Insurer’s Duty to Obtain Information under the IDD Directive – Threat or Opportunity?

Olli Norros
{"title":"Insurer’s Duty to Obtain Information under the IDD Directive – Threat or Opportunity?","authors":"Olli Norros","doi":"10.12697/ji.2020.29.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Enacting Directive 2016/97, on insurance distribution (the IDD), has, inter alia, extended the scope of application of regulation, increased the requirements for expertise of the personnel of insurers and insurance intermediaries, and particularised the content of the duty to give information. One of the novelties in the IDD, with regard to the insurer’s duty to provide information, is the duty of the insurer to obtain information from the customer for enabling fulfilment of its own duty to give information. Before the IDD, the balance between the insurer’s duty to give information and the customer’s duty to become acquainted with the information received was customarily understood in many legal systems such that the insurer is obligated to supply comprehensive information on its insurance products in an understandable form while the customer bears the risk of selecting correct and sufficient insurance in reliance on the information received. In other words, the insurer is liable in respect of the information as such, but the customers accept a risk of applying the information incorrectly in their specific circumstances. This background gives rise to the following questions, examined in the article: 1) What is the legislative background of the new duty to obtain information, and what are the objectives behind it? 2) What are the consequences of neglecting this duty? 3) What is the ‘upside risk’ of the reform? That is, in what kinds of cases could the new duty improve matters? 4) What is the ‘downside risk’? In other words, might the new duty cause any problems? The article provides analysis focused on the IDD itself rather than on any national jurisdiction in which the directive has been implemented.","PeriodicalId":55758,"journal":{"name":"Juridica International","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridica International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12697/ji.2020.29.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Enacting Directive 2016/97, on insurance distribution (the IDD), has, inter alia, extended the scope of application of regulation, increased the requirements for expertise of the personnel of insurers and insurance intermediaries, and particularised the content of the duty to give information. One of the novelties in the IDD, with regard to the insurer’s duty to provide information, is the duty of the insurer to obtain information from the customer for enabling fulfilment of its own duty to give information. Before the IDD, the balance between the insurer’s duty to give information and the customer’s duty to become acquainted with the information received was customarily understood in many legal systems such that the insurer is obligated to supply comprehensive information on its insurance products in an understandable form while the customer bears the risk of selecting correct and sufficient insurance in reliance on the information received. In other words, the insurer is liable in respect of the information as such, but the customers accept a risk of applying the information incorrectly in their specific circumstances. This background gives rise to the following questions, examined in the article: 1) What is the legislative background of the new duty to obtain information, and what are the objectives behind it? 2) What are the consequences of neglecting this duty? 3) What is the ‘upside risk’ of the reform? That is, in what kinds of cases could the new duty improve matters? 4) What is the ‘downside risk’? In other words, might the new duty cause any problems? The article provides analysis focused on the IDD itself rather than on any national jurisdiction in which the directive has been implemented.
保险公司根据IDD指令获取信息的责任——威胁还是机遇?
关于保险分销(IDD)的2016/97号指令的颁布,除其他外,扩大了监管的适用范围,增加了对保险公司和保险中介人员的专业知识的要求,并具体规定了提供信息的责任内容。关于保险公司提供信息的义务,IDD的一个新颖之处是,保险公司有义务从客户处获取信息,以便履行其提供信息的义务。在IDD之前,在许多法律制度中,保险人提供信息的义务和客户了解所收到信息的义务之间的平衡通常是被理解的,即保险人有义务以可理解的形式提供有关其保险产品的全面信息,而客户则承担依赖所收到的信息选择正确和充分保险的风险。换句话说,保险公司对信息本身负有责任,但客户接受在其特定情况下错误应用信息的风险。这一背景产生了以下问题,本文对此进行了研究:1)获取信息的新义务的立法背景是什么,其背后的目标是什么?忽视这一责任的后果是什么?3)改革的“上行风险”是什么?也就是说,在什么样的情况下,新税能改善情况?4)什么是“下行风险”?换句话说,新关税是否会带来任何问题?本文提供的分析侧重于IDD本身,而不是针对执行该指令的任何国家司法管辖区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信