Comparative Advantage in Smith's "Wealth of Nations" and Ricardo's "Principles": a Brief History of its Early Development

Q2 Arts and Humanities
F. Rassekh
{"title":"Comparative Advantage in Smith's \"Wealth of Nations\" and Ricardo's \"Principles\": a Brief History of its Early Development","authors":"F. Rassekh","doi":"10.1400/232248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present paper delves into the writings of three thinkers on the theory of comparative advantage: Henry Martyn, Adam Smith, and David Ricardo. Martyn’s writings, by introducing what later was called «the eighteenth-century rule», prepared the path of transition from absolute advantage to comparative advantage as the basis of trade. Smith provided a description of comparative advantage outcome by observing that a poor country can rival a rich country in agricultural goods despite having an absolute disadvantage in both manufacturing and agricultural goods. The present paper focuses particularly on Smith because he has not received the attention he deserves in the literature on comparative advantage. In this intellectual odyssey, Ricardo plays the seminal role with his famous example of England exchanging cloth for Portuguese wine.","PeriodicalId":38602,"journal":{"name":"History of Economic Ideas","volume":"23 1","pages":"59-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Economic Ideas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1400/232248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The present paper delves into the writings of three thinkers on the theory of comparative advantage: Henry Martyn, Adam Smith, and David Ricardo. Martyn’s writings, by introducing what later was called «the eighteenth-century rule», prepared the path of transition from absolute advantage to comparative advantage as the basis of trade. Smith provided a description of comparative advantage outcome by observing that a poor country can rival a rich country in agricultural goods despite having an absolute disadvantage in both manufacturing and agricultural goods. The present paper focuses particularly on Smith because he has not received the attention he deserves in the literature on comparative advantage. In this intellectual odyssey, Ricardo plays the seminal role with his famous example of England exchanging cloth for Portuguese wine.
斯密《国富论》和李嘉图《原理》中的比较优势:早期发展简史
本文探讨了三位思想家关于比较优势理论的著作:亨利·马丁、亚当·斯密和大卫·李嘉图。马丁的著作通过引入后来被称为“十八世纪规则”的东西,为从绝对优势向比较优势过渡作为贸易基础的道路做好了准备。斯密对比较优势结果进行了描述,他观察到一个穷国尽管在制造业和农产品方面都处于绝对劣势,但仍可以在农产品方面与富国竞争。本文特别关注斯密,因为他在比较优势的文献中没有得到应有的关注。李嘉图在这段智力之旅中发挥了开创性的作用,他举出了著名的英国人用布料换葡萄牙葡萄酒的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
History of Economic Ideas
History of Economic Ideas Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: History of Economic Ideas is a new international series of Quaderni di storia dell''economia politica, a journal founded in 1983 to promote collaboration between scholars who share an historical approach to the major issues, the various "revolutions" which have left their mark on economics and the spread of economic ideas beyond the narrow circle of specialists. History of Economic Ideas rejects the dichotomy between "analysis" and "culture": both aspects are of equal importance for a wider understanding of the subject. In a period such as our own, where paradigms which once seemed unshakeable are now being challenged, a multidisciplinary analysis of the historical development of economics might contribute to shedding light on the issues at the root of current debate. Besides essays and critical surveys, the journal includes archive material and reviews of new books on history of economics. History of Economic Ideas is double-blind peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信