{"title":"Keynes, the Great Depression, and international economic relations.","authors":"A. Carabelli, M. Cedrini","doi":"10.1400/230183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two diametrically opposed positions have developed in the literature as regards the impact of the Great Depression on Keynes’s economics: while ‘externalists’ consider the Great Depression as the determining cause of Keynes’s revolution, other subscribe to an ‘internalist’ view of the development of Keynes’s thinking from the 'Treatise on Money' to the 'General Theory'. The article suggests a third possibility, namely that Keynes’s ‘method’, and methodological continuity throughout his writings, allow the possibility to adapt theories to changing times and circumstances, that is, to different quaesita. It thereby emphasizes that, though elaborated having in mind the theoretical framework of the 'Treatise on Money', Keynes’s early articles on the Great Depression tell much about the future as well as the past of his theoretical journey. In particular, the article illustrates two ‘big pictures’ providing the background for the Keynes’s evolving thoughts on the main issues of capitalism. The criticality of investment decisions under conditions of irreducible uncertainty, and the ineliminable tensions between creditors and debtors, also at the international level, endangering national autonomy and policy space, are here discussed as two main constants in the evolution of Keynes’s thinking, providing insights that might be relevant to interpret the current recession.","PeriodicalId":38602,"journal":{"name":"History of Economic Ideas","volume":"22 1","pages":"105-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Economic Ideas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1400/230183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
Two diametrically opposed positions have developed in the literature as regards the impact of the Great Depression on Keynes’s economics: while ‘externalists’ consider the Great Depression as the determining cause of Keynes’s revolution, other subscribe to an ‘internalist’ view of the development of Keynes’s thinking from the 'Treatise on Money' to the 'General Theory'. The article suggests a third possibility, namely that Keynes’s ‘method’, and methodological continuity throughout his writings, allow the possibility to adapt theories to changing times and circumstances, that is, to different quaesita. It thereby emphasizes that, though elaborated having in mind the theoretical framework of the 'Treatise on Money', Keynes’s early articles on the Great Depression tell much about the future as well as the past of his theoretical journey. In particular, the article illustrates two ‘big pictures’ providing the background for the Keynes’s evolving thoughts on the main issues of capitalism. The criticality of investment decisions under conditions of irreducible uncertainty, and the ineliminable tensions between creditors and debtors, also at the international level, endangering national autonomy and policy space, are here discussed as two main constants in the evolution of Keynes’s thinking, providing insights that might be relevant to interpret the current recession.
期刊介绍:
History of Economic Ideas is a new international series of Quaderni di storia dell''economia politica, a journal founded in 1983 to promote collaboration between scholars who share an historical approach to the major issues, the various "revolutions" which have left their mark on economics and the spread of economic ideas beyond the narrow circle of specialists. History of Economic Ideas rejects the dichotomy between "analysis" and "culture": both aspects are of equal importance for a wider understanding of the subject. In a period such as our own, where paradigms which once seemed unshakeable are now being challenged, a multidisciplinary analysis of the historical development of economics might contribute to shedding light on the issues at the root of current debate. Besides essays and critical surveys, the journal includes archive material and reviews of new books on history of economics. History of Economic Ideas is double-blind peer reviewed.