Análisis perceptual del proceso de transferencia de conocimiento en maderas a instituciones en Costa Rica

Q4 Environmental Science
Lupita Vargas-Fonseca, Juan Carlos Valverde-Otárola, Diego Camacho-Cornejo, Cinthya Salas-Garita, Alexander Berrocal-Jiménez
{"title":"Análisis perceptual del proceso de transferencia de conocimiento en maderas a instituciones en Costa Rica","authors":"Lupita Vargas-Fonseca, Juan Carlos Valverde-Otárola, Diego Camacho-Cornejo, Cinthya Salas-Garita, Alexander Berrocal-Jiménez","doi":"10.14483/2256201X.15347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The transfer of knowledge in wood technology in state institutions of Costa Rica was perceptually analyzed. Conducting active-passive training in topics of drying, preserving and quality of wood, using three learning assessments (precursor, post-course and 30 weeks post-course); the perception, knowledge acquired and limitations of the systems used were evaluated. Obtaining a great similarity between the topics of drying and preserving with previous knowledge over 65 %, learning of 85 % and knowledge retention of 75 %, different from the quality theme that presented a previous knowledge of 20 %, learning of 83.5 % and 75.6 % retention; The subjects of drying and preserved the best perception, considered as simple, applicable useful and understandable, while quality was considered complicated, complex, irrelevant but useful. Finally, Análisis perceptual del proceso de transferencia de conocimiento en maderas a instituciones en Costa Rica Vargas-Fonseca, L., VaLVerde, J. c., camacho-corneJo, d., saLas-garita, c. y BerrocaL-Jiménez, a. Colombia Forestal • ISSN 0120-0739 • e-ISSN 2256-201X • Bogotá-Colombia • Vol. 24 No. 1 • Enero-Junio de 2021 • pp. 17-30 [ 18 ] it was found that drying and preserving learning should be a 50-50 % combination between theory and practice; while the quality should be 25-75 % theory-practice.","PeriodicalId":37690,"journal":{"name":"Colombia Forestal","volume":"57 1","pages":"17-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colombia Forestal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14483/2256201X.15347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The transfer of knowledge in wood technology in state institutions of Costa Rica was perceptually analyzed. Conducting active-passive training in topics of drying, preserving and quality of wood, using three learning assessments (precursor, post-course and 30 weeks post-course); the perception, knowledge acquired and limitations of the systems used were evaluated. Obtaining a great similarity between the topics of drying and preserving with previous knowledge over 65 %, learning of 85 % and knowledge retention of 75 %, different from the quality theme that presented a previous knowledge of 20 %, learning of 83.5 % and 75.6 % retention; The subjects of drying and preserved the best perception, considered as simple, applicable useful and understandable, while quality was considered complicated, complex, irrelevant but useful. Finally, Análisis perceptual del proceso de transferencia de conocimiento en maderas a instituciones en Costa Rica Vargas-Fonseca, L., VaLVerde, J. c., camacho-corneJo, d., saLas-garita, c. y BerrocaL-Jiménez, a. Colombia Forestal • ISSN 0120-0739 • e-ISSN 2256-201X • Bogotá-Colombia • Vol. 24 No. 1 • Enero-Junio de 2021 • pp. 17-30 [ 18 ] it was found that drying and preserving learning should be a 50-50 % combination between theory and practice; while the quality should be 25-75 % theory-practice.
对哥斯达黎加木材知识向机构转移过程的感知分析
在哥斯达黎加的国家机构木材技术的知识转移进行了感性分析。进行木材干燥、保存和质量主题的主动-被动培训,采用三种学习评估(课程前、课程后和课程后30周);评估了所使用系统的感知、获得的知识和局限性。与质量主题相比,干燥和保存主题与已有知识的相似性大于65%,学习的相似性大于85%,知识保留率为75%,与已有知识的相似性为20%,学习的相似性为83.5%,保留率为75.6%;被试对干燥和保存的感知最好,被认为是简单、适用、有用和可理解的,而质量被认为是复杂、复杂、无关但有用的。最后,Análisis哥斯达黎加机构间经济转移的感知模型过程Vargas-Fonseca, L., VaLVerde, J. c., camacho-corneJo, d., saLas-garita, c. y berrocal - jimacimnez, a.哥伦比亚森林•ISSN 0120-0739•e-ISSN 2256-201X•Bogotá-Colombia•Vol. 24 No. 1•Enero-Junio de 2021•pp. 17-30[18]发现干燥和保存学习应该是理论与实践之间50- 50%的结合;而质量应达到理论实践的25- 75%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Colombia Forestal
Colombia Forestal Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Colombia Forestal Journal publishes original manuscripts on themes of the forest field and various aspects of natural resources and the environment, which are discriminated in the categories of research article, review, reflection and technical notes of agreement with the stipulations of COLCIENCIAS for scientific publications. According to the classification of scientific areas of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Colombia Forestal Journal belongs to the large area of Agricultural Sciences (4), Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (4A) and to the discipline Forestry (4A02). Since its creation in 1978, the journal has been edited and published by the Francisco José de Caldas District University with headquarters in Bogotá. The quality of the content of the journal has been strengthened with the collaboration of national and international external evaluators in a double blind arbitration system and the dissemination has been extended by publishing manuscripts in a language different from Spanish and with inclusion in bibliographical databases such as Scopus. , DOAJ, Scielo, Redalyc, Ebsco, CAB Abstracts of CAB International, Forestry Abstracts, Ulrich''s, Latindex, Publindex. Likewise, it has academic profiles at Mendeley, Academia and Researchgate. The articles that are submitted to Colombia Forestal Journal must be original and unpublished and have not been postulated in other journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信