Efficiency of microfinance institutions of South Asia: a bootstrap DEA approach

IF 0.4 Q4 ECONOMICS
Rachita Gulati, A. Khan
{"title":"Efficiency of microfinance institutions of South Asia: a bootstrap DEA approach","authors":"Rachita Gulati, A. Khan","doi":"10.1504/ijcee.2021.10033213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The microfinance institutions (MFIs) operate with the dual goals; financial sustainability and social outreach. Therefore, the present paper aims to assess the twin objectives of MFIs operating in the selected four South Asian countries (i.e., Bangladesh, India, Nepal and Pakistan) during the financial year 2010 to 2015. First, we remove the outliers from the dataset by following Banker and Gifford (1988) and Banker and Chang (2006) guidelines. Thereafter, the study use bootstrap data envelopment analysis (DEA) by designing two separate models to measure bias-corrected financial and social efficiency estimates. The empirical results confirm that the South Asian MFIs remain more financially efficient than socially during the study period. Further, the Indian MFIs outperform in terms of both the aspects followed by Nepali and Bangladeshi MFIs, respectively. However, the Pakistani MFIs are the least performers in terms of both social outreach and financial sustainability. economists and her research interests include efficiency and productivity analysis using frontier approaches. Her research work focuses on financial economics in India and bears important policy implications for further reforms in the financial sector in India. She has published research papers in journals of national and international repute.","PeriodicalId":42342,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computational Economics and Econometrics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computational Economics and Econometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijcee.2021.10033213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

: The microfinance institutions (MFIs) operate with the dual goals; financial sustainability and social outreach. Therefore, the present paper aims to assess the twin objectives of MFIs operating in the selected four South Asian countries (i.e., Bangladesh, India, Nepal and Pakistan) during the financial year 2010 to 2015. First, we remove the outliers from the dataset by following Banker and Gifford (1988) and Banker and Chang (2006) guidelines. Thereafter, the study use bootstrap data envelopment analysis (DEA) by designing two separate models to measure bias-corrected financial and social efficiency estimates. The empirical results confirm that the South Asian MFIs remain more financially efficient than socially during the study period. Further, the Indian MFIs outperform in terms of both the aspects followed by Nepali and Bangladeshi MFIs, respectively. However, the Pakistani MFIs are the least performers in terms of both social outreach and financial sustainability. economists and her research interests include efficiency and productivity analysis using frontier approaches. Her research work focuses on financial economics in India and bears important policy implications for further reforms in the financial sector in India. She has published research papers in journals of national and international repute.
南亚小额信贷机构的效率:一个自举DEA方法
小额信贷机构的运作具有双重目标;财政可持续性和社会拓展。因此,本文旨在评估小额信贷机构在2010年至2015年财政年度在选定的四个南亚国家(即孟加拉国、印度、尼泊尔和巴基斯坦)开展业务的双重目标。首先,我们遵循Banker和Gifford(1988)以及Banker和Chang(2006)的指导方针,从数据集中去除异常值。随后,本研究通过设计两个独立的模型,使用自举数据包络分析(DEA)来测量偏差校正后的金融和社会效率估计。实证结果证实,南亚小额信贷机构在研究期间的财务效率高于社会效率。此外,印度小额信贷机构在这两个方面的表现都优于尼泊尔和孟加拉国小额信贷机构。然而,巴基斯坦小额信贷机构在社会拓展和财务可持续性方面表现最差。经济学家和她的研究兴趣包括使用前沿方法进行效率和生产力分析。她的研究工作主要集中在印度的金融经济学,对印度金融部门的进一步改革具有重要的政策意义。她曾在国内和国际知名期刊上发表研究论文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: IJCEE explores the intersection of economics, econometrics and computation. It investigates the application of recent computational techniques to all branches of economic modelling, both theoretical and empirical. IJCEE aims at an international and multidisciplinary standing, promoting rigorous quantitative examination of relevant economic issues and policy analyses. The journal''s research areas include computational economic modelling, computational econometrics and statistics and simulation methods. It is an internationally competitive, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to stimulating discussion at the forefront of economic and econometric research. Topics covered include: -Computational Economics: Computational techniques applied to economic problems and policies, Agent-based modelling, Control and game theory, General equilibrium models, Optimisation methods, Economic dynamics, Software development and implementation, -Econometrics: Applied micro and macro econometrics, Monte Carlo simulation, Robustness and sensitivity analysis, Bayesian econometrics, Time series analysis and forecasting techniques, Operational research methods with applications to economics, Software development and implementation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信