Nitrous oxide for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome: a randomized blinded trial.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Jason Hale, Jijun Xu, Dong Wang, Fabio Rodriguez-Patarroyo, Omer Bakal, Orkun Kopac, Ece Yamak Altinpulluk, Ozkan Onal, Jack E Brooker, Miguel Cruz, Marco Maurtua, Ruben Agudelo-Jimenez, Daniel I Sessler, Alparslan Turan
{"title":"Nitrous oxide for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome: a randomized blinded trial.","authors":"Jason Hale, Jijun Xu, Dong Wang, Fabio Rodriguez-Patarroyo, Omer Bakal, Orkun Kopac, Ece Yamak Altinpulluk, Ozkan Onal, Jack E Brooker, Miguel Cruz, Marco Maurtua, Ruben Agudelo-Jimenez, Daniel I Sessler, Alparslan Turan","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2023-104537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) is a debilitating neuropathic condition often refractory to conventional treatments. N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists have a well-established role in the development and modulation of chronic neuropathic pain. Nitrous oxide is widely used and generally safe anesthetic gas with NMDA receptor antagonist activity. We therefore tested the hypothesis that brief periods of nitrous oxide exposure reduce pain in patients with CRPS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with a diagnosis of CRPS were randomized to either 2 hours of nitrous oxide exposure on three alternating days (Nitrous Oxide) versus a placebo air/oxygen mixture (Air-Oxygen). Our primary outcome was patient-reported pain scores at 1 week and 1 month. Secondary and exploratory outcomes were physical and mental health (PRMOIS-29 v2 survey), specific neuropathic pain symptoms (McGill short-form questionnaire), and opioid consumption.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>44 patients participated in the study; 20 were randomized to Nitrous Oxide and 24 were assigned to Air-Oxygen. Pain scores did not differ significantly, with the estimated difference in means (Nitrous Oxide-Air-Oxygen) of -0.57 (95% CI: -1.42 to 0.28) points, p=0.19. There were also no differences detected in secondary outcomes, with the estimated difference in mean Z-scores for physical health (Nitrous Oxide-Air-Oxygen) of 0.13 (95% CI: -0.16 to 0.43), mental health 0.087 (95% CI: -0.31 to 0.48), and Patient Global Impression of Change score -0.7 (95% CI: -1.85 to 0.46).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with air/oxygen, 2 hours of nitrous oxide/oxygen exposure for three sessions did not provide meaningful therapeutic potential for patients with chronic CRPS. Our results do not support using nitrous oxide for the treatment of CRPS.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"573-580"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11055939/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2023-104537","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) is a debilitating neuropathic condition often refractory to conventional treatments. N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists have a well-established role in the development and modulation of chronic neuropathic pain. Nitrous oxide is widely used and generally safe anesthetic gas with NMDA receptor antagonist activity. We therefore tested the hypothesis that brief periods of nitrous oxide exposure reduce pain in patients with CRPS.

Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of CRPS were randomized to either 2 hours of nitrous oxide exposure on three alternating days (Nitrous Oxide) versus a placebo air/oxygen mixture (Air-Oxygen). Our primary outcome was patient-reported pain scores at 1 week and 1 month. Secondary and exploratory outcomes were physical and mental health (PRMOIS-29 v2 survey), specific neuropathic pain symptoms (McGill short-form questionnaire), and opioid consumption.

Results: 44 patients participated in the study; 20 were randomized to Nitrous Oxide and 24 were assigned to Air-Oxygen. Pain scores did not differ significantly, with the estimated difference in means (Nitrous Oxide-Air-Oxygen) of -0.57 (95% CI: -1.42 to 0.28) points, p=0.19. There were also no differences detected in secondary outcomes, with the estimated difference in mean Z-scores for physical health (Nitrous Oxide-Air-Oxygen) of 0.13 (95% CI: -0.16 to 0.43), mental health 0.087 (95% CI: -0.31 to 0.48), and Patient Global Impression of Change score -0.7 (95% CI: -1.85 to 0.46).

Conclusions: Compared with air/oxygen, 2 hours of nitrous oxide/oxygen exposure for three sessions did not provide meaningful therapeutic potential for patients with chronic CRPS. Our results do not support using nitrous oxide for the treatment of CRPS.

一氧化二氮治疗复杂区域疼痛综合征:一项随机盲法试验。
引言:复杂区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)是一种使人衰弱的神经性疾病,通常难以接受常规治疗。N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)受体拮抗剂在慢性神经性疼痛的发展和调节中具有公认的作用。一氧化二氮是一种广泛使用且通常安全的麻醉气体,具有NMDA受体拮抗剂活性。因此,我们检验了短暂暴露于一氧化二氮可以减轻CRPS患者疼痛的假设 与安慰剂空气/氧气混合物(空气氧气)相比,三天交替暴露一氧化二氮数小时(一氧化二氧)。我们的主要结果是患者报告的疼痛评分为1 周和1 月次要和探索性结果是身心健康(PRMOIS-29 v2调查)、特定的神经性疼痛症状(麦吉尔简短问卷)和阿片类药物消费。结果:44例患者参与了本研究;20人被随机分配到一氧化二氮,24人被分配到空气氧气。疼痛评分没有显著差异,平均值(一氧化二氮-空气-氧气)的估计差异为-0.57(95%置信区间:-1.42至0.28)分,p=0.19。次要结果也没有发现差异,身体健康(一氧化二氮-空气-氧气)的平均Z评分估计差异为0.13(95%CI:-0.16至0.43),心理健康的平均Z分估计差异为0.087(95%CI:-0.31至0.48),患者整体变化印象评分估计差异0.7(95%CI:-1.85至0.46)。结论:与空气/氧气相比,2 三个疗程暴露于氧化亚氮/氧气数小时对慢性CRPS患者没有提供有意义的治疗潜力。我们的研究结果不支持使用一氧化二氮治疗CRPS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信