speak Freely of Librarianship (review)

J. Johnston
{"title":"Perspectives, Insights & Priorities: 17 Leaders Speak Freely of Librarianship (review)","authors":"J. Johnston","doi":"10.1353/lac.2006.0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"how people outside of organizations do most of the security checking for internally produced programs is pretty scary. The essays in Information Ethics in the Electronic Age originated as presentations at the “Ethics of Electronic Information in the 21st Century” symposium in 2002. They deal with the very serious ways in which, as editor Tom Mendina describes it, “information and information technology often seem to exceed, even contradict or oppose, the purposes of their creators” (2). In the pieces in section 1, “Africa,” these confl icts are invariably politically fraught: the commercial use of Indigenous knowledge in developing countries; the right of access to information for all; linking developing countries with the outside world; and the lack of infrastructure to support Internet development. Sections 2 and 3, “Information Organizations and the Handling of Information” and “Information Issues in the Post-Nine-Eleven World,” return to the more familiar territory of cybercrime, copyright, privacy, and educating information professionals about ethics and the electronic environment. Two thought-provoking contributions (curiously placed in different sections) are Douglas Raber’s “Is Universal Service a Universal Right?” and Alistair S. Duff’s “For a New Nanny State.” Both bring earlier discussions of civil liberties and responsibilities to bear on present-day issues.","PeriodicalId":81853,"journal":{"name":"Libraries & culture","volume":"41 1","pages":"414 - 415"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/lac.2006.0045","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Libraries & culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/lac.2006.0045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

how people outside of organizations do most of the security checking for internally produced programs is pretty scary. The essays in Information Ethics in the Electronic Age originated as presentations at the “Ethics of Electronic Information in the 21st Century” symposium in 2002. They deal with the very serious ways in which, as editor Tom Mendina describes it, “information and information technology often seem to exceed, even contradict or oppose, the purposes of their creators” (2). In the pieces in section 1, “Africa,” these confl icts are invariably politically fraught: the commercial use of Indigenous knowledge in developing countries; the right of access to information for all; linking developing countries with the outside world; and the lack of infrastructure to support Internet development. Sections 2 and 3, “Information Organizations and the Handling of Information” and “Information Issues in the Post-Nine-Eleven World,” return to the more familiar territory of cybercrime, copyright, privacy, and educating information professionals about ethics and the electronic environment. Two thought-provoking contributions (curiously placed in different sections) are Douglas Raber’s “Is Universal Service a Universal Right?” and Alistair S. Duff’s “For a New Nanny State.” Both bring earlier discussions of civil liberties and responsibilities to bear on present-day issues.
观点、见解与优先事项:17位领导者畅谈图书馆事业(书评)
组织外的人如何对内部生成的程序进行大部分安全检查是相当可怕的。电子时代的信息伦理论文起源于2002年“21世纪电子信息伦理”研讨会上的演讲。它们以非常严肃的方式处理,正如编辑汤姆·门迪纳(Tom Mendina)所描述的那样,“信息和信息技术似乎经常超出,甚至与它们的创造者的目的相矛盾或相反”(2)。在第一节“非洲”的文章中,这些冲突总是充满政治色彩:发展中国家对土著知识的商业利用;人人享有获取信息的权利;发展中国家与外部世界的联系;以及缺乏支持互联网发展的基础设施。第二节和第三节,“信息组织和信息处理”和“后9 - 11世界的信息问题”,回到了网络犯罪、版权、隐私和教育信息专业人员关于道德和电子环境的更熟悉的领域。两篇发人深省的文章(奇怪地放在不同的章节)是道格拉斯·雷伯的《全民服务是一种普遍权利吗?》以及阿利斯泰尔·s·达夫(Alistair S. Duff)的《为了一个新的保姆国家》。两者都把早期关于公民自由和责任的讨论带到当今的问题上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信