Scale-dependent effects of grazing on the species richness of alkaline and sand grasslands

IF 1.1 4区 生物学 Q3 PLANT SCIENCES
Tuexenia Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.14471/2017.37.016
Laura Godó, O. Valkó, B. Tóthmérész, P. Török, A. Kelemen, B. Deák
{"title":"Scale-dependent effects of grazing on the species richness of alkaline and sand grasslands","authors":"Laura Godó, O. Valkó, B. Tóthmérész, P. Török, A. Kelemen, B. Deák","doi":"10.14471/2017.37.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extensively managed pastures harbour rare and endangered species and have a decisive role in maintaining grassland biodiversity. Traditional herding of local robust cattle breeds is considered as a feasible tool for preserving these habitats. We studied the scale-dependent effects of grazing on the species richness and composition of three dry grassland types in the Great Hungarian Plain: Achilleo setaceae-Festucetum pseudovinae and Artemisio santonici-Festucetum pseudovinae alkaline grasslands, and Potentillo arenariae-Festucetum pseudovinae sand grassland. We asked the following questions: (1) Does extensive grazing have a scale-dependent effect on plant species richness of alkaline and sand grasslands? (2) How does grazing affect the proportion of specialists, generalists and weeds in the three grassland types? We sampled ten sites of each grassland type, including five extensively grazed and five non-grazed sites (altogether we had 30 sites). We used a series of nested plots each consisting of 10 plots from the size of 0.01 m² to 16 m². We revealed that grazing has contrasting effects in the three grassland types, and had a considerable effect on their species richness even at small scales. In both alkaline grassland types, total species richness was overall higher in grazed plots but it increased in a similar manner for both ungrazed and grazed habitats across plot sizes. Small-scale heterogeneity likely due to the uneven distribution of grazing, trampling and defecation together with mitigated rate of competition allowed more species to co-exist even at small scales in grazed alkaline grasslands. Grazing increased the richness of specialists, but likely due to the salt stress, establishment of weeds was hampered. Open gaps formed by trampling likely supported the establishment of several specialist species such as Plantago tenuiflora and Puccinellia limosa which are typical to open alkali grasslands. Contrary, in sand grasslands, we did not detect any effect of grazing on total species richness, likely due to the adverse effect of grazing on the species richness of specialists and weeds. In contrast with the former findings we detected significantly higher species richness in 0.01 m² and 0.0625 m² plots in the grazed sand grasslands, but found no differences at larger scales. Whilst species richness of specialists was significantly decreased, richness of weeds was increased by grazing. Decrease in the specialist species richness was likely due to the lack of their evolutionary adaptation to grazing. Degradation caused by grazing and trampling together with the propagule pressure from the neighbouring anthropo-genic habitats resulted in an increased richness of weeds in the grazed sites.","PeriodicalId":48870,"journal":{"name":"Tuexenia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuexenia","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14471/2017.37.016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Extensively managed pastures harbour rare and endangered species and have a decisive role in maintaining grassland biodiversity. Traditional herding of local robust cattle breeds is considered as a feasible tool for preserving these habitats. We studied the scale-dependent effects of grazing on the species richness and composition of three dry grassland types in the Great Hungarian Plain: Achilleo setaceae-Festucetum pseudovinae and Artemisio santonici-Festucetum pseudovinae alkaline grasslands, and Potentillo arenariae-Festucetum pseudovinae sand grassland. We asked the following questions: (1) Does extensive grazing have a scale-dependent effect on plant species richness of alkaline and sand grasslands? (2) How does grazing affect the proportion of specialists, generalists and weeds in the three grassland types? We sampled ten sites of each grassland type, including five extensively grazed and five non-grazed sites (altogether we had 30 sites). We used a series of nested plots each consisting of 10 plots from the size of 0.01 m² to 16 m². We revealed that grazing has contrasting effects in the three grassland types, and had a considerable effect on their species richness even at small scales. In both alkaline grassland types, total species richness was overall higher in grazed plots but it increased in a similar manner for both ungrazed and grazed habitats across plot sizes. Small-scale heterogeneity likely due to the uneven distribution of grazing, trampling and defecation together with mitigated rate of competition allowed more species to co-exist even at small scales in grazed alkaline grasslands. Grazing increased the richness of specialists, but likely due to the salt stress, establishment of weeds was hampered. Open gaps formed by trampling likely supported the establishment of several specialist species such as Plantago tenuiflora and Puccinellia limosa which are typical to open alkali grasslands. Contrary, in sand grasslands, we did not detect any effect of grazing on total species richness, likely due to the adverse effect of grazing on the species richness of specialists and weeds. In contrast with the former findings we detected significantly higher species richness in 0.01 m² and 0.0625 m² plots in the grazed sand grasslands, but found no differences at larger scales. Whilst species richness of specialists was significantly decreased, richness of weeds was increased by grazing. Decrease in the specialist species richness was likely due to the lack of their evolutionary adaptation to grazing. Degradation caused by grazing and trampling together with the propagule pressure from the neighbouring anthropo-genic habitats resulted in an increased richness of weeds in the grazed sites.
