Equalizing Opportunities for Women in Electoral Politics in Ireland

K. Knight, Yvonne Galligan, U. N. G. Choille
{"title":"Equalizing Opportunities for Women in Electoral Politics in Ireland","authors":"K. Knight, Yvonne Galligan, U. N. G. Choille","doi":"10.1300/J014v26n01_01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper examines the attitudes of women political elites in Ireland toward positive action initiatives that would assist in increasing women's legislative presence. An earlier study isolated family responsibilities and lack of finance as significant barriers for Irish women wishing to enter, and stay in, political life. In addition, scholarly and policy debates on boosting women's parliamentary representation focus on manipulating electoral or party selection rules along with strategies for making a political career more compatible with women's socially determined responsibilities. This paper examines how Irish women politicians respond to various suggestions for positive action in these three arenas: combining legislative and family responsibilities, funding a political campaign and getting elected. The paper highlights the broad consensus among women politicians, irrespective of party, self-interest, or length of service, favoring certain positive action initiatives, as well as their reluctance to support other options. It also illustrates the complexity of implementing some of these reforms. In addition, the paper emphasizes how cultural expectations and values act to inhibit women's political agency.","PeriodicalId":83535,"journal":{"name":"Women & politics","volume":"26 1","pages":"1 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J014v26n01_01","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women & politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J014v26n01_01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines the attitudes of women political elites in Ireland toward positive action initiatives that would assist in increasing women's legislative presence. An earlier study isolated family responsibilities and lack of finance as significant barriers for Irish women wishing to enter, and stay in, political life. In addition, scholarly and policy debates on boosting women's parliamentary representation focus on manipulating electoral or party selection rules along with strategies for making a political career more compatible with women's socially determined responsibilities. This paper examines how Irish women politicians respond to various suggestions for positive action in these three arenas: combining legislative and family responsibilities, funding a political campaign and getting elected. The paper highlights the broad consensus among women politicians, irrespective of party, self-interest, or length of service, favoring certain positive action initiatives, as well as their reluctance to support other options. It also illustrates the complexity of implementing some of these reforms. In addition, the paper emphasizes how cultural expectations and values act to inhibit women's political agency.
爱尔兰妇女在选举政治中的平等机会
摘要本文考察了爱尔兰女性政治精英对积极行动倡议的态度,这些倡议将有助于增加女性的立法存在。早期的一项研究认为,家庭责任和缺乏经济能力是爱尔兰妇女希望进入并留在政治生活中的重大障碍。此外,关于增加妇女议会代表的学术和政策辩论侧重于操纵选举或政党选择规则,以及使政治生涯更符合妇女社会决定的责任的战略。本文考察了爱尔兰女性政治家如何回应在以下三个领域采取积极行动的各种建议:将立法和家庭责任结合起来,资助政治运动和当选。该报告强调,不论党派、自身利益或服务年限,女性政治家普遍赞同某些积极行动倡议,同时不愿支持其他选择。它还说明了实施其中一些改革的复杂性。此外,本文还强调了文化期望和价值观如何抑制女性的政治能动性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信