{"title":"Repetition, Parallelism and Antonymous Verbal Phrases in Early and Classical Modern Irish","authors":"D. Mcmanus","doi":"10.1353/eri.0.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is divided into two sections. In the first, attention is drawn to three categories of rhetorical device described in the commentary to the Amrae Coluimb Chille, all of which involve some form of repetition. This is the starting point for a discussion of the artful use of repetition in Early and Classical Modern Irish literature. Examples of such repetition and parallel phrasing are provided for both periods. In the Classical period this inevitably involves some discussion of breacadh, a metrical and stylistic ornament involving repetition. In the second section, the focus moves to parallel phrases based on antithesis (such as English ‘the Lord giveth, the Lord taketh away’) or contrast. The antonymy may be conveyed lexically (as in the example just quoted, ‘give’ vs ‘take’) or antithesis may be created morphologically (through a contrast of tense and voice, for instance, gonas géntair ‘he who kills will be killed’). The make-up of these antonymous parallel phrases will be described, the types of antithesis encountered discussed and questions of their interpretation addressed. A collection of Early Irish and Classical Modern Irish examples concludes the paper.","PeriodicalId":38655,"journal":{"name":"Eriu","volume":"1 1","pages":"-"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eriu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/eri.0.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper is divided into two sections. In the first, attention is drawn to three categories of rhetorical device described in the commentary to the Amrae Coluimb Chille, all of which involve some form of repetition. This is the starting point for a discussion of the artful use of repetition in Early and Classical Modern Irish literature. Examples of such repetition and parallel phrasing are provided for both periods. In the Classical period this inevitably involves some discussion of breacadh, a metrical and stylistic ornament involving repetition. In the second section, the focus moves to parallel phrases based on antithesis (such as English ‘the Lord giveth, the Lord taketh away’) or contrast. The antonymy may be conveyed lexically (as in the example just quoted, ‘give’ vs ‘take’) or antithesis may be created morphologically (through a contrast of tense and voice, for instance, gonas géntair ‘he who kills will be killed’). The make-up of these antonymous parallel phrases will be described, the types of antithesis encountered discussed and questions of their interpretation addressed. A collection of Early Irish and Classical Modern Irish examples concludes the paper.
本文分为两部分。在第一部分中,我们将注意力集中在Amrae columimb Chille注释中描述的三类修辞手法上,它们都涉及某种形式的重复。这是讨论早期和古典现代爱尔兰文学中巧妙使用重复的起点。在这两个时期都提供了这种重复和平行措词的例子。在古典时期,这不可避免地涉及到一些关于长度的讨论,这是一种涉及重复的韵律和风格装饰。在第二部分,重点转移到基于对位的平行短语(如英语“the Lord giveth, the Lord took away”)或对比。反义词可以在词汇上表达(如刚才引用的例子,give和take),对偶可以在语态上产生(通过时态和语态的对比,例如,gonas gsamitair“杀人的人会被杀”)。这些匿名平行短语的组成将被描述,类型的对偶遇到的讨论和他们的解释的问题。本文以早期爱尔兰语和古典现代爱尔兰语为例进行总结。