{"title":"August Matthias Hagen (1794–1878) – Deutschbaltische Landschaftsmalerei zwischen romantischem Aufbruch und provinzieller Selbstgenügsamkeit","authors":"G. Vogel","doi":"10.12697/BJAH.2015.10.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"August Matthias Hagen (1794–1878) – Baltic German Landscape Painting Between Romantic Beginnings and Provincial Self-Sufficiency The art of August Matthias Hagen (1794–1878), once a drawing instructor at Tartu University, was previously almost unknown beyond the borders of Estonia. Awareness of his works came about thanks to the exhibitions in Hamburg (2006) and in Amsterdam (2008), which also brought with them an opportunity for a new assessment of his art. It became evident from the drawings and paintings shown in these galleries that the work he created in the mid 1830’s – depicting landscape views of Southern Finland – reveal a great affinity with the aesthetics and spirit of Dresden Romanticism from the circle of Caspar David Friedrich. This essay not only focuses on the debt Hagen’s mature work owes to painters like C. D. Friedrich, Carl Gustav Carus, and Johan Christian Clausen Dahl, but it also intends to show how the Romantic spirit of such Dresden artists from the early 19th century came, at least for a certain period of time, to influence A. M. Hagen’s art. Without a doubt, Wassilij Andrewitsch Shukowski – a poet, the Russian Zarewich’s personal tutor, and Hagen’s fellow student at the Drawing School of Tartu University – was the primary connection between A. M. Hagen and Dresden’s art milieu. Hagen not only became acquainted with individual works done by Friedrich via Shukowski, but also through the painting collection of Tartu Professor Johann Christian Moyer and from the theoretical fundaments of the Romantic Erdlebenbild – a concept included in Carl Gustav Carusʼ treatise: Ten Letters about Landscape Painting , (second edition 1835). The drawings and paintings commissioned by the Czar reflect Hagen’s intense studies of Carusʼ theory of Romantic landscape painting, particularly in those works showing views of Finland – like the island of Hogland, territory which had been recently acquired by the Russian Empire. Yet A. M. Hagen soon left behind these Romantic, philosophical ideals involving yearning and redemption. He replaced them with a concept associated with a poetic view of reality clearly embodying J. C. C. Dahl’s Romantic Realism. Thus, Hagen’s art gradually evolved into a quite painstaking, topographically exact rendering of landscapes (vedute) adapted from Dahl’s conception of Romantic Realism. But unlike Dahl’s poetic vision, Hagen practised a more sober realism fully within the Biedermeier spirit. In this way Hagen changed his orientation from Romantic landscape painting conveying mood and meaning towards an idyllic Biedermeier landscape containing an atmosphere of essentially “idealized reality”. This article dealing with the artistic production of the Baltic-German landscape painter August Matthias Hagen includes two aspects of his career: a look back into his early work dating from before his confrontation with Dresden Romantic landscape painting and an overview of his later period – occurring after his return from a study trip to Germany, Austria, and Switzerland – a time when he was then more sensitized to newer tendencies in Romantic art. However, in Tartu, Hagen was essentially responsible for fulfilling the university’s curriculum requirements expected from its drawing master: to primarily convey a solid sense of draftsmanship and nurture a sober talent for observation. In addition, because Hagen was isolated from his previous German sources – due to the geographically remote location in the Russian Baltic province – his late landscape paintings lacked a true spiritual profundity. This provincial seclusion from German and Russian art centers caused Hagen’s later work to be characterized by a tendency to unspectacular self-sufficiency which made no real effort to maintain connections with newer developments in the more modern, avant-garde trends that subsequently occurred in European art.","PeriodicalId":52089,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Journal of Art History","volume":"10 1","pages":"11-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Journal of Art History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12697/BJAH.2015.10.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
August Matthias Hagen (1794–1878) – Baltic German Landscape Painting Between Romantic Beginnings and Provincial Self-Sufficiency The art of August Matthias Hagen (1794–1878), once a drawing instructor at Tartu University, was previously almost unknown beyond the borders of Estonia. Awareness of his works came about thanks to the exhibitions in Hamburg (2006) and in Amsterdam (2008), which also brought with them an opportunity for a new assessment of his art. It became evident from the drawings and paintings shown in these galleries that the work he created in the mid 1830’s – depicting landscape views of Southern Finland – reveal a great affinity with the aesthetics and spirit of Dresden Romanticism from the circle of Caspar David Friedrich. This essay not only focuses on the debt Hagen’s mature work owes to painters like C. D. Friedrich, Carl Gustav Carus, and Johan Christian Clausen Dahl, but it also intends to show how the Romantic spirit of such Dresden artists from the early 19th century came, at least for a certain period of time, to influence A. M. Hagen’s art. Without a doubt, Wassilij Andrewitsch Shukowski – a poet, the Russian Zarewich’s personal tutor, and Hagen’s fellow student at the Drawing School of Tartu University – was the primary connection between A. M. Hagen and Dresden’s art milieu. Hagen not only became acquainted with individual works done by Friedrich via Shukowski, but also through the painting collection of Tartu Professor Johann Christian Moyer and from the theoretical fundaments of the Romantic Erdlebenbild – a concept included in Carl Gustav Carusʼ treatise: Ten Letters about Landscape Painting , (second edition 1835). The drawings and paintings commissioned by the Czar reflect Hagen’s intense studies of Carusʼ theory of Romantic landscape painting, particularly in those works showing views of Finland – like the island of Hogland, territory which had been recently acquired by the Russian Empire. Yet A. M. Hagen soon left behind these Romantic, philosophical ideals involving yearning and redemption. He replaced them with a concept associated with a poetic view of reality clearly embodying J. C. C. Dahl’s Romantic Realism. Thus, Hagen’s art gradually evolved into a quite painstaking, topographically exact rendering of landscapes (vedute) adapted from Dahl’s conception of Romantic Realism. But unlike Dahl’s poetic vision, Hagen practised a more sober realism fully within the Biedermeier spirit. In this way Hagen changed his orientation from Romantic landscape painting conveying mood and meaning towards an idyllic Biedermeier landscape containing an atmosphere of essentially “idealized reality”. This article dealing with the artistic production of the Baltic-German landscape painter August Matthias Hagen includes two aspects of his career: a look back into his early work dating from before his confrontation with Dresden Romantic landscape painting and an overview of his later period – occurring after his return from a study trip to Germany, Austria, and Switzerland – a time when he was then more sensitized to newer tendencies in Romantic art. However, in Tartu, Hagen was essentially responsible for fulfilling the university’s curriculum requirements expected from its drawing master: to primarily convey a solid sense of draftsmanship and nurture a sober talent for observation. In addition, because Hagen was isolated from his previous German sources – due to the geographically remote location in the Russian Baltic province – his late landscape paintings lacked a true spiritual profundity. This provincial seclusion from German and Russian art centers caused Hagen’s later work to be characterized by a tendency to unspectacular self-sufficiency which made no real effort to maintain connections with newer developments in the more modern, avant-garde trends that subsequently occurred in European art.
