Effects of Questionnaire Order on Self-Reported Sexual Behavior, Risk Perceptions, and Ratings of HIV and STD Protection Strategies

Donald J. Scandell, Brian Wlazelek, Carl E. Bentelspacher, Keely S. Rees, Susan Thomas
{"title":"Effects of Questionnaire Order on Self-Reported Sexual Behavior, Risk Perceptions, and Ratings of HIV and STD Protection Strategies","authors":"Donald J. Scandell, Brian Wlazelek, Carl E. Bentelspacher, Keely S. Rees, Susan Thomas","doi":"10.1300/J056v15n01_05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study examined the effect of questionnaire order on the assessment of sexual behaviors, risk perceptions, and ratings of pro-tection strategies. College student participants (n = 138) were randomly assigned to complete the study measures in one of two orders: (1) sexual behaviors and risk perceptions questions followed by ratings of protec-tion strategies; or (2) protection strategy questions followed by sexual behaviors and risk perceptions. A significant effect for questionnaire order was found such that ratings of effectiveness of Illusory HIV and Illusory STD protection strategies were significantly higher, and risk perceptions were significantly lower, when sexual behavior questions were asked first in comparison to when protection strategy questions were asked first. However, questionnaire order had no effect on the self-report of sexual behaviors (number of sexual partners, unprotected vaginal and oral sex), or ratings of effectiveness of real HIV and STD protection strategies. The re-sults suggest that researchers need to carefully consider questionnaire order when assessing human sexuality.","PeriodicalId":85015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychology & human sexuality","volume":"15 1","pages":"53 - 67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J056v15n01_05","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychology & human sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v15n01_05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract This study examined the effect of questionnaire order on the assessment of sexual behaviors, risk perceptions, and ratings of pro-tection strategies. College student participants (n = 138) were randomly assigned to complete the study measures in one of two orders: (1) sexual behaviors and risk perceptions questions followed by ratings of protec-tion strategies; or (2) protection strategy questions followed by sexual behaviors and risk perceptions. A significant effect for questionnaire order was found such that ratings of effectiveness of Illusory HIV and Illusory STD protection strategies were significantly higher, and risk perceptions were significantly lower, when sexual behavior questions were asked first in comparison to when protection strategy questions were asked first. However, questionnaire order had no effect on the self-report of sexual behaviors (number of sexual partners, unprotected vaginal and oral sex), or ratings of effectiveness of real HIV and STD protection strategies. The re-sults suggest that researchers need to carefully consider questionnaire order when assessing human sexuality.
问卷顺序对自述性行为、风险认知、HIV和STD保护策略评分的影响
摘要本研究考察了问卷顺序对性行为评估、风险认知和保护策略评级的影响。大学生参与者(n = 138)被随机分配以两种顺序之一完成研究措施:(1)性行为和风险认知问题,随后是保护策略评级;(2)保护策略问题,其次是性行为和风险认知。问卷顺序的显著影响是,与先问保护策略问题相比,先问性行为问题时,先问虚幻艾滋病毒和虚幻性病保护策略的有效性评分显著较高,风险认知显著较低。然而,问卷顺序对性行为的自我报告(性伴侣的数量,无保护的阴道和口交),或真正的艾滋病毒和性病保护策略的有效性评级没有影响。研究结果表明,研究人员在评估人类性行为时需要仔细考虑问卷的顺序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信