Fluid-structural design analysis for composite aircraft wings with various fiber properties

IF 0.7 Q4 MECHANICS
Shugo Date, Yoshiaki Abe, Takeki Yamamoto, T. Okabe
{"title":"Fluid-structural design analysis for composite aircraft wings with various fiber properties","authors":"Shugo Date, Yoshiaki Abe, Takeki Yamamoto, T. Okabe","doi":"10.1299/jfst.2021jfst0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study performed an analysis for the fluid-structural design of aircraft wings composed of carbon fiber reinforced plastics (CFRPs). Specifically, the effects of carbon fibers on structural weight were evaluated. A multiscale computational framework was developed for designing CFRP wings so that even those CFRPs can be considered whose mechanical properties are not available as experimentally-measured data, thereby bridging two different scales by the following processes: 1) a microscale analysis for evaluating the mechanical properties (stiffness and strength) of unidirectional CFRP laminates and 2) a macroscale fluid-structural analysis that involves structural sizing of wingbox structures based on the mechanical properties given by the microscale analysis. To this end, five fibers were examined in this study, namely: T300, T700S, T800H, T800S, and T1100G. It was discovered that T1100G exhibited the lightest wingbox structures, followed by T800S, T800H, T700S, T300. This was mainly due to the difference in a thickness of the lower panels, where the thickness was minimized with T1100G among the five fibers, resulting from the tensile failure mode. Meanwhile, the upper panels under compressive load showed two different failure modes, namely: fiber microbuckling and skin buckling. In the region where the fiber microbuckling was dominant, the panel thickness was in order of the stiffness of the fiber, i.e., the panel made with T1100G having the highest stiffness was thicker than that made with T800S, T800H, T700S and T300, and vice versa in the region where the skin buckling was dominant. Based on the microscale analysis, the aforementioned failure mechanisms are consistent with the fact that a quasi-isotropic laminate with the fibers of higher stiffness is more resistant to tensile load and skin buckling but less resistant to compressive load.","PeriodicalId":44704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fluid Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fluid Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1299/jfst.2021jfst0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study performed an analysis for the fluid-structural design of aircraft wings composed of carbon fiber reinforced plastics (CFRPs). Specifically, the effects of carbon fibers on structural weight were evaluated. A multiscale computational framework was developed for designing CFRP wings so that even those CFRPs can be considered whose mechanical properties are not available as experimentally-measured data, thereby bridging two different scales by the following processes: 1) a microscale analysis for evaluating the mechanical properties (stiffness and strength) of unidirectional CFRP laminates and 2) a macroscale fluid-structural analysis that involves structural sizing of wingbox structures based on the mechanical properties given by the microscale analysis. To this end, five fibers were examined in this study, namely: T300, T700S, T800H, T800S, and T1100G. It was discovered that T1100G exhibited the lightest wingbox structures, followed by T800S, T800H, T700S, T300. This was mainly due to the difference in a thickness of the lower panels, where the thickness was minimized with T1100G among the five fibers, resulting from the tensile failure mode. Meanwhile, the upper panels under compressive load showed two different failure modes, namely: fiber microbuckling and skin buckling. In the region where the fiber microbuckling was dominant, the panel thickness was in order of the stiffness of the fiber, i.e., the panel made with T1100G having the highest stiffness was thicker than that made with T800S, T800H, T700S and T300, and vice versa in the region where the skin buckling was dominant. Based on the microscale analysis, the aforementioned failure mechanisms are consistent with the fact that a quasi-isotropic laminate with the fibers of higher stiffness is more resistant to tensile load and skin buckling but less resistant to compressive load.
不同纤维性能复合材料飞机机翼流固设计分析
本研究对碳纤维增强塑料(CFRPs)飞机机翼的流固结构设计进行了分析。具体来说,碳纤维对结构重量的影响进行了评估。为设计碳纤维布机翼开发了一个多尺度计算框架,以便即使那些碳纤维布的力学性能无法作为实验测量数据,也可以考虑,从而通过以下过程弥合两个不同的尺度:1)对单向碳纤维增强塑料(CFRP)复合材料的力学性能(刚度和强度)进行微尺度分析;2)对翼箱结构进行宏观流固分析,根据微尺度分析给出的力学性能对翼箱结构进行结构尺寸确定。为此,本研究考察了五种光纤,分别是T300、T700S、T800H、T800S和T1100G。结果发现,翼箱结构最轻的是T1100G,其次是T800S、T800H、T700S、T300。这主要是由于下面板的厚度差异,其中厚度最小化与T1100G之间的五种纤维,导致拉伸破坏模式。同时,在压缩荷载作用下,上部板呈现出纤维微屈曲和表皮屈曲两种不同的破坏模式。在纤维微屈曲为主的区域,面板厚度与纤维的刚度成正比,即用T1100G制作的面板刚度最高,比用T800S、T800H、T700S和T300制作的面板厚,在皮屈曲为主的区域反之。基于微观尺度的分析,上述破坏机制与具有较高刚度纤维的准各向同性层合板对拉伸载荷和表皮屈曲的抵抗能力较强,而对压缩载荷的抵抗能力较弱相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: Journal of Fluid Science and Technology (JFST) is an international journal published by the Fluids Engineering Division in the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers (JSME). JSME had been publishing Bulletin of the JSME (1958-1986) and JSME International Journal (1987-2006) by the continuous volume numbers. Considering the recent circumstances of the academic journals in the field of mechanical engineering, JSME reorganized the journal editorial system. Namely, JSME discontinued former International Journals and projected new publications from the divisions belonging to JSME. The Fluids Engineering Division acted quickly among all divisions and launched the premiere issue of JFST in January 2006. JFST aims at contributing to the development of fluid engineering by publishing superior papers of the scientific and technological studies in this field. The editorial committee will make all efforts for promoting strictly fair and speedy review for submitted articles. All JFST papers will be available for free at the website of J-STAGE (http://www.i-product.biz/jsme/eng/), which is hosted by Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST). Thus papers can be accessed worldwide by lead scientists and engineers. In addition, authors can express their results variedly by high-quality color drawings and pictures. JFST invites the submission of original papers on wide variety of fields related to fluid mechanics and fluid engineering. The topics to be treated should be corresponding to the following keywords of the Fluids Engineering Division of the JSME. Basic keywords include: turbulent flow; multiphase flow; non-Newtonian fluids; functional fluids; quantum and molecular dynamics; wave; acoustics; vibration; free surface flows; cavitation; fluid machinery; computational fluid dynamics (CFD); experimental fluid dynamics (EFD); Bio-fluid.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信