{"title":"Outward Bound","authors":"Walter Licht","doi":"10.1353/rah.0.0151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bankruptcy court records contain gold mines of information on the workings of businesses. Companies seeking protections under federal bankruptcy laws had to submit internal documents confirming their assets, revenues, expenses, and debts and credits due. With archived lists of creditors and debtors, scholars digging into the records can reconstruct chains of suppliers and purchasers of goods and services; if workers or governments registered claims with the courts, aspects of labor and community relations can be revealed as well.1 The deposed papers sitting in boxes in regional warehouses of the National Archives and Records Administration are voluminous and daunting, a reason perhaps why greater numbers of historians have not tapped them. If scholars need convincing of the richness of the records (and their potential for innovative use), a reading of Robert Lewis’s Chicago Made: Factory Networks in the Industrial Metropolis is highly recommended. The book also bares certain drawbacks to relying on them almost exclusively. Lewis’s book addresses two literatures in industrial history studies. The first involves the geographical location of manufacturing companies and, specifically, their clustering in city centers. The second concerns the interfirm nexuses within which manufacturers operated and, specifically, the salience of networks. Chicago serves for Lewis’s investigations. Chicago now is likely firstrather than second-city, in terms of scholarly attention. For more than a hundred years, social surveyors and historians have fixed on the city to examine social stratification, residential patterning, racial and ethnic divides and hostilities, labor organizing and conflict, living and working conditions, reform movements, the built (and rebuilt) environment, urban planning, ward politics in its classic dimensions, and regionalism. Weariness and wariness are understandable responses to the prospects of yet another book on Chicago, but Lewis’s Chicago Made, rest assured, contributes uniquely to the brimming historiography. For example, proprietorships, diversified manufacture, and specialization are now considered the hallmarks of such industrial cities as","PeriodicalId":76606,"journal":{"name":"The Australian nurses' journal. Royal Australian Nursing Federation","volume":"37 1","pages":"578 - 583"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/rah.0.0151","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Australian nurses' journal. Royal Australian Nursing Federation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rah.0.0151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Bankruptcy court records contain gold mines of information on the workings of businesses. Companies seeking protections under federal bankruptcy laws had to submit internal documents confirming their assets, revenues, expenses, and debts and credits due. With archived lists of creditors and debtors, scholars digging into the records can reconstruct chains of suppliers and purchasers of goods and services; if workers or governments registered claims with the courts, aspects of labor and community relations can be revealed as well.1 The deposed papers sitting in boxes in regional warehouses of the National Archives and Records Administration are voluminous and daunting, a reason perhaps why greater numbers of historians have not tapped them. If scholars need convincing of the richness of the records (and their potential for innovative use), a reading of Robert Lewis’s Chicago Made: Factory Networks in the Industrial Metropolis is highly recommended. The book also bares certain drawbacks to relying on them almost exclusively. Lewis’s book addresses two literatures in industrial history studies. The first involves the geographical location of manufacturing companies and, specifically, their clustering in city centers. The second concerns the interfirm nexuses within which manufacturers operated and, specifically, the salience of networks. Chicago serves for Lewis’s investigations. Chicago now is likely firstrather than second-city, in terms of scholarly attention. For more than a hundred years, social surveyors and historians have fixed on the city to examine social stratification, residential patterning, racial and ethnic divides and hostilities, labor organizing and conflict, living and working conditions, reform movements, the built (and rebuilt) environment, urban planning, ward politics in its classic dimensions, and regionalism. Weariness and wariness are understandable responses to the prospects of yet another book on Chicago, but Lewis’s Chicago Made, rest assured, contributes uniquely to the brimming historiography. For example, proprietorships, diversified manufacture, and specialization are now considered the hallmarks of such industrial cities as
破产法庭记录中包含了企业运作信息的金矿。寻求联邦破产法保护的公司必须提交内部文件,确认其资产、收入、支出以及到期债务和信贷。有了存档的债权人和债务人名单,学者们深入研究这些记录,可以重建商品和服务的供应商和购买者的链条;如果工人或政府向法院提出索赔,劳动和社区关系的各个方面也可以被披露在美国国家档案和记录管理局(National Archives and Records Administration)地区仓库的箱子里,存放着大量令人生畏的废弃文件,这可能是更多历史学家没有利用它们的原因。如果学者们需要相信这些记录的丰富性(以及它们创新利用的潜力),那么强烈推荐阅读罗伯特·刘易斯的《芝加哥制造:工业大都市的工厂网络》。这本书也暴露了几乎完全依赖它们的某些缺点。刘易斯的书涉及工业历史研究中的两种文献。第一个问题涉及制造业公司的地理位置,特别是它们在城市中心的聚集。第二个问题涉及制造商在其中运作的公司间联系,特别是网络的突出性。刘易斯的调查地点在芝加哥。就学术关注度而言,芝加哥现在可能是第一而不是第二城市。一百多年来,社会测量学家和历史学家一直在研究城市的社会分层、居住模式、种族和民族的分裂和敌对、劳工组织和冲突、生活和工作条件、改革运动、建成(和重建)的环境、城市规划、典型维度的选区政治和地域主义。对于另一本关于芝加哥的书的前景,读者的厌倦和警惕是可以理解的,但刘易斯的《芝加哥制造》(Chicago Made),请放心,为这本内容丰富的历史著作做出了独特的贡献。例如,独资经营、多样化生产和专业化现在被认为是工业城市的标志