Keynes, the Great Depression, and international economic relations.

Q2 Arts and Humanities
A. Carabelli, M. Cedrini
{"title":"Keynes, the Great Depression, and international economic relations.","authors":"A. Carabelli, M. Cedrini","doi":"10.1400/230183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two diametrically opposed positions have developed in the literature as regards the impact of the Great Depression on Keynes’s economics: while ‘externalists’ consider the Great Depression as the determining cause of Keynes’s revolution, other subscribe to an ‘internalist’ view of the development of Keynes’s thinking from the 'Treatise on Money' to the 'General Theory'. The article suggests a third possibility, namely that Keynes’s ‘method’, and methodological continuity throughout his writings, allow the possibility to adapt theories to changing times and circumstances, that is, to different quaesita. It thereby emphasizes that, though elaborated having in mind the theoretical framework of the 'Treatise on Money', Keynes’s early articles on the Great Depression tell much about the future as well as the past of his theoretical journey. In particular, the article illustrates two ‘big pictures’ providing the background for the Keynes’s evolving thoughts on the main issues of capitalism. The criticality of investment decisions under conditions of irreducible uncertainty, and the ineliminable tensions between creditors and debtors, also at the international level, endangering national autonomy and policy space, are here discussed as two main constants in the evolution of Keynes’s thinking, providing insights that might be relevant to interpret the current recession.","PeriodicalId":38602,"journal":{"name":"History of Economic Ideas","volume":"22 1","pages":"105-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Economic Ideas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1400/230183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Two diametrically opposed positions have developed in the literature as regards the impact of the Great Depression on Keynes’s economics: while ‘externalists’ consider the Great Depression as the determining cause of Keynes’s revolution, other subscribe to an ‘internalist’ view of the development of Keynes’s thinking from the 'Treatise on Money' to the 'General Theory'. The article suggests a third possibility, namely that Keynes’s ‘method’, and methodological continuity throughout his writings, allow the possibility to adapt theories to changing times and circumstances, that is, to different quaesita. It thereby emphasizes that, though elaborated having in mind the theoretical framework of the 'Treatise on Money', Keynes’s early articles on the Great Depression tell much about the future as well as the past of his theoretical journey. In particular, the article illustrates two ‘big pictures’ providing the background for the Keynes’s evolving thoughts on the main issues of capitalism. The criticality of investment decisions under conditions of irreducible uncertainty, and the ineliminable tensions between creditors and debtors, also at the international level, endangering national autonomy and policy space, are here discussed as two main constants in the evolution of Keynes’s thinking, providing insights that might be relevant to interpret the current recession.
凯恩斯,大萧条,以及国际经济关系。
关于大萧条对凯恩斯经济学的影响,文献中出现了两种截然相反的观点:“外部主义者”认为大萧条是凯恩斯革命的决定性原因,而另一些人则赞同“内部主义者”的观点,认为凯恩斯的思想从《货币论》到《通论》的发展。这篇文章提出了第三种可能性,即凯恩斯的“方法”,以及贯穿其著作的方法论连续性,使得理论有可能适应不断变化的时代和环境,也就是说,适应不同的准定性。因此,它强调,尽管凯恩斯在“货币论”的理论框架中进行了详细阐述,但他关于大萧条的早期文章讲述了他的理论旅程的未来和过去。特别是,这篇文章阐述了两幅“大图景”,为凯恩斯在资本主义主要问题上不断发展的思想提供了背景。在不可减少的不确定性条件下,投资决策的重要性,以及债权人和债务人之间不可消除的紧张关系,也在国际层面上,危及国家自治和政策空间,在这里作为凯恩斯思想演变中的两个主要常量进行讨论,提供可能与解释当前衰退相关的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
History of Economic Ideas
History of Economic Ideas Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: History of Economic Ideas is a new international series of Quaderni di storia dell''economia politica, a journal founded in 1983 to promote collaboration between scholars who share an historical approach to the major issues, the various "revolutions" which have left their mark on economics and the spread of economic ideas beyond the narrow circle of specialists. History of Economic Ideas rejects the dichotomy between "analysis" and "culture": both aspects are of equal importance for a wider understanding of the subject. In a period such as our own, where paradigms which once seemed unshakeable are now being challenged, a multidisciplinary analysis of the historical development of economics might contribute to shedding light on the issues at the root of current debate. Besides essays and critical surveys, the journal includes archive material and reviews of new books on history of economics. History of Economic Ideas is double-blind peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信