Assessing the Climate Impacts of Cookstove Projects: Issues in Emissions Accounting

Pub Date : 2013-01-23 DOI:10.12924/CIS2013.01020053
Carrie M. Lee, C. Chandler, M. Lazarus, F. X. Johnson
{"title":"Assessing the Climate Impacts of Cookstove Projects: Issues in Emissions Accounting","authors":"Carrie M. Lee, C. Chandler, M. Lazarus, F. X. Johnson","doi":"10.12924/CIS2013.01020053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An estimated 2.6 billion people rely on traditional biomass for home cooking and heating, so improving the efficiency of household cookstoves could provide significant environmental, social and economic benefits. Some researchers have estimated that potential greenhouse gas emission reductions could exceed 1 billion tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO 2 e) per year. Carbon finance offers a policy mechanism for realizing some of this potential and could also bring improved monitoring to cookstove projects. However, there are formidable methodological challenges in estimating emission reductions. This paper evaluates the quantification approaches to three key variables in calculating emission impacts: biomass fuel consumption, fraction of non-renewable biomass, and emission factors for fuel consumption. It draws on a literature review as well as on interviews with technical experts and market actors, and identifies lessons learned and knowledge gaps. Key research needs identified include incorporating accounting for uncertainty; development of additional default factors for biomass consumption for baseline stoves; refinement of monitoring approaches for cookstove use; broadened scope of emission factors used for cookstoves; accounting for non-CO 2 gases and black carbon; and refinement of estimates and approaches to considering emissions from bioenergy use across methodologies.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"72","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12924/CIS2013.01020053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 72

Abstract

An estimated 2.6 billion people rely on traditional biomass for home cooking and heating, so improving the efficiency of household cookstoves could provide significant environmental, social and economic benefits. Some researchers have estimated that potential greenhouse gas emission reductions could exceed 1 billion tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO 2 e) per year. Carbon finance offers a policy mechanism for realizing some of this potential and could also bring improved monitoring to cookstove projects. However, there are formidable methodological challenges in estimating emission reductions. This paper evaluates the quantification approaches to three key variables in calculating emission impacts: biomass fuel consumption, fraction of non-renewable biomass, and emission factors for fuel consumption. It draws on a literature review as well as on interviews with technical experts and market actors, and identifies lessons learned and knowledge gaps. Key research needs identified include incorporating accounting for uncertainty; development of additional default factors for biomass consumption for baseline stoves; refinement of monitoring approaches for cookstove use; broadened scope of emission factors used for cookstoves; accounting for non-CO 2 gases and black carbon; and refinement of estimates and approaches to considering emissions from bioenergy use across methodologies.
分享
查看原文
评估炉灶项目对气候的影响:排放核算中的问题
估计有26亿人依靠传统的生物质家庭烹饪和取暖,因此提高家庭炉灶的效率可以带来重大的环境、社会和经济效益。一些研究人员估计,潜在的温室气体减排每年可能超过10亿吨二氧化碳当量(CO 2 e)。碳融资为实现这一潜力提供了一种政策机制,还可以改善对炉灶项目的监测。然而,在估计排放量方面存在着巨大的方法上的挑战。本文评估了计算排放影响的三个关键变量的量化方法:生物质燃料消耗、不可再生生物质比例和燃料消耗的排放因子。它借鉴了文献综述以及对技术专家和市场参与者的采访,并确定了经验教训和知识差距。确定的主要研究需求包括纳入不确定性核算;制定基线炉生物质消耗的额外默认因素;改进炉灶使用监测方法;扩大炉灶排放系数范围;非二氧化碳气体和黑碳;改进评估和方法,以考虑跨方法使用生物能源产生的排放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信