A look at the field response of MEMS sensors compared to analog geophones

Q2 Earth and Planetary Sciences

Leading Edge Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1190/tle42050321.1

J. Criss, A. Selvakumar

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Commercial sensors for seismic data collection have changed little in the previous 20 years. The sensors that are available today have exceptional dynamic range and sensitivity. This paper explores and compares the field response of analog geophones and all-digital microelectrical-mechanical-sensors-based accelerometers from the perspective of the dynamic range of the recorded data. Also discussed are other characteristics of each sensor type and the potential impact on seismic data quality.

查看原文本刊更多论文

比较MEMS传感器与模拟检波器的场响应

在过去的20年里，用于地震数据收集的商用传感器几乎没有变化。目前可用的传感器具有出色的动态范围和灵敏度。本文从记录数据动态范围的角度，对模拟检波器和全数字微机电-机械传感器加速度计的场响应进行了探讨和比较。还讨论了每种传感器的其他特性以及对地震数据质量的潜在影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Leading Edge Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geology

CiteScore

3.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

180

期刊介绍： THE LEADING EDGE complements GEOPHYSICS, SEG"s peer-reviewed publication long unrivalled as the world"s most respected vehicle for dissemination of developments in exploration and development geophysics. TLE is a gateway publication, introducing new geophysical theory, instrumentation, and established practices to scientists in a wide range of geoscience disciplines. Most material is presented in a semitechnical manner that minimizes mathematical theory and emphasizes practical applications. TLE also serves as SEG"s publication venue for official society business.