Public Satisfaction With Police: The Importance of Procedural Justice and Police Performance in Police-Citizen Encounters

IF 2.7 Q1 Social Sciences
Murphy Kristina
{"title":"Public Satisfaction With Police: The Importance of Procedural Justice and Police Performance in Police-Citizen Encounters","authors":"Murphy Kristina","doi":"10.1375/acri.42.2.159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Alarge body of literature has demonstrated that when authorities use procedural justice with those they regulate, people will be more satisfied with those authorities and will be more willing to cooperate and comply with their directions and rules. In the context of policing, procedural justice has also been shown to be important for shaping citizens' views about police legitimacy, their satisfaction with police and also in fostering cooperation with police. What remains largely unexamined, however, is whether the positive effect of procedural justice varies across different types of police-citizen encounters. Using survey data collected from a national sample of 1,462 Australians, the present study will examine the relative importance of procedural justice on overall ratings of police satisfaction across two types of police-citizen encounters (citizen-initiated contacts and police-initiated contacts). It will be shown that procedural justice is most important in police-initiated contacts, while police performance is most important in citizen-initiated contacts.","PeriodicalId":47198,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology","volume":"42 1","pages":"159 - 178"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1375/acri.42.2.159","citationCount":"171","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1375/acri.42.2.159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 171

Abstract

Abstract Alarge body of literature has demonstrated that when authorities use procedural justice with those they regulate, people will be more satisfied with those authorities and will be more willing to cooperate and comply with their directions and rules. In the context of policing, procedural justice has also been shown to be important for shaping citizens' views about police legitimacy, their satisfaction with police and also in fostering cooperation with police. What remains largely unexamined, however, is whether the positive effect of procedural justice varies across different types of police-citizen encounters. Using survey data collected from a national sample of 1,462 Australians, the present study will examine the relative importance of procedural justice on overall ratings of police satisfaction across two types of police-citizen encounters (citizen-initiated contacts and police-initiated contacts). It will be shown that procedural justice is most important in police-initiated contacts, while police performance is most important in citizen-initiated contacts.
公众对警察的满意度:警察与公民接触中程序正义和警察表现的重要性
大量文献表明,当当局对他们所监管的对象使用程序正义时,人们会对当局更满意,更愿意合作和遵守他们的指示和规则。在警务方面,程序正义也被证明对塑造公民对警察合法性的看法、他们对警察的满意度以及促进与警察的合作很重要。然而,程序正义的积极影响是否在不同类型的警察与公民接触中有所不同,这在很大程度上仍未得到检验。利用从1462名澳大利亚人的全国样本中收集的调查数据,本研究将检验两种类型的警察-公民接触(公民发起的接触和警察发起的接触)中程序正义对警察满意度总体评级的相对重要性。研究表明,程序正义在警察发起的接触中最为重要,而警察绩效在公民发起的接触中最为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: For over 30 years, the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology has been presenting a professional eclectic approach to the tertiary field of criminology by promoting quality research and debate on crime and criminal justice. Features of the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology include: - peer review of all articles - a diversity of theoretical and methodological articles - current ethical and ideological debates - special topic features. Disciplines covered include: - psychology - law - politics - history - sociology - forensic sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信