{"title":"The Critical Steps in the Transition from the Treatise to the General Theory : An Alternative Interpretation Motivated by the Work of Toshiaki Hirai","authors":"Geoff Tily","doi":"10.1400/140330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Paper takes Toshiaki Hirai’s (2007) Keynes’s Theoretical Development: From the Tract to the General Theory as motivation for a re-evaluation of the transition between the Treatise and General Theory. Hirai’s work is important because he frees the transition from the ‘Keynesian’ interpretation, under which Keynes is thought to discover the rationale for fiscal policy and move to ‘output adjustment’ from ‘price adjustment’. I go further and argue that previous interpretations have greatly misunderstood the nature of the General Theory. Keynes was primarily concerned with the cause of economic malfunction, and monetary measures for its prevention. The processes central to both the Treatise and the General Theory concerned interest, investment and saving. The transition concerned the abandoning of the classical and long-run equilibrium relationship that underpinned the Treatise and the move to the «psychological propensities» – the marginal propensity to consume, the marginal efficiency of capital and the schedule of liquidity preference – that were foundation to the General Theory. The steps that led to this discovery are detailed and the importance of the contributions of Keynes’s colleagues are re-evaluated in the light of the reduced emphasis on fiscal considerations.","PeriodicalId":38602,"journal":{"name":"History of Economic Ideas","volume":"18 1","pages":"61-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Economic Ideas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1400/140330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Paper takes Toshiaki Hirai’s (2007) Keynes’s Theoretical Development: From the Tract to the General Theory as motivation for a re-evaluation of the transition between the Treatise and General Theory. Hirai’s work is important because he frees the transition from the ‘Keynesian’ interpretation, under which Keynes is thought to discover the rationale for fiscal policy and move to ‘output adjustment’ from ‘price adjustment’. I go further and argue that previous interpretations have greatly misunderstood the nature of the General Theory. Keynes was primarily concerned with the cause of economic malfunction, and monetary measures for its prevention. The processes central to both the Treatise and the General Theory concerned interest, investment and saving. The transition concerned the abandoning of the classical and long-run equilibrium relationship that underpinned the Treatise and the move to the «psychological propensities» – the marginal propensity to consume, the marginal efficiency of capital and the schedule of liquidity preference – that were foundation to the General Theory. The steps that led to this discovery are detailed and the importance of the contributions of Keynes’s colleagues are re-evaluated in the light of the reduced emphasis on fiscal considerations.
期刊介绍:
History of Economic Ideas is a new international series of Quaderni di storia dell''economia politica, a journal founded in 1983 to promote collaboration between scholars who share an historical approach to the major issues, the various "revolutions" which have left their mark on economics and the spread of economic ideas beyond the narrow circle of specialists. History of Economic Ideas rejects the dichotomy between "analysis" and "culture": both aspects are of equal importance for a wider understanding of the subject. In a period such as our own, where paradigms which once seemed unshakeable are now being challenged, a multidisciplinary analysis of the historical development of economics might contribute to shedding light on the issues at the root of current debate. Besides essays and critical surveys, the journal includes archive material and reviews of new books on history of economics. History of Economic Ideas is double-blind peer reviewed.