Kristiina Tiideberg, Hilkka Hiiop, T. Vint, Kristina Aas, Grete Nilp, Kaisa-Piia Pedajas, Helen Volber
{"title":"Results of the Reasearch Conducted in 2014 on the Interior Finishing of the Rotunda in the University of Tartu's Old Anatomical Theatre","authors":"Kristiina Tiideberg, Hilkka Hiiop, T. Vint, Kristina Aas, Grete Nilp, Kaisa-Piia Pedajas, Helen Volber","doi":"10.12697/BJAH.2015.10.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main objective of the research was to determine if the neoclassical grisaille paintings by K. A. Senff in the rotunda of the Old Anatomical Theatre still existed and to what extent. At the same time, a study of the historical furniture was also conducted. As a result it can be confirmed that the paintings on the walls or ceilings have not survived and the assumption that they were covered with lime plaster at some point in time has been disproved. The greater part of the room is covered with secondary plaster, which is confirmed by the polychromic plaster fragment that was finished earlier and found in the upper part of the wall, partially covered by the current coved ceiling. The previous research also assumed that the current plaster coat was secondary. And the fact that the current ceiling with the mirrored vault is secondary was also confirmed. Based on the original plaster fragment that was found, it can be assumed that the original finishing did not include the niches in the upper part of the walls, where it has been assumed that the paintings were located. Unfortunately, it is no longer possible to ascertain where the paintings were located and how they were executed. Whether the rotunda’s interior was initially finished in a dark, almost black, shade, or was this true only of the upper part of the room; how the paintings in grey tones related to this and how extensive they were unfortunately remain a secret hidden in the obscurity of history. Questions are also raised by the fact that Krause’s notes are the only primary sources to provide information about the paintings. One would expect to find other indications of such large-scale and exceptional work (Senff is not known to have created any other monumental paintings) in the archival materials (for instance, in Senff’s own materials). It is still unclear why the initial plaster coat was totally removed and a new coat applied, especially if we consider that it was covered with paintings. Although these large-scale renovations can be associated with the period between 1856 and 1860 (architect K. Rathaus), when the rotunda’s interior was rebuilt and the entire anatomical theatre was expanded, questions are raised by the fact that the current secondary plaster coat has an unexpectedly small number of finishing coats for such long period of time. Since, the only surviving plaster fragment that presumably dates back to the Krause era is an extremely valuable historical document and forms the basis for future research, it should be exhibited in the room when the interior renovation is completed. As a result of the research conducted on the finishing coats of the historical furniture, it turned out that the oldest piece of furniture in the current interior is probably the rostrum. However whether or not it dates back to the time when the rotunda was built is still an open question. In the future, its original polychromy should be revealed and exhibited when the planned interior finishing is completed. Based on the current research, the benches, demonstration table and central section of the wall cabinet can be associated with the reconstruction of the anatomical theatre in the second half of the 1850s. The benches and rostrum have been altered thereafter as needed. The floor is the only surviving part of the rotunda’s interior finishing that can definitely be dated back to the Krause era and it should be preserved during the renovation and thereafter exhibited","PeriodicalId":52089,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Journal of Art History","volume":"10 1","pages":"105-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Journal of Art History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12697/BJAH.2015.10.