Socrates and Thrasymachus on Perfect and Imperfect Injustice

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY
Roslyn Weiss
{"title":"Socrates and Thrasymachus on Perfect and Imperfect Injustice","authors":"Roslyn Weiss","doi":"10.14195/2183-4105_22_6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is argued that the true definition of justice in Plato’s Republic appears not in Book IV but in Book I, where it is clear that justice is other-oriented or external rather than internal as per Book IV. Indeed, on Book IV’s definition, there is virtually no difference between justice and moderation. Considered here is a single argument between Socrates and Thrasymachus (351b-352d), in which Socrates contends that imperfect injustice is “stronger” than perfect. Rather than producing a just group, the justice between members of a group strengthens the injustice of a group whose external project is already unjust.","PeriodicalId":53756,"journal":{"name":"Plato Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plato Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-4105_22_6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is argued that the true definition of justice in Plato’s Republic appears not in Book IV but in Book I, where it is clear that justice is other-oriented or external rather than internal as per Book IV. Indeed, on Book IV’s definition, there is virtually no difference between justice and moderation. Considered here is a single argument between Socrates and Thrasymachus (351b-352d), in which Socrates contends that imperfect injustice is “stronger” than perfect. Rather than producing a just group, the justice between members of a group strengthens the injustice of a group whose external project is already unjust.
苏格拉底与特拉西马库斯论完美与不完美的不公正
有人认为,柏拉图《理想国》中正义的真正定义不是出现在第四卷,而是出现在第一卷,在第一卷中,很明显,正义是面向他人的或外部的,而不是像第四卷那样是内部的。事实上,在第四卷的定义中,正义和适度之间实际上没有区别。这里考虑的是苏格拉底和Thrasymachus (351b-352d)之间的一个论点,苏格拉底认为不完美的不公正比完美的更“强大”。而不是产生一个公正的群体,一个群体成员之间的正义加强了一个群体的不公正,这个群体的外部项目已经是不公正的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plato Journal
Plato Journal PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信