Reliability assessment of pressure vessel design methods

Q2 Engineering
L. Hongjun, Yang Peng, Xun Huang, Yang Hui
{"title":"Reliability assessment of pressure vessel design methods","authors":"L. Hongjun, Yang Peng, Xun Huang, Yang Hui","doi":"10.1504/IJRS.2019.10017889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several pressure vessel design methods based on elastic analysis and elastic-plastic analysis are available to designers. This paper proposes a reliability analysis method to assess three pressure vessel design methods: Stress Categorisation Method (SCM), Limit-Load Analysis (LIMIT) in ASME code and DBA-L method which was recently proposed by present authors. It was concluded that with the same input variables into the three analyses, the responses of calculated results of three method were different, which provided an effective guidance to assess and choose the proper design method in engineering practice.","PeriodicalId":39031,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Reliability and Safety","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Reliability and Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRS.2019.10017889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Several pressure vessel design methods based on elastic analysis and elastic-plastic analysis are available to designers. This paper proposes a reliability analysis method to assess three pressure vessel design methods: Stress Categorisation Method (SCM), Limit-Load Analysis (LIMIT) in ASME code and DBA-L method which was recently proposed by present authors. It was concluded that with the same input variables into the three analyses, the responses of calculated results of three method were different, which provided an effective guidance to assess and choose the proper design method in engineering practice.
压力容器可靠性评估设计方法
有几种基于弹性分析和弹塑性分析的压力容器设计方法可供设计人员使用。本文对应力分类法(SCM)、ASME规范中的极限载荷分析法(LIMIT)和作者最近提出的DBA-L法三种压力容器设计方法进行了可靠性分析。结果表明,在三种分析输入变量相同的情况下,三种方法计算结果的响应是不同的,为工程实践中评估和选择合适的设计方法提供了有效的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Reliability and Safety
International Journal of Reliability and Safety Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信