{"title":"Dismantling the Public Sphere: Situating and Sustaining Librarianship in the Age of the New Public Philosophy (review)","authors":"J. Budd","doi":"10.1353/LAC.2006.0039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"public library could be widely supported. The ruling junta, infl uenced by ideas of liberty and democracy, saw education and a public library as positive social ends. Parada argues persuasively that Bernardino Rivadavia edited and added legal provisions to the library’s draft rules, authored by canon and bibliophile Luis José Chorroarín. For several years there were lengthy discussions in the local newspapers about the hours that the “public library” was to maintain. Morning hours were hardly convenient to those who worked during the day. Indeed, the library’s hours were not “liberalized” until well into the nineteenth century. By then the Biblioteca Pública had been transformed into the Biblioteca Nacional. The third document in this book is Juan Luis de Aguirre y Tejada’s “Idea liberal económica sobre el fomento de la biblioteca de ésta capital,” which was serialized in issues of El Grito del Sud (Buenos Aires) in 1812. Parada considers this article the fi rst contribution in Argentine bibliography to the study of libraries. Aguirre was born in Salta in 1753 but grew up and worked as an attorney in Córdoba. Parada analyzes the philosophical and intellectual underpinnings of the work. He notes, moreover, that there is a curious, extensive discussion by Aguirre on the need for local production of paper and an expansion of printing as well as a need to conserve paper items, which are subject to mold and insect damage. Aguirre not only recognized the interdependence of library development and book production but also saw, almost presciently, that book conservation is within the sphere of library work. Parada has linked together three interesting works on the early development of libraries in Argentina. The author provides historical background on each of the works and their authors, addressing wide-ranging themes of eighteenthand nineteenthcentury intellectual history in Europe and the Americas. He offers an exhaustive critical review of the texts and presents a sure-footed delineation of the particular value of the works to Argentine library development. This worthwhile book demonstrates that the whole can indeed be greater than the sum of the individual parts.","PeriodicalId":81853,"journal":{"name":"Libraries & culture","volume":"41 1","pages":"404 - 405"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/LAC.2006.0039","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Libraries & culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/LAC.2006.0039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
public library could be widely supported. The ruling junta, infl uenced by ideas of liberty and democracy, saw education and a public library as positive social ends. Parada argues persuasively that Bernardino Rivadavia edited and added legal provisions to the library’s draft rules, authored by canon and bibliophile Luis José Chorroarín. For several years there were lengthy discussions in the local newspapers about the hours that the “public library” was to maintain. Morning hours were hardly convenient to those who worked during the day. Indeed, the library’s hours were not “liberalized” until well into the nineteenth century. By then the Biblioteca Pública had been transformed into the Biblioteca Nacional. The third document in this book is Juan Luis de Aguirre y Tejada’s “Idea liberal económica sobre el fomento de la biblioteca de ésta capital,” which was serialized in issues of El Grito del Sud (Buenos Aires) in 1812. Parada considers this article the fi rst contribution in Argentine bibliography to the study of libraries. Aguirre was born in Salta in 1753 but grew up and worked as an attorney in Córdoba. Parada analyzes the philosophical and intellectual underpinnings of the work. He notes, moreover, that there is a curious, extensive discussion by Aguirre on the need for local production of paper and an expansion of printing as well as a need to conserve paper items, which are subject to mold and insect damage. Aguirre not only recognized the interdependence of library development and book production but also saw, almost presciently, that book conservation is within the sphere of library work. Parada has linked together three interesting works on the early development of libraries in Argentina. The author provides historical background on each of the works and their authors, addressing wide-ranging themes of eighteenthand nineteenthcentury intellectual history in Europe and the Americas. He offers an exhaustive critical review of the texts and presents a sure-footed delineation of the particular value of the works to Argentine library development. This worthwhile book demonstrates that the whole can indeed be greater than the sum of the individual parts.
公共图书馆可以得到广泛的支持。受自由和民主思想影响的执政军政府将教育和公共图书馆视为积极的社会目标。帕拉达令人信服地认为,Bernardino Rivadavia编辑并添加了图书馆规则草案的法律条款,该草案由教长和藏书家Luis joss Chorroarín撰写。几年来,当地报纸就“公共图书馆”的开放时间进行了长时间的讨论。对于白天工作的人来说,早上的时间几乎不方便。事实上,图书馆的开放时间直到十九世纪才开始“自由化”。那时,图书馆Pública已经变成了国家图书馆。这本书的第三个文件是胡安·路易斯·德·阿吉雷·伊·特哈达的《自由主义思想económica sobre el fomento de la biblioteca de 资本主义文献》,这篇文章于1812年在布宜诺斯艾利斯的el Grito del Sud杂志上连载。帕拉达认为这篇文章是阿根廷目录学对图书馆研究的第一个贡献。阿吉雷于1753年出生在萨尔塔,但在Córdoba长大并担任律师。帕拉达分析了这部作品的哲学和知识基础。此外,他还注意到,Aguirre对纸张在当地生产的必要性、印刷业的扩张以及保存纸张物品的必要性进行了有趣而广泛的讨论,因为纸张容易受到霉菌和昆虫的破坏。阿吉雷不仅认识到图书馆发展和图书生产的相互依存关系,而且几乎有先见之明地看到,图书保护属于图书馆工作的范围。Parada将三个关于阿根廷图书馆早期发展的有趣作品联系在一起。作者提供了每一个作品的历史背景和他们的作者,解决十八和十九世纪欧洲和美洲思想史的广泛主题。他对文本进行了详尽的批判性审查,并对阿根廷图书馆发展的作品的特殊价值进行了可靠的描述。这本有价值的书表明,整体确实可以大于个别部分的总和。