Does Diversity Drive Non-Financial Reporting: Evidence from the Baltic States

Ilze Zumente, Nataļja Lāce
{"title":"Does Diversity Drive Non-Financial Reporting: Evidence from the Baltic States","authors":"Ilze Zumente, Nataļja Lāce","doi":"10.13165/IE-20-14-2-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"More and more companies worldwide choose to perform environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosures to improve their financial and reputational performance. Several recent studies suggest that board diversity can have a material role in explaining the ESG disclosure differences. This article aims to evaluate the relationship between board diversity and the ESG disclosures for companies listed on the NASDAQ OMX Baltic Stock exchange. First, the board diversity metrics of the public companies in Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia are derived and compared to a sample of listed companies in other European countries to provide a relative comparison of the current degree of board diversity. Next, by performing content analysis of the non-financial reports and statistical analysis of the retrieved data, ESG disclosure scores are obtained. Finally, a correlation and independent t-test analysis is performed to evaluate the board diversity’s influence on the ESG disclosure scores. The results show that companies with larger boards and companies having female representatives on their supervisory boards have on average higher non-financial disclosures scores. No statistically significant results are found for gender diversity on the management boards. The results shed a light on the current stance of the board diversity of the listed Baltic companies as well as contribute to the growing academic literature trying to derive the sustainability drivers in the corporate set-up.","PeriodicalId":37115,"journal":{"name":"Intellectual Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intellectual Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13165/IE-20-14-2-04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

More and more companies worldwide choose to perform environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosures to improve their financial and reputational performance. Several recent studies suggest that board diversity can have a material role in explaining the ESG disclosure differences. This article aims to evaluate the relationship between board diversity and the ESG disclosures for companies listed on the NASDAQ OMX Baltic Stock exchange. First, the board diversity metrics of the public companies in Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia are derived and compared to a sample of listed companies in other European countries to provide a relative comparison of the current degree of board diversity. Next, by performing content analysis of the non-financial reports and statistical analysis of the retrieved data, ESG disclosure scores are obtained. Finally, a correlation and independent t-test analysis is performed to evaluate the board diversity’s influence on the ESG disclosure scores. The results show that companies with larger boards and companies having female representatives on their supervisory boards have on average higher non-financial disclosures scores. No statistically significant results are found for gender diversity on the management boards. The results shed a light on the current stance of the board diversity of the listed Baltic companies as well as contribute to the growing academic literature trying to derive the sustainability drivers in the corporate set-up.
多元化是否推动非财务报告:来自波罗的海国家的证据
全球越来越多的公司选择进行环境、社会和治理(ESG)披露,以改善其财务和声誉表现。最近的几项研究表明,董事会多样性可能在解释ESG披露差异方面发挥了重要作用。本文旨在评估纳斯达克OMX波罗的海证券交易所上市公司董事会多样性与ESG披露之间的关系。首先,本文推导了立陶宛、拉脱维亚和爱沙尼亚上市公司的董事会多样性指标,并与其他欧洲国家的上市公司样本进行了比较,以提供当前董事会多样性程度的相对比较。接下来,通过对非财务报告进行内容分析,并对检索到的数据进行统计分析,得出ESG披露得分。最后,通过相关检验和独立t检验分析,评估董事会多样性对ESG披露得分的影响。结果显示,董事会规模较大的公司和监事会中有女性代表的公司在非财务信息披露方面的平均得分较高。在管理委员会的性别多样性方面没有发现统计上显著的结果。研究结果揭示了波罗的海上市公司董事会多样性的现状,并为越来越多的学术文献做出了贡献,这些文献试图推导出公司结构中的可持续性驱动因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intellectual Economics
Intellectual Economics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信