Basing and the Pivot: Rebalancing U.S. Forces: Basing and Forward Presence in the Asia-Pacific

IF 0.3 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
R. Harkavy, C. Lord, Andrew S. Erickson
{"title":"Basing and the Pivot: Rebalancing U.S. Forces: Basing and Forward Presence in the Asia-Pacific","authors":"R. Harkavy, C. Lord, Andrew S. Erickson","doi":"10.1355/CS37-1J","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the U.S. military presence in the Middle East winds down, Asia and the Pacific are receiving increased attention from the American national security community. The Obama administration has announced a \"rebalancing\" of the U.S. military posture in the region, in reaction primarily to the startling improvement in Chinese air and naval capabilities over the last decade or so. This timely study sets out to assess the implications of this shift for the long-established U.S. military presence in Asia and the Pacific. This presence is anchored in a complex basing infrastructure that scholars--and Americans generally--too often take for granted. In remedying this state of affairs, this volume offers a detailed survey and analysis of this infrastructure, its history, the political complications it has frequently given rise to, and its recent and likely future evolution. American seapower requires a robust constellation of bases to support global power projection. Given the rise of China and the emergence of the Asia-Pacific as the center of global economic growth and strategic contention, nowhere is American basing access more important than in this region. Yet manifold political and military challenges, stemming not least of which from rapidly-improving Chinese long-range precision strike capabilities, complicate the future of American access and security here. This book addresses what will be needed to maintain the fundaments of U.S. seapower and force projection in the Asia-Pacific, and where the key trend lines are headed in that regard. This book demonstrates that U.S. Asia-Pacific basing and access is increasingly vital, yet increasingly vulnerable. It demands far more attention than the limited coverage it has received to date, and cannot be taken for granted. More must be done to preserve capabilities and access upon which American and allied security and prosperity depend.","PeriodicalId":51874,"journal":{"name":"Naval War College Review","volume":"67 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naval War College Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1355/CS37-1J","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

As the U.S. military presence in the Middle East winds down, Asia and the Pacific are receiving increased attention from the American national security community. The Obama administration has announced a "rebalancing" of the U.S. military posture in the region, in reaction primarily to the startling improvement in Chinese air and naval capabilities over the last decade or so. This timely study sets out to assess the implications of this shift for the long-established U.S. military presence in Asia and the Pacific. This presence is anchored in a complex basing infrastructure that scholars--and Americans generally--too often take for granted. In remedying this state of affairs, this volume offers a detailed survey and analysis of this infrastructure, its history, the political complications it has frequently given rise to, and its recent and likely future evolution. American seapower requires a robust constellation of bases to support global power projection. Given the rise of China and the emergence of the Asia-Pacific as the center of global economic growth and strategic contention, nowhere is American basing access more important than in this region. Yet manifold political and military challenges, stemming not least of which from rapidly-improving Chinese long-range precision strike capabilities, complicate the future of American access and security here. This book addresses what will be needed to maintain the fundaments of U.S. seapower and force projection in the Asia-Pacific, and where the key trend lines are headed in that regard. This book demonstrates that U.S. Asia-Pacific basing and access is increasingly vital, yet increasingly vulnerable. It demands far more attention than the limited coverage it has received to date, and cannot be taken for granted. More must be done to preserve capabilities and access upon which American and allied security and prosperity depend.
基地与再平衡:美国军力再平衡:在亚太地区的基地与前沿存在
随着美国在中东的军事存在逐渐减少,亚太地区正受到美国国家安全部门越来越多的关注。奥巴马政府已经宣布对美国在该地区的军事姿态进行“再平衡”,这主要是对中国在过去十年左右的空军和海军能力惊人提高的反应。这项及时的研究旨在评估这种转变对美国在亚太地区长期存在的军事存在的影响。这种存在植根于一个复杂的基地基础设施中,学者们——以及一般美国人——往往认为这是理所当然的。为了纠正这种状况,本书对这种基础设施、它的历史、它经常引起的政治复杂性以及它最近和可能的未来演变进行了详细的调查和分析。美国的海上力量需要一个强大的基地群来支持全球力量投射。鉴于中国的崛起以及亚太地区作为全球经济增长和战略竞争中心的出现,美国在该地区的军事基地部署比其他任何地方都更为重要。然而,各种各样的政治和军事挑战,尤其是来自中国迅速提高的远程精确打击能力,使美国在这里的进入和安全的未来复杂化。这本书阐述了维持美国在亚太地区海上力量和力量投射的基础所需要的东西,以及在这方面的关键趋势线。这本书表明,美国在亚太地区的基地和通道越来越重要,但也越来越脆弱。它需要比迄今为止得到的有限报道更多的关注,不能认为是理所当然的。必须做更多的工作来保持美国及其盟国的安全和繁荣所依赖的能力和通道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Naval War College Review
Naval War College Review INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信