放牧对碱性和沙质草地物种丰富度的尺度依赖效应
粗放型牧场是珍稀濒危物种的栖息地,对维持草原生物多样性具有决定性作用。传统的当地健壮牛品种放牧被认为是保护这些栖息地的可行工具。本文研究了放牧对大匈牙利平原3种干草地类型——秋蒿-假葡萄(Achilleo setaceae-Festucetum pseudovinae)、沙蒿(Potentillo arenariae-Festucetum pseudovinae)碱性草地和沙草(Potentillo arenariae-Festucetum pseudovinae)的物种丰富度和组成的尺度依赖效应。我们提出了以下问题:(1)粗放放牧对碱性草地和沙质草地植物物种丰富度是否存在尺度依赖效应?(2)放牧对三种草地类型中专才、通才和杂草的比例有何影响?每种草地类型共10个样点,包括5个广泛放牧样点和5个非放牧样点(共30个样点)。我们使用了一系列嵌套样地,每个样地由10个样地组成,面积从0.01 m²到16 m²。结果表明,放牧对三种草地类型的影响存在差异,即使在小尺度上,放牧对其物种丰富度也有相当大的影响。在两种碱性草地类型中,放牧样地的总物种丰富度总体较高,但在不同样地大小上,未放牧和放牧生境的物种丰富度均以相似的方式增加。小规模的异质性可能是由于放牧、践踏和排便分布的不均匀,加上竞争率的降低,使得更多的物种即使在小规模的放牧碱性草地上也能共存。放牧增加了专种的丰富性,但可能由于盐胁迫,杂草的建立受到阻碍。践踏形成的开放缝隙可能支持了一些特殊物种的建立,如车前草和石灰茅,它们是开放碱草地的典型特征。相反,在沙质草地上,我们没有发现放牧对总物种丰富度的影响,这可能是由于放牧对专科植物和杂草物种丰富度的不利影响。在0.01 m²和0.0625 m²放牧样地物种丰富度显著高于放牧样地,但在更大尺度上差异不显著。放牧显著降低了专科植物的物种丰富度,增加了杂草的丰富度。特殊物种丰富度的下降可能是由于缺乏对放牧的进化适应。放牧和践踏造成的退化,加上邻近人为生境的繁殖体压力,导致放牧地杂草丰富度增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tuexenia
Tuexenia PLANT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Tuexenia publiziert Original- und Übersichtsarbeiten sowie Berichte zu Themen der Geobotanik / Vegetationsökologie und zu Nachbarwissenschaften wie Populationsökologie, Biodiversitätsforschung, Biozönologie, Renaturierungsökologie und ihren Anwendungen, vor allem im Naturschutz. Der geografische Schwerpunkt liegt in Zentraleuropa und angrenzenden Regionen.Tuexenia erscheint jährlich in einem Band, der etwa zur Jahresmitte fertig gestellt wird. Autoren erhalten von jeder Arbeit eine PDF-Datei und gemeinsam 20 Sonderdrucke kostenlos. Die Qualität der wissenschaftlichen Manuskripte wird durch die Redaktion und einen Wissenschaftlichen Beirat (Peer Review) gesichert (s. auch die Manuskript-Richtlinien vor dieser Seite). Es werden keine Druckkosten erhoben. Tuexenia legt Wert auf allgemeine Online-Verfügbarkeit der Beiträge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信