Lost Causes: Confederate Demobilization and the Making of Veteran Identity by Bradley R. Clampitt (review)

IF 0.2 Q4 HISTORY
{"title":"Lost Causes: Confederate Demobilization and the Making of Veteran Identity by Bradley R. Clampitt (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/khs.2022.a899967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his Lost Causes: Confederate Demobilization and the Making of Veteran Identity, Bradley R. Clampitt tackles two myths about the post-Civil War South. First, he corrects the Lost Cause narrative concerning Confederate demobilization during the summer of 1865. That myth stressed that thousands of “penniless and starving” Confederate soldiers were forced by their haughty and vindictive conquerors to walk hundreds of miles home, helped only by “proud southern civilians” (p. 2). But Clampitt shows that the situation was much more complex. Second, the book contradicts scholars who claim that the Lost Cause surfaced fifteen years after the war as part of a broader movement of commemoration following Reconstruction. Clampitt instead contends that the Lost Cause was the immediate coping mechanism created by Confederate veterans in 1865. To set the record straight, he examined some 1,100 first-hand accounts, a mix of wartime letters and diaries, postwar memoirs, and other reports. Based on his evidence, he argues that while “the war itself solidified the common principles of Confederate soldiers and rendered them perpetual Rebels,” the experiences of “defeat and demobilization reinforced that identity and hardened the recalcitrant, unapologetic attitudes of southern veterans” (p. 14). In the first section of the book, Clampitt details both systems put into place by Union and Confederate leadership to facilitate demobilization and the subsequent failures of those plans. Upon Lee’s surrender at Appomattox, Clampitt notes, the Union Army worked to distribute parole papers to Confederate veterans, which would allow them to draw rations from the army while travelling home. Neither side wished for chaos or prolonged demobilization. Where available, the Union facilitated river and railroad transportation for returning soldiers and even gave mules to some. But several factors complicated these plans. The main Confederate armies, for example,","PeriodicalId":40382,"journal":{"name":"Register of the Kentucky Historical Society","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Register of the Kentucky Historical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/khs.2022.a899967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In his Lost Causes: Confederate Demobilization and the Making of Veteran Identity, Bradley R. Clampitt tackles two myths about the post-Civil War South. First, he corrects the Lost Cause narrative concerning Confederate demobilization during the summer of 1865. That myth stressed that thousands of “penniless and starving” Confederate soldiers were forced by their haughty and vindictive conquerors to walk hundreds of miles home, helped only by “proud southern civilians” (p. 2). But Clampitt shows that the situation was much more complex. Second, the book contradicts scholars who claim that the Lost Cause surfaced fifteen years after the war as part of a broader movement of commemoration following Reconstruction. Clampitt instead contends that the Lost Cause was the immediate coping mechanism created by Confederate veterans in 1865. To set the record straight, he examined some 1,100 first-hand accounts, a mix of wartime letters and diaries, postwar memoirs, and other reports. Based on his evidence, he argues that while “the war itself solidified the common principles of Confederate soldiers and rendered them perpetual Rebels,” the experiences of “defeat and demobilization reinforced that identity and hardened the recalcitrant, unapologetic attitudes of southern veterans” (p. 14). In the first section of the book, Clampitt details both systems put into place by Union and Confederate leadership to facilitate demobilization and the subsequent failures of those plans. Upon Lee’s surrender at Appomattox, Clampitt notes, the Union Army worked to distribute parole papers to Confederate veterans, which would allow them to draw rations from the army while travelling home. Neither side wished for chaos or prolonged demobilization. Where available, the Union facilitated river and railroad transportation for returning soldiers and even gave mules to some. But several factors complicated these plans. The main Confederate armies, for example,
《失去的原因:邦联复员与退伍军人身份的形成》,作者:布拉德利·r·克拉姆皮特
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书