{"title":"Reframing transitions and contesting memories: The archive and the archival object in Peruvian cinema","authors":"S. Barrow","doi":"10.1386/ncin.13.1.23_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article considers the stories behind the production and screening of two very different Peruvian films that reveal much about the way the archive, the archival object and archival fragment have worked to disrupt and force a reconsideration of key moments in Peruvian political history of the twentieth century. One, a feature film by Francisco Lombardi, Ojos que no ven/Eyes That Don’t See (2003), provides a provocative perspective on the impact of the televisual revelations of the corruption at the heart of President Fujimori’s government (1990–2000). The second, a documentary made by Kurt Hermann at the behest of the military, Alerta en la Frontera/Border Alert (1941) offers a patriotic recording of the border campaign against Ecuador, which was banned at the time and had its first public screening 70 years later. This analysis suggests that the delay in viewing events of such national importance forces not only a reconsideration of those events and their disruptive effect on a collective, official sense of national history and identity but also a questioning of the way that contemporary political figures and events might be considered. This article also takes account of the key role of Peru’s national film archive in shaping the nature of national heritage, culture and memory.","PeriodicalId":38663,"journal":{"name":"New Cinemas","volume":"13 1","pages":"23-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1386/ncin.13.1.23_1","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Cinemas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/ncin.13.1.23_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This article considers the stories behind the production and screening of two very different Peruvian films that reveal much about the way the archive, the archival object and archival fragment have worked to disrupt and force a reconsideration of key moments in Peruvian political history of the twentieth century. One, a feature film by Francisco Lombardi, Ojos que no ven/Eyes That Don’t See (2003), provides a provocative perspective on the impact of the televisual revelations of the corruption at the heart of President Fujimori’s government (1990–2000). The second, a documentary made by Kurt Hermann at the behest of the military, Alerta en la Frontera/Border Alert (1941) offers a patriotic recording of the border campaign against Ecuador, which was banned at the time and had its first public screening 70 years later. This analysis suggests that the delay in viewing events of such national importance forces not only a reconsideration of those events and their disruptive effect on a collective, official sense of national history and identity but also a questioning of the way that contemporary political figures and events might be considered. This article also takes account of the key role of Peru’s national film archive in shaping the nature of national heritage, culture and memory.
本文探讨两部截然不同的秘鲁电影制作与放映背后的故事,揭示档案、档案物件与档案片段如何扰乱并迫使人们重新思考二十世纪秘鲁政治史上的关键时刻。其中一部是弗朗西斯科·隆巴迪(Francisco Lombardi)的长篇电影《看不见的眼睛》(Ojos que no ven/Eyes That Don’t See)(2003),它以一种挑衅的视角,揭示了藤森总统政府(1990-2000)核心腐败的电视曝光所带来的影响。第二部是库尔特·赫尔曼(Kurt Hermann)应军方要求拍摄的纪录片《边境警戒》(Alerta en la Frontera/Border Alert)(1941年),讲述了对厄瓜多尔边境行动的爱国记录,这部影片当时被禁,70年后才首次公开放映。这一分析表明,推迟观看具有如此国家重要性的事件,不仅迫使人们重新考虑这些事件及其对国家历史和身份的集体官方意识的破坏性影响,而且还迫使人们质疑可能考虑的当代政治人物和事件的方式。本文还考虑到秘鲁国家电影资料馆在塑造国家遗产、文化和记忆的本质方面的关键作用。