Decolonizing imperialist discourse in Jane Austen’s Persuasion

IF 0.3 Q3 AREA STUDIES
M. Abd-Rabbo, Ghadir Zalloum, Ziad Nemrawi
{"title":"Decolonizing imperialist discourse in Jane Austen’s Persuasion","authors":"M. Abd-Rabbo, Ghadir Zalloum, Ziad Nemrawi","doi":"10.13169/arabstudquar.45.3.0229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his highly influential work Culture and Imperialism, Edward Said unravels the imperialist undertones in Jane Austen’s Mansfield Park. Throughout the chapter entitled “Jane Austen and the Empire,” Said demonstrates how this seemingly domestic novel of manners, not normally associated with imperialism, is actually densely saturated with colonialist discourse. For Said, the marginalized representation of the colonized territory of Antigua as simply a “colonial garden” for the British imperial patriarch further accentuates the superior sense of colonialist entitlement. Thus, Said’s approach in decolonizing the imperialist discourse in Mansfield Park may be extended to other canonical works not generally considered imperialist in nature. In this article, the researchers utilize Said’s strategies involved in his reading of Mansfield Park to probe the imperialist nuances in Austen’s Persuasion, a novel usually categorized as a romance/novel of manners which depicts two lovers’ second chance at happiness despite all the social obstacles in their way. The researchers attempt to foreground the imperialist rhetoric in this novel, specifically Austen’s tendency to romanticize and glorify the rising British naval society as the champions of the Empire. Furthermore, this article investigates the absent, peripheral representation of colonial terrains as opposed to the privileged, central position of the British Empire in the narrative.","PeriodicalId":44343,"journal":{"name":"Arab Studies Quarterly","volume":"545 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arab Studies Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13169/arabstudquar.45.3.0229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In his highly influential work Culture and Imperialism, Edward Said unravels the imperialist undertones in Jane Austen’s Mansfield Park. Throughout the chapter entitled “Jane Austen and the Empire,” Said demonstrates how this seemingly domestic novel of manners, not normally associated with imperialism, is actually densely saturated with colonialist discourse. For Said, the marginalized representation of the colonized territory of Antigua as simply a “colonial garden” for the British imperial patriarch further accentuates the superior sense of colonialist entitlement. Thus, Said’s approach in decolonizing the imperialist discourse in Mansfield Park may be extended to other canonical works not generally considered imperialist in nature. In this article, the researchers utilize Said’s strategies involved in his reading of Mansfield Park to probe the imperialist nuances in Austen’s Persuasion, a novel usually categorized as a romance/novel of manners which depicts two lovers’ second chance at happiness despite all the social obstacles in their way. The researchers attempt to foreground the imperialist rhetoric in this novel, specifically Austen’s tendency to romanticize and glorify the rising British naval society as the champions of the Empire. Furthermore, this article investigates the absent, peripheral representation of colonial terrains as opposed to the privileged, central position of the British Empire in the narrative.
简·奥斯汀《劝导》中的非殖民化帝国主义话语
在他极具影响力的著作《文化与帝国主义》中,爱德华·赛义德揭示了简·奥斯汀的《曼斯菲尔德庄园》中隐含的帝国主义色彩。在《简·奥斯丁与帝国》这一章中,赛义德展示了这本看似家庭小说的礼仪,通常与帝国主义无关,实际上却充斥着殖民主义的话语。对赛义德来说,安提瓜被殖民领土被边缘化,仅仅是英国帝国族长的“殖民花园”,这进一步凸显了殖民主义者的优越感。因此,赛义德在《曼斯菲尔德庄园》中去殖民化帝国主义话语的方法可以扩展到其他通常不被认为是帝国主义性质的经典作品中。在这篇文章中,研究人员利用赛义德在阅读《曼斯菲尔德庄园》时所采用的策略来探究奥斯丁的《劝导》中帝国主义的细微差别。这部小说通常被归类为浪漫小说/礼貌小说,描述了两个恋人在遇到所有社会障碍的情况下获得幸福的第二次机会。研究人员试图在这部小说中突出帝国主义的修辞,特别是奥斯汀将崛起的英国海军社会浪漫化和美化为帝国的捍卫者的倾向。此外,本文还探讨了与大英帝国在叙事中享有特权的中心地位相反,殖民地地形的缺席和外围表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arab Studies Quarterly
Arab Studies Quarterly AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
33.30%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信