奥古斯特·马蒂亚斯·哈根(August Matthias Hagen, 1794-1878)曾经是塔尔图大学的一名绘画教师,他的艺术在爱沙尼亚之外几乎不为人知。在汉堡(2006年)和阿姆斯特丹(2008年)的展览中,他的作品得到了人们的关注,这也给他们带来了对他的艺术进行新评估的机会。从这些画廊里展示的素描和油画中可以明显看出,他在19世纪30年代中期创作的作品——描绘了芬兰南部的风景——与卡斯帕·大卫·弗里德里希(Caspar David Friedrich)圈子里的德累斯顿浪漫主义的美学和精神有很大的亲和力。这篇文章不仅关注哈根的成熟作品欠像C. D.弗里德里希,卡尔·古斯塔夫·卡鲁斯和约翰·克里斯蒂安·克劳森·达尔这样的画家的债,而且还打算展示19世纪早期德累斯顿艺术家的浪漫主义精神是如何来的,至少在一段时间内,影响了a . M.哈根的艺术。毫无疑问,诗人Wassilij Andrewitsch Shukowski是a . M. Hagen和德累斯顿艺术环境之间的主要联系,他是俄罗斯Zarewich的私人导师,也是Hagen在塔尔图大学绘画学院的同学。哈根不仅通过Shukowski熟悉了弗里德里希的个人作品,而且还通过塔尔图教授Johann Christian Moyer的绘画收藏和浪漫主义Erdlebenbild的理论基础-这一概念包括在Carl Gustav Carus的论文中:关于风景画的十封信,(1835年第二版)。这些受沙皇委托的绘画作品反映了哈根对卡鲁斯的浪漫主义风景画理论的深入研究,尤其是那些展示芬兰景色的作品,比如不久前被俄罗斯帝国收购的霍格兰岛。然而,a·m·黑根很快就把这些浪漫的、哲学的、涉及渴望和救赎的理想抛在了身后。他用一种与现实的诗意观点相关联的概念取代了它们,这明显体现了j·c·c·达尔的浪漫现实主义。因此,哈根的艺术逐渐演变成一种相当艰苦的、地形精确的景观渲染(vedute),改编自达尔的浪漫现实主义概念。但与达尔的诗意愿景不同,哈根在比德迈尔的精神中实践了一种更清醒的现实主义。通过这种方式,哈根将自己的创作方向从传达情绪和意义的浪漫主义山水画转向了比德梅尔式的田园诗般的风景画,其中包含了一种本质上“理想化的现实”的氛围。这篇文章涉及波罗的海-德国风景画家奥古斯特·马蒂亚斯·哈根的艺术创作,包括他职业生涯的两个方面:回顾他与德累斯顿浪漫主义风景画对峙之前的早期作品,以及概述他的后期——发生在他从德国、奥地利和瑞士学习旅行回来之后——当时他对浪漫主义艺术的新趋势更加敏感。然而,在塔尔图,黑根主要负责完成大学对绘画大师的课程要求:主要是传达一种扎实的绘图技术,培养一种冷静的观察才能。此外,由于哈根在俄罗斯波罗的海省的地理位置偏远,他与以前的德国来源隔绝,他的晚期山水画缺乏真正的精神深度。这种远离德国和俄罗斯艺术中心的隐居生活使哈根后来的作品呈现出一种不引人注目的自给自足的倾向,这种倾向没有真正的努力去保持与后来在欧洲艺术中出现的更现代、更前卫的新发展的联系。
期刊介绍:
THE BALTIC JOURNAL OF ART HISTORY is an official publication of the Department of Art History of the Institute of History and Archaeology of the University of Tartu. It is published by the University of Tartu Press in cooperation with the Department of Art History. The concept of the journal is to ask contributions from different authors whose ideas and research findings in terms of their content and high academic quality invite them to be published. We are mainly looking forward to lengthy articles of monographic character as well as shorter pieces where the issues raised or the new facts presented cover topics that have not yet been shed light on or open up new art geographies.