UNCERTAIN EFFECTS OF SHOCKS VS. UNCERTAIN UNIT ROOT: AN ALTERNATIVE VIEW OF U.S. REAL GDP

IF 0.2 4区 经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS
Yu-Lieh Huang, Chao-Hsi Huang
{"title":"UNCERTAIN EFFECTS OF SHOCKS VS. UNCERTAIN UNIT ROOT: AN ALTERNATIVE VIEW OF U.S. REAL GDP","authors":"Yu-Lieh Huang, Chao-Hsi Huang","doi":"10.15057/27191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Instead of exploring the uncertainty about the existence of a unit root in the long-span U.S. real GDP series as in previous studies, e.g., Rudebusch (1993), in this study we investigate the uncertainty about the state (permanence vs. transitoriness) of the output shock period by period by using the “innovation regime-switching” (IRS) model. In this model the effect of a shock may be permanent or transitory in different time periods. By applying the IRS model to the 1870-2008 annual U.S. real GDP data, we find that the output shocks in the periods of the 1893 depression, the 1907 financial panic, the two World Wars and the Great Depression are likely to have had a large but transitory effect, whereas the output shocks in the remaining periods are likely to have had a permanent effect. This result suggests that the long span real GDP is neither a unit-root series nor a trend-stationary series.","PeriodicalId":43705,"journal":{"name":"Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics","volume":"56 1","pages":"117-134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15057/27191","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Instead of exploring the uncertainty about the existence of a unit root in the long-span U.S. real GDP series as in previous studies, e.g., Rudebusch (1993), in this study we investigate the uncertainty about the state (permanence vs. transitoriness) of the output shock period by period by using the “innovation regime-switching” (IRS) model. In this model the effect of a shock may be permanent or transitory in different time periods. By applying the IRS model to the 1870-2008 annual U.S. real GDP data, we find that the output shocks in the periods of the 1893 depression, the 1907 financial panic, the two World Wars and the Great Depression are likely to have had a large but transitory effect, whereas the output shocks in the remaining periods are likely to have had a permanent effect. This result suggests that the long span real GDP is neither a unit-root series nor a trend-stationary series.
不确定的冲击效应vs不确定的单位根:美国实际GDP的另一种观点
与以往的研究(如Rudebusch(1993))不同,本研究采用“创新制度切换”(IRS)模型,逐期研究产出冲击状态(持久性与暂时性)的不确定性。在这个模型中,冲击的影响在不同的时间段内可能是永久性的,也可能是暂时性的。通过将IRS模型应用于1870-2008年美国年度实际GDP数据,我们发现1893年大萧条、1907年金融恐慌、两次世界大战和大萧条时期的产出冲击可能产生了巨大但短暂的影响,而其余时期的产出冲击可能产生了永久性的影响。这一结果表明,长跨度实际GDP既不是单位根序列,也不是趋势平稳序列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信