Comparison of Shoulder Range of Motion Evaluation by Traditional and Semi-Automatic Methods

IF 0.9 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Sonia C Mantilla, C. Peña, G. G. Moreno
{"title":"Comparison of Shoulder Range of Motion Evaluation by Traditional and Semi-Automatic Methods","authors":"Sonia C Mantilla, C. Peña, G. G. Moreno","doi":"10.12720/jait.14.4.749-757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"—This article compares the results obtained from applying two methods of measuring the range of motion in the upper extremity. From a descriptive, cross-sectional study, measurements were made using the most widely used and traditional method in the health area known as goniometry as well as a semi-automatic method developed using new technological tools. The results demonstrated that the technique has a high sensitivity and can analyze static body positions and movement evolutions, expanding its applicability range","PeriodicalId":36452,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Information Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12720/jait.14.4.749-757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

—This article compares the results obtained from applying two methods of measuring the range of motion in the upper extremity. From a descriptive, cross-sectional study, measurements were made using the most widely used and traditional method in the health area known as goniometry as well as a semi-automatic method developed using new technological tools. The results demonstrated that the technique has a high sensitivity and can analyze static body positions and movement evolutions, expanding its applicability range
传统方法与半自动方法肩关节活动度评估的比较
本文比较了两种测量上肢活动范围的方法所得到的结果。根据一项描述性横断面研究,测量使用了卫生领域最广泛使用的传统方法,即所谓的角度测量法,以及使用新技术工具开发的半自动方法。结果表明,该技术具有较高的灵敏度,可以分析静态身体位置和运动演变,扩大了其适用范围
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Advances in Information Technology
Journal of Advances in Information Technology Computer Science-Information Systems
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信