Increasing and Decreasing Inequalities of Power: A Processual View. A Response to Cas Wouters, and a Proposal for Clarification

IF 0.9 3区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
N. Wilterdink
{"title":"Increasing and Decreasing Inequalities of Power: A Processual View. A Response to Cas Wouters, and a Proposal for Clarification","authors":"N. Wilterdink","doi":"10.12759/HSR.45.2020.4.347-374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"»Zunehmende und abnehmende Machtungleichheiten: eine prozesssoziologische Perspektive. Eine Antwort auf Cas Wouters und ein Vorschlag zur Verdeutlichung«. Responding to an essay by Cas Wouters in this journal, this article aims to clarify historical trends of increasing and decreasing power inequalities. It criticizes Wouters’s rejection of the notion of “functional dedemocratisation,” his claim that “functional democratisation” was a dominant trend in the whole of human history, and his idea that this process results from long-term trends of differentiation and integration. This paper specifies when and under which conditions processes of functional democratisation did occur, and when and under which conditions developments in the direction of growing power inequality were dominant. Explanations for trends in these different directions are advanced. The paper’s final section argues that for the past 40 years processes of both functional democratisation and functional dedemocratisation can be discerned, which take place on different integration levels and along different axes.","PeriodicalId":47073,"journal":{"name":"Historical Social Research-Historische Sozialforschung","volume":"45 1","pages":"347-374"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical Social Research-Historische Sozialforschung","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12759/HSR.45.2020.4.347-374","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

»Zunehmende und abnehmende Machtungleichheiten: eine prozesssoziologische Perspektive. Eine Antwort auf Cas Wouters und ein Vorschlag zur Verdeutlichung«. Responding to an essay by Cas Wouters in this journal, this article aims to clarify historical trends of increasing and decreasing power inequalities. It criticizes Wouters’s rejection of the notion of “functional dedemocratisation,” his claim that “functional democratisation” was a dominant trend in the whole of human history, and his idea that this process results from long-term trends of differentiation and integration. This paper specifies when and under which conditions processes of functional democratisation did occur, and when and under which conditions developments in the direction of growing power inequality were dominant. Explanations for trends in these different directions are advanced. The paper’s final section argues that for the past 40 years processes of both functional democratisation and functional dedemocratisation can be discerned, which take place on different integration levels and along different axes.
权力不平等的增加和减少:一个过程的观点。对卡斯•沃特斯的回应及澄清建议
人类与人类的关系:人类与社会的关系。《德国的未来》和《德国的未来》。这篇文章是对Cas Wouters在该杂志上发表的一篇文章的回应,旨在澄清权力不平等加剧和减少的历史趋势。它批评了乌特斯对“功能性民主化”概念的拒绝,他声称“功能性民主化”是整个人类历史的主导趋势,以及他认为这一过程是分化和整合的长期趋势的结果。本文详细说明了功能性民主化进程何时以及在何种条件下发生,以及何时以及在何种条件下,权力不平等的发展方向占主导地位。对这些不同方向的趋势的解释是先进的。本文的最后一节认为,在过去的40年里,功能性民主化和功能性去民主化的进程都可以被识别出来,它们发生在不同的一体化水平上,沿着不同的轴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信