E-poetry : Between image and performance, a cultural analysis

IF 0.5 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
J. Looy, Jan Beatens
{"title":"E-poetry : Between image and performance, a cultural analysis","authors":"J. Looy, Jan Beatens","doi":"10.1349/PS1.1938-6060.A.288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From a cultural studies point of view, electronic or e-poetry is more than just an \"object,\" a \"genre,\" or a \"medium;\" it is a cultural practice or a \"cultural form\" in Raymond Williams' words (1975). In this paper, we will tackle some of the issues raised by such a perspective, which will be cultural rather than technological and our starting point will be the relative ignorance toward e-poetry as a form. Indeed, compared to similar evolutions in other media, e-poetry is not only in quantitative terms small business - there has been no global shift from poetry in print to e-poetry as there has been, for instance, in photography or music - it is also in critical terms marginal and hardly researched, let alone thoroughly analyzed and described. E-poetry exists, but it hardly receives any critical attention compared to traditional, printed poetry. We can only regret this lack of interest, but unless we would assume that the e-poetry form is a non-entity reducible to a mere story of high-tech gadgetry deprived of any literary value, we can give no single answer to those willing to valorize or reject the literary and cultural importance of e-poetry. Actually, one can give two rather different answers and as we will try to show, one has to make a choice between them. Hence the aim of this article is threefold: first, to define the two major positions one can adopt when studying e-poetry (Part I); second, to give a more detailed presentation of e-poetry as a cultural form (Part II); and third, to illustrate the way in which e-poetry and print culture interact (Part III).","PeriodicalId":44420,"journal":{"name":"Digital Humanities Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Humanities Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1349/PS1.1938-6060.A.288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

From a cultural studies point of view, electronic or e-poetry is more than just an "object," a "genre," or a "medium;" it is a cultural practice or a "cultural form" in Raymond Williams' words (1975). In this paper, we will tackle some of the issues raised by such a perspective, which will be cultural rather than technological and our starting point will be the relative ignorance toward e-poetry as a form. Indeed, compared to similar evolutions in other media, e-poetry is not only in quantitative terms small business - there has been no global shift from poetry in print to e-poetry as there has been, for instance, in photography or music - it is also in critical terms marginal and hardly researched, let alone thoroughly analyzed and described. E-poetry exists, but it hardly receives any critical attention compared to traditional, printed poetry. We can only regret this lack of interest, but unless we would assume that the e-poetry form is a non-entity reducible to a mere story of high-tech gadgetry deprived of any literary value, we can give no single answer to those willing to valorize or reject the literary and cultural importance of e-poetry. Actually, one can give two rather different answers and as we will try to show, one has to make a choice between them. Hence the aim of this article is threefold: first, to define the two major positions one can adopt when studying e-poetry (Part I); second, to give a more detailed presentation of e-poetry as a cultural form (Part II); and third, to illustrate the way in which e-poetry and print culture interact (Part III).
电子诗歌:影像与表现之间的文化分析
从文化研究的角度来看,电子或电子诗歌不仅仅是一种“对象”,一种“类型”或一种“媒介”;用雷蒙德·威廉姆斯的话来说,它是一种文化实践或“文化形式”(1975)。在本文中,我们将解决由这种观点引起的一些问题,这将是文化而不是技术,我们的出发点将是对电子诗歌作为一种形式的相对无知。事实上,与其他媒体的类似演变相比,电子诗歌不仅在数量上是小生意——没有像摄影或音乐那样,从印刷诗歌到电子诗歌的全球转变——在关键方面,它也是边缘的,几乎没有研究,更不用说彻底的分析和描述了。电子诗歌确实存在,但与传统的印刷诗歌相比,它几乎没有受到任何批评。我们只能对这种缺乏兴趣感到遗憾,但除非我们假设电子诗歌形式是一种非实体,可以简化为一个没有任何文学价值的高科技小玩意的故事,否则我们无法对那些愿意珍视或拒绝电子诗歌在文学和文化上重要性的人给出单一的答案。实际上,一个人可以给出两种截然不同的答案,正如我们将试图展示的那样,一个人必须在它们之间做出选择。因此,本文的目的有三个:首先,界定研究电子诗歌时可以采取的两种主要立场(第一部分);第二,更详细地介绍电子诗歌作为一种文化形式(第二部分);第三,说明电子诗歌和印刷文化互动的方式(第三部分)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Digital Humanities Quarterly
Digital Humanities Quarterly HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信