Utilizing Word Index Approach with LSTM Architecture for Extracting Adverse Drug Reaction from Medical Reviews

Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.12720/jait.14.3.543-549
Asmaa J. M. Alshaikhdeeb, Y. Cheah
{"title":"Utilizing Word Index Approach with LSTM Architecture for Extracting Adverse Drug Reaction from Medical Reviews","authors":"Asmaa J. M. Alshaikhdeeb, Y. Cheah","doi":"10.12720/jait.14.3.543-549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"— Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) detection from social reviews refers to the task of exploring medical online stores and social reviews for extracting any mention of abnormal reactions that occur after consuming a particular medical product by the consumers themselves. A variety of approaches have been used for extracting ADR from social/medical reviews. These approaches include machine learning, dictionary-based and statistical approaches. Yet, these approaches showed either a high dependency on using an external knowledge source for ADR detection or relying on domain-dependent mechanisms that might lose contextual information. This study aims to propose word sequencing with Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) architecture. A benchmark dataset of MedSyn has been used in the experiments. Then, a word indexing, mapping, and padding method have been used to represent the words within the reviews as fixed sequences. Such sequences have been fed into the LSTM consequentially. Experimental results showed that the proposed LSTM could achieve an F1 score of up to 92%. Comparing such a finding to the baseline studies reveals the superiority of LSTM. The demonstration of the efficacy of the proposed method has taken different forms including the examination of word indexing with different classifiers, the examination of different features with LSTM, and through the comparison against the baseline studies.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12720/jait.14.3.543-549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

— Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) detection from social reviews refers to the task of exploring medical online stores and social reviews for extracting any mention of abnormal reactions that occur after consuming a particular medical product by the consumers themselves. A variety of approaches have been used for extracting ADR from social/medical reviews. These approaches include machine learning, dictionary-based and statistical approaches. Yet, these approaches showed either a high dependency on using an external knowledge source for ADR detection or relying on domain-dependent mechanisms that might lose contextual information. This study aims to propose word sequencing with Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) architecture. A benchmark dataset of MedSyn has been used in the experiments. Then, a word indexing, mapping, and padding method have been used to represent the words within the reviews as fixed sequences. Such sequences have been fed into the LSTM consequentially. Experimental results showed that the proposed LSTM could achieve an F1 score of up to 92%. Comparing such a finding to the baseline studies reveals the superiority of LSTM. The demonstration of the efficacy of the proposed method has taken different forms including the examination of word indexing with different classifiers, the examination of different features with LSTM, and through the comparison against the baseline studies.
分享
查看原文
基于LSTM结构的词索引方法在医学评论中药物不良反应提取中的应用
-从社会评论中检测药品不良反应(ADR)是指通过搜索医疗在线商店和社会评论,提取消费者在使用特定医疗产品后出现的任何异常反应。从社会/医学评论中提取不良反应的方法多种多样。这些方法包括机器学习、基于字典和统计方法。然而,这些方法要么高度依赖于使用外部知识来源进行ADR检测,要么依赖于可能丢失上下文信息的领域相关机制。本研究旨在提出具有长短期记忆(LSTM)架构的词排序。实验中使用了MedSyn的基准数据集。然后,使用单词索引、映射和填充方法将评论中的单词表示为固定序列。这样的序列被送入LSTM。实验结果表明,所提出的LSTM可以达到高达92%的F1分数。将这一发现与基线研究进行比较,揭示了LSTM的优越性。所提出方法的有效性论证采取了不同的形式,包括使用不同的分类器检查词的标引,使用LSTM检查不同的特征,以及通过与基线研究的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信