{"title":"Software-assisted harmonic function discrimination","authors":"V. J. Manzo","doi":"10.1386/JMTE.7.1.23_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Determining the function of chords within a diatonic key can be difficult, especially for those listeners who do not regularly play instruments capable of producing chords. Software-based instruments, however, can allow an individual to play chords by pressing a single button as opposed to plucking several strings or pressing several keys. This quantitative study addressed two research questions: to what extent is a software-based musical instrument able to assist individuals in recognizing chord-contexts to the extent that traditional chordal instruments do? In what ways does a software-based musical instrument compare to a traditional chordal instrument as a viable aid for assisting individuals in chord-determination activities? In this Pre-/Post-test designed study, two groups of undergraduate music majors using either a chordal instrument or a softwareinstrument completed activities that emphasized understanding chord progressions. Results were compared within the groups and between groups. Both groups improved to some extent and there was no significant difference between the improvements within both groups overall, suggesting that the software instrument was as viable a mechanism for supporting the musical task as the traditional instrument. Additionally, the data suggest that the ability to recognize two of the five progressions, the vi IV I V and the I V vi IV, improved significantly in the experimental group but not in the control group.","PeriodicalId":42410,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Music Technology & Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1386/JMTE.7.1.23_1","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Music Technology & Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/JMTE.7.1.23_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Determining the function of chords within a diatonic key can be difficult, especially for those listeners who do not regularly play instruments capable of producing chords. Software-based instruments, however, can allow an individual to play chords by pressing a single button as opposed to plucking several strings or pressing several keys. This quantitative study addressed two research questions: to what extent is a software-based musical instrument able to assist individuals in recognizing chord-contexts to the extent that traditional chordal instruments do? In what ways does a software-based musical instrument compare to a traditional chordal instrument as a viable aid for assisting individuals in chord-determination activities? In this Pre-/Post-test designed study, two groups of undergraduate music majors using either a chordal instrument or a softwareinstrument completed activities that emphasized understanding chord progressions. Results were compared within the groups and between groups. Both groups improved to some extent and there was no significant difference between the improvements within both groups overall, suggesting that the software instrument was as viable a mechanism for supporting the musical task as the traditional instrument. Additionally, the data suggest that the ability to recognize two of the five progressions, the vi IV I V and the I V vi IV, improved significantly in the experimental group but not in the control group.
确定全音阶中和弦的功能是很困难的,特别是对于那些不经常演奏能够产生和弦的乐器的听众。然而,基于软件的乐器可以允许个人通过按一个按钮来演奏和弦,而不是拨动几根弦或按几个键。这项定量研究解决了两个研究问题:在多大程度上,基于软件的乐器能够帮助个人识别和弦上下文,达到传统和弦乐器的程度?软件乐器与传统和弦乐器相比,在帮助个人确定和弦活动方面有哪些可行的帮助?在这项前/后测试设计的研究中,两组音乐专业的本科生使用和弦乐器或软件乐器完成强调理解和弦进行的活动。比较组内及组间结果。两组都在一定程度上有所改善,两组整体上的改善没有显著差异,这表明软件乐器与传统乐器一样是支持音乐任务的可行机制。此外,数据表明,识别五种进展中的两种,即vi IV IV和IV vi IV的能力在实验组显著提高,而在对照组则没有提高。