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The main objective of the research was to determine if the neoclassical grisaille paintings by K. A. Senff in the rotunda of the Old Anatomical Theatre still existed and to what extent. At the same time, a study of the historical furniture was also conducted. As a result it can be confirmed that the paintings on the walls or ceilings have not survived and the assumption that they were covered with lime plaster at some point in time has been disproved. The greater part of the room is covered with secondary plaster, which is confirmed by the polychromic plaster fragment that was finished earlier and found in the upper part of the wall, partially covered by the current coved ceiling. The previous research also assumed that the current plaster coat was secondary. And the fact that the current ceiling with the mirrored vault is secondary was also confirmed. Based on the original plaster fragment that was found, it can be assumed that the original finishing did not include the niches in the upper part of the walls, where it has been assumed that the paintings were located. Unfortunately, it is no longer possible to ascertain where the paintings were located and how they were executed. Whether the rotunda’s interior was initially finished in a dark, almost black, shade, or was this true only of the upper part of the room; how the paintings in grey tones related to this and how extensive they were unfortunately remain a secret hidden in the obscurity of history. Questions are also raised by the fact that Krause’s notes are the only primary sources to provide information about the paintings. One would expect to find other indications of such large-scale and exceptional work (Senff is not known to have created any other monumental paintings) in the archival materials (for instance, in Senff’s own materials). It is still unclear why the initial plaster coat was totally removed and a new coat applied, especially if we consider that it was covered with paintings. Although these large-scale renovations can be associated with the period between 1856 and 1860 (architect K. Rathaus), when the rotunda’s interior was rebuilt and the entire anatomical theatre was expanded, questions are raised by the fact that the current secondary plaster coat has an unexpectedly small number of finishing coats for such long period of time. Since, the only surviving plaster fragment that presumably dates back to the Krause era is an extremely valuable historical document and forms the basis for future research, it should be exhibited in the room when the interior renovation is completed. As a result of the research conducted on the finishing coats of the historical furniture, it turned out that the oldest piece of furniture in the current interior is probably the rostrum. However whether or not it dates back to the time when the rotunda was built is still an open question. In the future, its original polychromy should be revealed and exhibited when the planned interior finishing is completed. Based on the current research, the benches, demonstration table and central section of the wall cabinet can be associated with the reconstruction of the anatomical theatre in the second half of the 1850s. The benches and rostrum have been altered thereafter as needed. The floor is the only surviving part of the rotunda’s interior finishing that can definitely be dated back to the Krause era and it should be preserved during the renovation and thereafter exhibited
研究的主要目的是确定在旧解剖剧院的圆形大厅里由K. A. Senff创作的新古典绘画是否仍然存在,以及存在的程度。同时,对历史家具也进行了研究。因此,可以确认墙壁或天花板上的画作没有幸存下来,并且在某个时间点上覆盖石灰灰泥的假设已经被推翻。房间的大部分都覆盖着二次灰泥,这一点得到了早期完成的多色灰泥碎片的证实,这些碎片在墙壁的上部发现,部分被目前的圆顶天花板覆盖。先前的研究也假设现在的灰泥涂层是次要的。而目前带有镜像拱顶的天花板是次要的这一事实也得到了证实。根据发现的原始石膏碎片,可以假设原始的装修不包括墙壁上部的壁龛,而这些壁龛被认为是画作的所在地。不幸的是,已经不可能确定这些画的位置以及它们是如何被制作的。圆形大厅的内部最初是在黑暗中完成的,几乎是黑色的,阴影,还是只有房间的上部是这样;不幸的是,这些灰色调的画作是如何与此相关的,以及它们的范围有多广,仍然是隐藏在历史迷雾中的一个秘密。克劳斯的笔记是提供这些画作信息的唯一主要来源,这一事实也引起了人们的质疑。人们会期望在档案材料中(例如,在塞夫自己的材料中)找到这种大规模和特殊作品的其他迹象(据了解,塞夫没有创作过任何其他纪念性绘画)。目前还不清楚为什么最初的石膏涂层被完全去除,并重新涂上一层,特别是如果我们考虑到它被绘画覆盖。尽管这些大规模的翻新可以与1856年至1860年之间的时期联系起来(建筑师K. Rathaus),当圆形大厅的内部重建和整个解剖剧院扩建时,目前的二次石膏涂层在这么长的时间里出人意料地只有很少的面漆,这一事实提出了疑问。由于唯一幸存的石膏碎片可能可以追溯到克劳斯时代,这是一份非常有价值的历史文件,是未来研究的基础,因此在室内装修完成后,它应该在房间里展出。对历史家具的表面涂层进行了研究,结果发现,目前室内最古老的家具可能是讲坛。然而,它是否可以追溯到圆形大厅建造的时代仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。在未来,当规划的室内装修完成时,其原始的多色应该被揭示和展示。根据目前的研究,壁柜的长凳、演示桌和中央部分可以与19世纪50年代下半叶解剖剧院的重建联系起来。长凳和讲坛后来根据需要作了改动。地板是圆形大厅内部装饰中唯一幸存的部分,可以肯定地追溯到克劳斯时代,它应该在装修期间被保存下来,并在之后展出
期刊介绍:
THE BALTIC JOURNAL OF ART HISTORY is an official publication of the Department of Art History of the Institute of History and Archaeology of the University of Tartu. It is published by the University of Tartu Press in cooperation with the Department of Art History. The concept of the journal is to ask contributions from different authors whose ideas and research findings in terms of their content and high academic quality invite them to be published. We are mainly looking forward to lengthy articles of monographic character as well as shorter pieces where the issues raised or the new facts presented cover topics that have not yet been shed light on or open up new art geographies.