The (Not Entirely) Financialized Enterprise - A Conceptual Proposal

IF 0.9 3区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Mitchell R. Faust, Jürgen Kädtler
{"title":"The (Not Entirely) Financialized Enterprise - A Conceptual Proposal","authors":"Mitchell R. Faust, Jürgen Kädtler","doi":"10.12759/HSR.44.2019.1.285-307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"»Das (nicht ganz) finanzialisierte Unternehmen. Ein konzeptioneller Vorschlag«. Against the background of financialization being applied as a sort of catch-all category for corporate reorganization and especially the deterioration of labor and working conditions the paper presents the concept of the “multi-referential enterprise.“ Capital market expectations put established labor relations under a new pressure, but competing ideas remain relevant as a reference in both institutional reform processes and everyday decision making at firm level, including labor relations. Respective power positions also depend on rights anchored in labor law, collective bargaining, and labor market regulations as well as on what happens to sources of primary power of the respective workforce due to labor market conditions, technological change, and pressures from value chain reorganization and globalization. Hence, what unions and works councils eventually have to concede in negotiations is not just a matter of the degree of financialization but of a variety of other structurations of the field and respective companies.","PeriodicalId":47073,"journal":{"name":"Historical Social Research-Historische Sozialforschung","volume":"44 1","pages":"285-307"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical Social Research-Historische Sozialforschung","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12759/HSR.44.2019.1.285-307","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

»Das (nicht ganz) finanzialisierte Unternehmen. Ein konzeptioneller Vorschlag«. Against the background of financialization being applied as a sort of catch-all category for corporate reorganization and especially the deterioration of labor and working conditions the paper presents the concept of the “multi-referential enterprise.“ Capital market expectations put established labor relations under a new pressure, but competing ideas remain relevant as a reference in both institutional reform processes and everyday decision making at firm level, including labor relations. Respective power positions also depend on rights anchored in labor law, collective bargaining, and labor market regulations as well as on what happens to sources of primary power of the respective workforce due to labor market conditions, technological change, and pressures from value chain reorganization and globalization. Hence, what unions and works councils eventually have to concede in negotiations is not just a matter of the degree of financialization but of a variety of other structurations of the field and respective companies.
(不完全)金融化企业——一个概念性建议
【Das (night ganz) finanzialisierte undernehmen。】Ein konzeptioneller Vorschlag [j]。在金融化被作为企业重组的一种包治百病的范畴,特别是在劳动和劳动条件恶化的背景下,本文提出了“多参照企业”的概念。“资本市场的预期给已建立的劳资关系带来了新的压力,但相互竞争的观点在制度改革过程和包括劳资关系在内的企业层面的日常决策中仍然具有参考意义。各自的权力地位还取决于劳动法、集体谈判和劳动力市场法规所规定的权利,以及劳动力市场条件、技术变革、价值链重组和全球化压力对各自劳动力主要权力来源的影响。因此,工会和劳资委员会在谈判中最终不得不让步的不仅是金融化程度的问题,还有该领域和各自公司的各种其他结构的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信