The Silence and the Silence Breakers of the Irish Civil War, 1922–2022

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
EIRE-IRELAND Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1353/eir.2022.0012
Síobhra Aiken
{"title":"The Silence and the Silence Breakers of the Irish Civil War, 1922–2022","authors":"Síobhra Aiken","doi":"10.1353/eir.2022.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The original timeline proposed for the Decade of Commemorations (2012–22) omitted the latter half of the Irish Civil War. The June 2022 centenary of the burning of the Public Record Office during the battle of the Four Courts was considered as a possible “capstone to the decade of centenaries.”1 Following public criticism, however, the chronology of the “decade” was extended until 2023 to cover the final months of the Civil War. But this initial reluctance is highly revealing in terms of official attitudes toward the period of civil conflict. It speaks to a long-established tendency to shy away from the realities of Irish-on-Irish violence and particularly the contentious events of June 1922 to May 1923. The idea that the destruction of centuries of historical documents could offer a symbolic ending to the commemorations also reflects the long-standing characterization of the Irish Civil War as an absence within the historical narrative: memoirs mysteriously end with the truce of July 1921; statements in the Bureau of Military History (BMH) stop suddenly before the Civil War; history textbooks were characterized for decades by “oblivion after 1922.”2 This type of socially validated silence is often a feature of the commemoration of war, mimicking perhaps the liturgical practices of mourning.3 But silence takes on even greater political significance in post–civil war society, as calls for amnesty in the name of the common good often translate into “amnesia” or “commanded forgetting”","PeriodicalId":43507,"journal":{"name":"EIRE-IRELAND","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EIRE-IRELAND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/eir.2022.0012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The original timeline proposed for the Decade of Commemorations (2012–22) omitted the latter half of the Irish Civil War. The June 2022 centenary of the burning of the Public Record Office during the battle of the Four Courts was considered as a possible “capstone to the decade of centenaries.”1 Following public criticism, however, the chronology of the “decade” was extended until 2023 to cover the final months of the Civil War. But this initial reluctance is highly revealing in terms of official attitudes toward the period of civil conflict. It speaks to a long-established tendency to shy away from the realities of Irish-on-Irish violence and particularly the contentious events of June 1922 to May 1923. The idea that the destruction of centuries of historical documents could offer a symbolic ending to the commemorations also reflects the long-standing characterization of the Irish Civil War as an absence within the historical narrative: memoirs mysteriously end with the truce of July 1921; statements in the Bureau of Military History (BMH) stop suddenly before the Civil War; history textbooks were characterized for decades by “oblivion after 1922.”2 This type of socially validated silence is often a feature of the commemoration of war, mimicking perhaps the liturgical practices of mourning.3 But silence takes on even greater political significance in post–civil war society, as calls for amnesty in the name of the common good often translate into “amnesia” or “commanded forgetting”
爱尔兰内战中的沉默与打破沉默者,1922-2022
最初为纪念十年(2012-22)提出的时间表省略了爱尔兰内战的后半段。2022年6月,在“四庭之战”期间,公共档案办公室被烧毁,100周年纪念活动被认为可能是“十年纪念活动的顶点”。然而,在公众的批评下,“十年”的时间被延长到2023年,以涵盖内战的最后几个月。但从官方对内战时期的态度来看,这种最初的不情愿很能说明问题。它反映了一种长期存在的倾向,即回避爱尔兰对爱尔兰暴力的现实,尤其是1922年6月至1923年5月的有争议的事件。毁掉几个世纪的历史文献可以为纪念活动提供一个象征性的结束,这种想法也反映了爱尔兰内战长期以来在历史叙事中缺席的特征:回忆录神秘地以1921年7月的休战结束;军事历史局(BMH)的声明在内战前突然停止;几十年来,历史教科书的特点是“1922年后的遗忘”。这种社会认可的沉默通常是纪念战争的一种特征,可能模仿了哀悼的礼仪实践但是,在内战后的社会中,沉默具有更大的政治意义,因为以共同利益的名义要求大赦的呼声常常被翻译成“失忆”或“命令遗忘”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EIRE-IRELAND
EIRE-IRELAND HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: An interdisciplinary scholarly journal of international repute, Éire Ireland is the leading forum in the flourishing field of Irish Studies. Since 1966, Éire-Ireland has published a wide range of imaginative work and scholarly articles from all areas of the arts, humanities, and social sciences relating to Ireland and Irish America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信