Elite coaches’ approach to quantifying technical actions and relative participation in volleyball players’ performance

IF 0.5 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES
Carlos López-Serrano, M. P. Moreno, Daniel Mon-López, Juan José Molina-Martín
{"title":"Elite coaches’ approach to quantifying technical actions and relative participation in volleyball players’ performance","authors":"Carlos López-Serrano, M. P. Moreno, Daniel Mon-López, Juan José Molina-Martín","doi":"10.14198/jhse.2023.182.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study sought to identify elite coaches’ perception of the importance of technical actions and the consideration of relative participation to measure individual volleyball players’ performance. An instrument was elaborated to gather the opinions of elite coaches on the importance of technical actions reported by the data volley (excluding setting), as well as considering relative participation. Twenty elite coaches with at least three years of experience in national teams or top leagues participated in the study. Variables considered in the study were analysed using descriptive statistics and reliability was measured with Cronbach’s α and McDonald’s Omega coefficients (> .70). The results assessed the importance of sco ring actions, which received values of (1 point). All errors (terminal and continuity) were scored with (−1). Non -scoring actions were given values [.00, .80], except for poor attack (−.35), poor serve (−.60), free freeball (−.60) and reception free (−.50) . Relative participation was considered according to the percentage of points and/or contacts played by each athlete. We concluded that for the player’s points and/or contacts, priority is given to actions that win points directly or are excellent, followed by those that contribute to building comfortable attacks, while penalising errors.","PeriodicalId":51651,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Sport and Exercise","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Sport and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2023.182.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study sought to identify elite coaches’ perception of the importance of technical actions and the consideration of relative participation to measure individual volleyball players’ performance. An instrument was elaborated to gather the opinions of elite coaches on the importance of technical actions reported by the data volley (excluding setting), as well as considering relative participation. Twenty elite coaches with at least three years of experience in national teams or top leagues participated in the study. Variables considered in the study were analysed using descriptive statistics and reliability was measured with Cronbach’s α and McDonald’s Omega coefficients (> .70). The results assessed the importance of sco ring actions, which received values of (1 point). All errors (terminal and continuity) were scored with (−1). Non -scoring actions were given values [.00, .80], except for poor attack (−.35), poor serve (−.60), free freeball (−.60) and reception free (−.50) . Relative participation was considered according to the percentage of points and/or contacts played by each athlete. We concluded that for the player’s points and/or contacts, priority is given to actions that win points directly or are excellent, followed by those that contribute to building comfortable attacks, while penalising errors.
精英教练对排球运动员技术动作及相关参与的量化方法
本研究旨在找出优秀教练对技术动作重要性的认知,以及相对参与的考量,以衡量排球运动员的个人表现。制定了一个工具,收集精英教练对数据截击(不包括设置)报告的技术行动的重要性的意见,并考虑相对参与。20名在国家队或顶级联赛至少有三年经验的优秀教练参与了这项研究。采用描述性统计对研究中考虑的变量进行分析,并采用Cronbach 's α和McDonald 's Omega系数(>.70)测量信度。结果评估了sco环动作的重要性,其值为(1分)。所有误差(终末误差和连续性误差)均以(−1)评分。非评分行为被赋值[。00, 0.80],除了进攻(- 0.35),发球(- 0.60),自由任意球(- 0.60)和接球自由(- 0.50)。相对参与是根据每个运动员的分数和/或接触的百分比来考虑的。我们的结论是,对于玩家的积分和/或联系人来说,优先考虑的是直接赢得积分或表现出色的行动,其次是那些有助于建立舒适攻击的行动,同时惩罚错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: JHSE contributes to the continuing professional development of sport and exercise sciences, including a high-level research in biomechanics, exercise physiology, sports history, nutrition, and a wide range of social and ethical issues in physical activity, and other aspects of sports medicine related quality of life and biophysical investigation of sports performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信