{"title":"Une « décolonisation » par défaut?: Le cas de Lacroix, centre de colonisation de la commune mixte de La Calle (1920–1950)","authors":"Christine Mussard","doi":"10.1353/FCH.2012.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the case of a village named Lacroix, located in a commune mixte of French East Algeria—La Calle—where many European settlers abandoned their land a few years after obtaining it. In the early1920s, most of the first settlers put their land up for rent or sale to native people, because they were attracted by Tunisia, the border of which was just next to the village. In the 1950s, only five French families were still living in Lacroix. This movement can be considered as a sort of decolonization, even if this concept must be handled with care. Those migrations were very usual throughout the country at that time, but the case of Lacroix is a good example of a colonization area being recovered by the natives. The analysis of this long and complex process shows how the French authorities tried to retain land, creating inventive strategies for over 20 years. The process was very difficult, however, and finally failed, especially because of the conflicts between the local administration and central authorities. Moreover, the General Government showed no interest in this rural part of the colony, located at the Tunisian border. This case also raises the issue of the influence of local politicians, who managed to be heard over the administrator of the village or the settlers themselves. Finally, this paper discusses the objections that colonization had to face to be efficient while French Algeria was nearing its centennial.","PeriodicalId":29880,"journal":{"name":"French Colonial History","volume":"13 1","pages":"55 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/FCH.2012.0006","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"French Colonial History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/FCH.2012.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This paper explores the case of a village named Lacroix, located in a commune mixte of French East Algeria—La Calle—where many European settlers abandoned their land a few years after obtaining it. In the early1920s, most of the first settlers put their land up for rent or sale to native people, because they were attracted by Tunisia, the border of which was just next to the village. In the 1950s, only five French families were still living in Lacroix. This movement can be considered as a sort of decolonization, even if this concept must be handled with care. Those migrations were very usual throughout the country at that time, but the case of Lacroix is a good example of a colonization area being recovered by the natives. The analysis of this long and complex process shows how the French authorities tried to retain land, creating inventive strategies for over 20 years. The process was very difficult, however, and finally failed, especially because of the conflicts between the local administration and central authorities. Moreover, the General Government showed no interest in this rural part of the colony, located at the Tunisian border. This case also raises the issue of the influence of local politicians, who managed to be heard over the administrator of the village or the settlers themselves. Finally, this paper discusses the objections that colonization had to face to be efficient while French Algeria was nearing its centennial.
本文探讨了一个名为拉克鲁瓦的村庄的案例,这个村庄位于法属东阿尔及利亚- la calle的混合公社,许多欧洲定居者在获得土地几年后放弃了他们的土地。在20世纪20年代早期,第一批移民中的大多数人将他们的土地出租或出售给当地人,因为他们被突尼斯所吸引,突尼斯的边界就在村庄旁边。在20世纪50年代,只有五个法国家庭还住在拉克鲁瓦。这一运动可以被视为一种非殖民化,尽管必须小心处理这一概念。在那个时候,这种移民在全国范围内是非常普遍的,但拉克鲁瓦的情况是一个很好的例子,一个殖民地区被当地人恢复了。对这一漫长而复杂的过程的分析表明,法国当局在20多年的时间里是如何努力保留土地的,创造了创造性的战略。然而,这个过程非常困难,最后失败了,特别是因为地方政府和中央当局之间的冲突。此外,总政府对位于突尼斯边境的殖民地农村地区没有表现出任何兴趣。这一案件还提出了当地政客的影响问题,他们设法在村长或定居者本身的意见上发表意见。最后,本文讨论了反对意见,殖民必须面对是有效的,而法属阿尔及利亚是接近其百年纪念。