The Economics of Financing Firms : Two Different Approaches

Q2 Arts and Humanities
G. Bertocco
{"title":"The Economics of Financing Firms : Two Different Approaches","authors":"G. Bertocco","doi":"10.1400/113199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Up to a few years ago, macroeconomic theory did not pay any attention to the topic of firm financing, This situation has changed in recent years thanks to the development of a theoretical approach that has applied the conclusions of information economics to the analysis of the working of the financial markets. This approach does not constitute the only theoretical framework which gives prominence to the issue of firm finance; a meaningful theory could be elaborated on the basis of the works of Keynes and Schumpeter. The aim of this paper is to highlight the most significant differences between these two approaches; it will be shown that the distinctive element of the asymmetric information approach is the return to the principle of the neutrality of financial variables. In contrast, the Keynes-Schumpeter approach underlines that bank money, banks and credit market are elements that mark an economy that is completely different from the pure exchange economy to which the principle of the neutrality of the financial variables is applied. The paper shows the reasons why the Keynes-Schumpeter approach seems more suitable to analyse the evolution of modern economies.","PeriodicalId":38602,"journal":{"name":"History of Economic Ideas","volume":"141 1","pages":"85-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Economic Ideas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1400/113199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Up to a few years ago, macroeconomic theory did not pay any attention to the topic of firm financing, This situation has changed in recent years thanks to the development of a theoretical approach that has applied the conclusions of information economics to the analysis of the working of the financial markets. This approach does not constitute the only theoretical framework which gives prominence to the issue of firm finance; a meaningful theory could be elaborated on the basis of the works of Keynes and Schumpeter. The aim of this paper is to highlight the most significant differences between these two approaches; it will be shown that the distinctive element of the asymmetric information approach is the return to the principle of the neutrality of financial variables. In contrast, the Keynes-Schumpeter approach underlines that bank money, banks and credit market are elements that mark an economy that is completely different from the pure exchange economy to which the principle of the neutrality of the financial variables is applied. The paper shows the reasons why the Keynes-Schumpeter approach seems more suitable to analyse the evolution of modern economies.
融资公司的经济学:两种不同的方法
直到几年前,宏观经济理论并没有关注企业融资的话题,近年来,由于一种理论方法的发展,这种情况已经改变了,这种理论方法将信息经济学的结论应用于分析金融市场的运作。这种方法并不构成突出企业财务问题的唯一理论框架;一个有意义的理论可以在凯恩斯和熊彼特的著作的基础上阐述。本文的目的是突出这两种方法之间最显著的差异;它将表明,不对称信息方法的独特元素是回归金融变量中立原则。相比之下,凯恩斯-熊彼特方法强调,银行货币、银行和信贷市场是标志着一种经济的要素,这种经济与应用金融变量中立性原则的纯粹交换经济完全不同。本文展示了凯恩斯-熊彼特方法似乎更适合分析现代经济演变的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
History of Economic Ideas
History of Economic Ideas Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: History of Economic Ideas is a new international series of Quaderni di storia dell''economia politica, a journal founded in 1983 to promote collaboration between scholars who share an historical approach to the major issues, the various "revolutions" which have left their mark on economics and the spread of economic ideas beyond the narrow circle of specialists. History of Economic Ideas rejects the dichotomy between "analysis" and "culture": both aspects are of equal importance for a wider understanding of the subject. In a period such as our own, where paradigms which once seemed unshakeable are now being challenged, a multidisciplinary analysis of the historical development of economics might contribute to shedding light on the issues at the root of current debate. Besides essays and critical surveys, the journal includes archive material and reviews of new books on history of economics. History of Economic Ideas is double-blind peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信